EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62009CA0464

Case C-464/09 P: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 December 2010 — Holland Malt BV v European Commission, Kingdom of the Netherlands (Appeal — State aid — Guidelines for aid in the agriculture sector — Point 4.2.5 — Malt market — No normal market outlets — Aid measure declared incompatible with the common market)

OJ C 30, 29.1.2011, p. 8–8 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

29.1.2011   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 30/8


Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 2 December 2010 — Holland Malt BV v European Commission, Kingdom of the Netherlands

(Case C-464/09 P) (1)

(Appeal - State aid - Guidelines for aid in the agriculture sector - Point 4.2.5 - Malt market - No normal market outlets - Aid measure declared incompatible with the common market)

2011/C 30/12

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Holland Malt BV (represented by: O. Brouwer, A. Stoffer and P. Schepens, advocaten)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, Agents) Kingdom of the Netherlands (represented by: C. Wissels and Y. de Vries, Agents)

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 9 September 2009 in Case T-369/06 Holland Malt BV v CommissionHolland Malt BV, supported by the Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission by which that Court dismissed an application for annulment of Commission Decision 2007/59/EC of 26 September 2006 declaring as incompatible with the common market the aid granted by the Netherlands in favour of Holland Malt BV for the creation of a malt production plant at Eemshaven (Groningen), in the form of investment aid of EUR 7 425 000, subject to the condition precedent of its approval by the Commission (State aid No C 14/2005 — ex N 149/2004) (OJ 2007 L 32, p. 76) — Application of the Guidelines for State aid in the agriculture sector

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

2.

Orders Holland Malt BV to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 24, 30.1.2010.


Top