This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62012CN0200
Case C-200/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 27 April 2012 — Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel, the other party being Y
Case C-200/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 27 April 2012 — Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel, the other party being Y
Case C-200/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 27 April 2012 — Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel, the other party being Y
OJ C 217, 21.7.2012, p. 8–8
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
21.7.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 217/8 |
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 27 April 2012 — Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel, the other party being Y
(Case C-200/12)
2012/C 217/15
Language of the case: Dutch
Referring court
Raad van State
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Minister voor Immigratie en Asiel
Other party: Y
Questions referred
1. |
Do foreign nationals with a homosexual orientation form a particular social group as referred to in Article 10(1)(d) of Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted (OJ 2004 L 304; ‘the Directive’)? |
2. |
If the first question is to be answered in the affirmative: which homosexual activities fall within the scope of the Directive and, in the case of acts of persecution in respect of those activities and if the other requirements are met, can that lead to the granting of refugee status? That question encompasses the following subquestions:
|
3. |
Do the criminalisation of homosexual activities and the threat of imprisonment in relation thereto, as set out in the Penal Code Act of Uganda, constitute an act of persecution as referred to in Article 9(1)(a), read in conjunction with Article 9(2)(c) of the Directive? If not, under what circumstances would that be the case? |