Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011TB0330

    Case T-330/11: Order of the General Court of 25 January 2012 — MasterCard and Others v European Commission (Actions for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Documents relating to a study of the costs and benefits to merchants of accepting different payment methods — Documents drawn up by a third party — Implied refusal of access — Interest in bringing proceedings — Express decision adopted after the bringing of the action — No need to adjudicate)

    OJ C 89, 24.3.2012, p. 24–24 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    24.3.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 89/24


    Order of the General Court of 25 January 2012 — MasterCard and Others v European Commission

    (Case T-330/11) (1)

    (Actions for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents relating to a study of the costs and benefits to merchants of accepting different payment methods - Documents drawn up by a third party - Implied refusal of access - Interest in bringing proceedings - Express decision adopted after the bringing of the action - No need to adjudicate)

    2012/C 89/40

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicants: MasterCard Inc. (Wilmington, Delaware, United States), MasterCard International, Inc. (Wilmington), MasterCard Europe (Waterloo, Belgium) (represented by: B. Amory, V. Brophy and S. McInnes, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and V. Bottka, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Action for annulment of the implied decision of the Commission to refuse the applicants access to certain documents drawn up by a third party relating to a study of the ‘costs and benefits to merchants of accepting different payment methods’

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

    2.

    The European Commission is ordered to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.


    Top