This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010TB0452
Case T-452/10: Order of the General Court of 6 September 2011 — ClientEarth v Council (Action for annulment — Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-452/10: Order of the General Court of 6 September 2011 — ClientEarth v Council (Action for annulment — Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party — Manifest inadmissibility)
Case T-452/10: Order of the General Court of 6 September 2011 — ClientEarth v Council (Action for annulment — Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party — Manifest inadmissibility)
OJ C 319, 29.10.2011, p. 22–22
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
29.10.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 319/22 |
Order of the General Court of 6 September 2011 — ClientEarth v Council
(Case T-452/10) (1)
(Action for annulment - Representation by a lawyer who is not a third party - Manifest inadmissibility)
2011/C 319/47
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: ClientEarth (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Hockman QC, and P. Kirch, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: C. Fekete and B. Driessen, Agents)
Intervening parties on behalf of the applicant: Kingdom of Denmark (represented by C. Vang and S. Juul Jørgensen Agents); Republic of Finland (represented by H. Leppo and M. Pere, Agents); and Kingdom of Sweden (represented by K. Petkovska, A. Falk, S. Johannesson and C. Meyer-Seitz, Agents)
Re:
APPLICATION for annulment of the Council decision of 26 July 2010 refusing to grant the applicant full access to an opinion of the Council’s Legal Service (Document No 6865/09) on the European Parliament’s draft amendments to the Commission’s proposal for a regulation amending Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).
Operative part of the order
1. |
The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible. |
2. |
ClientEarth shall bear its own costs and also pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
3. |
The Kingdom of Denmark, the Republic of Finland and the Kingdom of Sweden shall bear their own respective costs. |