Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62009TA0466

    Case T-466/09: Judgment of the General Court of 5 July 2012 — Comercial Losan v OHIM — McDonald’s International Property (Mc. Baby) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark Mc. Baby — Earlier Community figurative mark Mc Kids. always quality. always fun! — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    OJ C 243, 11.8.2012, p. 16–17 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    11.8.2012   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 243/16


    Judgment of the General Court of 5 July 2012 — Comercial Losan v OHIM — McDonald’s International Property (Mc. Baby)

    (Case T-466/09) (1)

    (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark Mc. Baby - Earlier Community figurative mark Mc Kids. always quality. always fun! - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

    2012/C 243/30

    Language of the case: Spanish

    Parties

    Applicant: Comercial Losan, SLU (Zaragoza, Spain) (represented by: A. Vela Ballesteros, lawyer)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: McDonald’s International Property Co. Ltd (Wilmington, Delaware, United States)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 September 2009 (Case R 1706/2008-1) concerning opposition proceedings between McDonald’s International Property Co. Ltd and Comercial Losan, SLU.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Comercial Losan, SLU to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.


    Top