EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62010TA0143

Case T-143/10: Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2011 — Ben Ri Electrónica v OHMI — Sacopa (LT LIGHT-THECNO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark LT LIGHT-THECNO — Earlier Community figurative mark LT — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

OJ C 370, 17.12.2011, p. 24–24 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

17.12.2011   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 370/24


Judgment of the General Court of 10 November 2011 — Ben Ri Electrónica v OHMI — Sacopa (LT LIGHT-THECNO)

(Case T-143/10) (1)

(Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark LT LIGHT-THECNO - Earlier Community figurative mark LT - Relative ground for refusal - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

2011/C 370/39

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Ben Ri Electrónica, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: A.I. Alejos Cutuli, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Sacopa, SAU (Sant Jaume de Llierca, Spain)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 February 2010 (Case R 1625/2008-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Ben Ri Electrónica, SA and Sacopa, SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 3 February 2010 (Case R 1625/2008-4);

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

3.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Ben-Ri Electrónica, SA.


(1)  OJ C 134, 22.5.2010.


Top