Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62008TN0510

    Case T-510/08: Action brought on 20 November 2008 — Toqueville v OHIM — Schiesaro (TOCQUEVILLE 13)

    OJ C 19, 24.1.2009, p. 35–35 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    24.1.2009   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 19/35

    Action brought on 20 November 2008 — Toqueville v OHIM — Schiesaro (TOCQUEVILLE 13)

    (Case T-510/08)

    (2009/C 19/66)

    Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

    Parties

    Applicant: Toqueville Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: S. Bariatti, I. Palombella and E. Cucchiara, lawyers)

    Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Marco Schiesaro (Milan, Italy)

    Form of order sought

    —

    Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 August 2008 in Case R 829/2008-2 Toqueville Srl v M. Schiesaro.

    —

    Order the defendant to pay the costs.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: word mark ‘TOCQUEVILLE 13’ (Community trade mark No 1.406.982) to designate goods and services in Classes 25, 41 and 42.

    Proprietor of the Community trade mark: the applicant.

    Applicant for the declaration of invalidity: Marco Schiesaro.

    Decision challenged before the Board of Appeal: the decision of the Cancellation Division to grant the application for partial revocation of the trade mark in question.

    Decision of the Board of Appeal: declaration that the appeal is inadmissible and rejection of a request for restitutio in integrum as regards the time-limit for filing an appeal against the decision of the Cancellation Division.

    Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 73 and 78 if Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark, Articles 2 and 9 of Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 on the fees payable to the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market and Article 50 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 implementing Regulation (EC) No 40/94.

    Top