This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62009TB0038
Case T-38/09: Order of the General Court of 9 December 2013 — El Corte Inglés v Commission (Customs Union — Import of textiles declared to have originated in Jamaica — Recovery ‘a posteriori’ of import duties — Application for remission of duties — Articles 220(2)(b) and 239 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Commission decision rejecting that application — Annulment by the national court of the decision of the national authorities to enter in the accounts duties a posteriori — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-38/09: Order of the General Court of 9 December 2013 — El Corte Inglés v Commission (Customs Union — Import of textiles declared to have originated in Jamaica — Recovery ‘a posteriori’ of import duties — Application for remission of duties — Articles 220(2)(b) and 239 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Commission decision rejecting that application — Annulment by the national court of the decision of the national authorities to enter in the accounts duties a posteriori — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-38/09: Order of the General Court of 9 December 2013 — El Corte Inglés v Commission (Customs Union — Import of textiles declared to have originated in Jamaica — Recovery ‘a posteriori’ of import duties — Application for remission of duties — Articles 220(2)(b) and 239 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Commission decision rejecting that application — Annulment by the national court of the decision of the national authorities to enter in the accounts duties a posteriori — No need to adjudicate)
OJ C 45, 15.2.2014, p. 29–29
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
15.2.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 45/29 |
Order of the General Court of 9 December 2013 — El Corte Inglés v Commission
(Case T-38/09) (1)
(Customs Union - Import of textiles declared to have originated in Jamaica - Recovery ‘a posteriori’ of import duties - Application for remission of duties - Articles 220(2)(b) and 239 of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Commission decision rejecting that application - Annulment by the national court of the decision of the national authorities to enter in the accounts duties a posteriori - No need to adjudicate)
2014/C 45/47
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. Baz and P. Muñiz, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Valero Jordana and L. Keppenne, acting as Agents)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Axstores AB, formerly Åhléns AB (Stockholm, Sweden) (represented initially by P. Fohlin and U. Käll, subsequently by U. Käll and T. Wetterlundh, lawyers)
Re:
Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 6317 final of 3 November 2008, finding, first, that it is justified to proceed to recovery a posteriori of those import duties not demanded from the applicant and, second, that the remission of those duties is not justified by the existence of a special situation, regarding the import of textiles declared to have originated in Jamaica (Case REM 03/07).
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
|
2. |
Each party shall bear its own costs. |