Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010TO0212

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010.
Strålfors AB v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM).
Action for annulment - Application initiating proceedings - Formal requirements - Manifest inadmissibility.
Case T-212/10.

European Court Reports 2010 II-00144*

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2010:302





Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010 – Strålfors v OHIM (IDENTIFICATION SOLUTIONS)

(Case T-212/10)

Action for annulment – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Manifest inadmissibility

Procedure – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based – Pleas in law not set out in the application – Reference to the whole of the annexes – Inadmissibility (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 21, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 44(1)(c)) (see paras 5-7)

Re:

ACTION against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 January 2010 (Case R 1112/2009-2), concerning an application for registration of word sign IDENTIFICATION SOLUTIONS as a Community trade mark.

Information relating to the case

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Strålfors AB

Community trade mark sought:

Word mark IDENTIFICATION SOLUTIONS for goods in Class 16 – Community trade mark application No 8235186

Decision of the examiner:

Registration partially refused

Decision of the Board of Appeal:

Dismissal of the appeal and confirmation of the contested decision


Operative part

1.      The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

2.      Strålfors AB is ordered to bear its own costs.

Top