This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011TB0098
Case T-98/11 P: Order of the General Court of 10 February 2012 — AG v Parliament (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Dismissal at the end of the probationary period — Time-limit for bringing action — Lateness — Appeal clearly unfounded)
Case T-98/11 P: Order of the General Court of 10 February 2012 — AG v Parliament (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Dismissal at the end of the probationary period — Time-limit for bringing action — Lateness — Appeal clearly unfounded)
Case T-98/11 P: Order of the General Court of 10 February 2012 — AG v Parliament (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Dismissal at the end of the probationary period — Time-limit for bringing action — Lateness — Appeal clearly unfounded)
OJ C 89, 24.3.2012, p. 24–24
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
24.3.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 89/24 |
Order of the General Court of 10 February 2012 — AG v Parliament
(Case T-98/11 P) (1)
(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Dismissal at the end of the probationary period - Time-limit for bringing action - Lateness - Appeal clearly unfounded)
2012/C 89/39
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: AG (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Blot and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)
Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: S. Seyr and V. Montebello-Demogeot, agents)
Re:
Appeal brought against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (First Chamber) of 16 December 2010 in Case F-25/10 AG v Parliament, not yet reported in the ECR, seeking to have that order set aside.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The appeal as dismissed as clearly unfounded. |
|
2. |
AG is ordered to pay, apart from its own costs, the costs incurred by the European Parliament. |