Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62011FA0041

    Case F-41/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 13 June 2012 — Mocová v Commission (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract — Discretion — Article 8 of the Conditions of Employment of other Servants of the European Communities — Article 4 of the decision of the Director General of OLAF, of 30 June 2005 , on the engagement and employment of OLAF’s temporary staff — Maximum duration of contracts of a temporary agent)

    OJ C 227, 28.7.2012, p. 36–36 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    28.7.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 227/36


    Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 13 June 2012 — Mocová v Commission

    (Case F-41/11) (1)

    (Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Non-renewal of a fixed-term contract - Discretion - Article 8 of the Conditions of Employment of other Servants of the European Communities - Article 4 of the decision of the Director General of OLAF, of 30 June 2005, on the engagement and employment of OLAF’s temporary staff - Maximum duration of contracts of a temporary agent)

    2012/C 227/59

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Dana Mocová (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by:D. Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A.. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J Currall and D Martin, acting as Agents)

    Re:

    Application for annulment of the decision of the Director General of OLAF to reject the applicant’s application to extend her contract as a member of the temporary staff for the purposes of Article 2(1) of the Conditions of Employment of other Servants of the European Communities.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Tribunal:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders each party to bear its own costs.


    (1)  OJ C 282 of 24/09/11, p. 51.


    Top