Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62011CO0477

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 May 2012.
Sepracor Pharmaceuticals (Ireland) Ltd v European Commission.
Appeals - Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 - Medicinal products for human use - Active substance ‘eszopiclone’ - Marketing authorisation - Procedure - Statement of position by the Commission - Status of ‘new active substance’ - Concept of ‘actionable measure’.
Case C-477/11 P.

European Court Reports 2012 -00000

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2012:292





Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 May 2012 —
Sepracor Pharmaceuticals v Commission

(Case C‑477/11 P)

Appeal — Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 — Medicinal products for human use — Active substance ‘eszopiclone’ — Marketing authorisation — Procedure — Statement of position by the Commission — Status of ‘new active substance’ — Concept of ‘actionable measure’

Actions for annulment — Actionable measures — Meaning — Measures producing binding legal effects — Letter from the Commission setting out its position as to the steps to be taken in response to the opinion of the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use of the European Medicines Agency — Not included (Art. 263 TFEU; European Parliament and Council Regulation No 726/2004, Art. 10(2)) (see paras 51-58, 60, 61)

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 4 July 2011 in Case T‑275/09 P Sepracor Pharmaceuticals v Commission , dismissing as inadmissible an application for the annulment of the Commission’s decision of 6 May 2009 finding, in the context of the procedure for granting marketing authorisation for the medicinal product ‘Lunivia’, produced by the appellant, that the active substance ‘eszopiclone’, which it contains, does not constitute a new active substance within the meaning of Article 3(2)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2004 L 136, p. 1) — Concept of actionable measure.

Operative part

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

2.

Sepracor Pharmaceuticals Ltd is ordered to pay the costs.

Top