This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010FA0068
Case F-68/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 September 2011 — Behnke v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — 2009 appraisal and promotion exercise — Statement of reasons of the opinion of the Joint Appraisal and Promotion Committee — Manifest error of assessment)
Case F-68/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 September 2011 — Behnke v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — 2009 appraisal and promotion exercise — Statement of reasons of the opinion of the Joint Appraisal and Promotion Committee — Manifest error of assessment)
Case F-68/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 September 2011 — Behnke v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — 2009 appraisal and promotion exercise — Statement of reasons of the opinion of the Joint Appraisal and Promotion Committee — Manifest error of assessment)
OJ C 340, 19.11.2011, p. 37–37
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
19.11.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 340/37 |
Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 September 2011 — Behnke v Commission
(Case F-68/10) (1)
(Civil Service - Officials - 2009 appraisal and promotion exercise - Statement of reasons of the opinion of the Joint Appraisal and Promotion Committee - Manifest error of assessment)
2011/C 340/74
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Thorsten Behnke (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Bersheid and C. Berardis-Kayser, Agents)
Re:
Application for annulment of the decision to classify the applicant in performance group II and to award him 5 promotion points in his career development report for the period from 1 January to 31 December 2008.
Operative part of the judgment
The Tribunal:
|
1. |
Dismisses the application; |
|
2. |
Orders the European Commission to pay, in addition to its own costs, one quarter of the costs incurred by Mr Behnke; |
|
3. |
Orders Mr Behnke to pay three quarters of his own costs. |
(1) OJ C 288, 23.10.10, p. 74.