This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62011FA0135
Joined Cases F-135/11, F-51/12, F-110/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 June 2013 — BU v EMA (Civil Service — Temporary staff — Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract — Act adversely affecting an official — Request within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations — Request for the reclassification of a contract — Reasonable period — Complaint against the rejection of a compliant — Article 8 of the CEOS — Duty of care)
Joined Cases F-135/11, F-51/12, F-110/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 June 2013 — BU v EMA (Civil Service — Temporary staff — Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract — Act adversely affecting an official — Request within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations — Request for the reclassification of a contract — Reasonable period — Complaint against the rejection of a compliant — Article 8 of the CEOS — Duty of care)
Joined Cases F-135/11, F-51/12, F-110/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 June 2013 — BU v EMA (Civil Service — Temporary staff — Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract — Act adversely affecting an official — Request within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations — Request for the reclassification of a contract — Reasonable period — Complaint against the rejection of a compliant — Article 8 of the CEOS — Duty of care)
Information about publishing Official Journal not found, p. 44–44
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Information about publishing Official Journal not found, p. 29–29
(HR)
|
31.8.2013 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 252/44 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 June 2013 — BU v EMA
(Joined Cases F-135/11, F-51/12, F-110/12) (1)
(Civil Service - Temporary staff - Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract - Act adversely affecting an official - Request within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations - Request for the reclassification of a contract - Reasonable period - Complaint against the rejection of a compliant - Article 8 of the CEOS - Duty of care)
2013/C 252/75
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: BU (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)
Defendant: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (represented: in Case F-135/11, by S. Vincenzo initially, then by T. Jablonski and G. Gavrilidou, Agents, and D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers; in Case F-51/12, by T. Jablonski and G. Gavrilidou, Agents, and D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers, and in Case F-110/12, by T. Jablonski and N. Rampal Olmedo, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision of the European Medicines Agency not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the European Medicines Agency not to renew BU’s contract, notified by the letter of 30 May 2011; |
|
2. |
Dismisses the action in Case F-135/11 as to the remainder; |
|
3. |
Dismisses the actions in Cases F-51/12 and F-110/12; |
|
4. |
Orders the European Medicines Agency to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by BU in Cases F-135/11 and F-51/12; |
|
5. |
Orders BU to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Medicines Agency in Case F-110/12. |
(1) OJ C 65, 3.3.2012, p. 24; OJ C 209, 14.7.2012, p. 14; OJ C 379, 8.12.12, p. 34.