This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010FA0071
Case F-71/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 June 2012 — Cantisani v Commission (Civil Service — Members of the contract staff — Conference interpreter — Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations — Psychological harassment — Conflict of interest — Claim for compensation)
Case F-71/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 June 2012 — Cantisani v Commission (Civil Service — Members of the contract staff — Conference interpreter — Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations — Psychological harassment — Conflict of interest — Claim for compensation)
Case F-71/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 June 2012 — Cantisani v Commission (Civil Service — Members of the contract staff — Conference interpreter — Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations — Psychological harassment — Conflict of interest — Claim for compensation)
OJ C 217, 21.7.2012, p. 30–30
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
21.7.2012 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 217/30 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 June 2012 — Cantisani v Commission
(Case F-71/10) (1)
(Civil Service - Members of the contract staff - Conference interpreter - Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations - Psychological harassment - Conflict of interest - Claim for compensation)
2012/C 217/63
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Nicola Cantisani (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. de Lannoy, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and J. Barquero Cruz, Agents)
Re:
Application for the annulment of the defendant’s decision rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance in respect of psychological harassment and claim for compensation.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Mr Cantisani to bear his own costs and to pay those of the European Commission. |
(1) OJ C 317, 20.11.2010, p. 49.