Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62008TN0092

Case T-92/08: Action brought on 22 February 2008 — Republic of Cyprus v Commission

OJ C 142, 7.6.2008, p. 28–29 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

7.6.2008   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/28

Action brought on 22 February 2008 — Republic of Cyprus v Commission

(Case T-92/08)

(2008/C 142/51)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: P. Kliridis)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

—

annul the procurement notice under reference EuropeAid/126111/C/SER/CY for the conclusion of a contract entitled ‘Technical Assistance to support the ongoing reform of the primary and secondary education sector’, which was published, only in English, on the webpage http://ec.europa.eu/europaid/tender/data/ on or around 14 December 2007, and annul points 5 and 28.2 of the notice;

—

order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The applicant submits that the notice is unlawful for the following reasons:

—

first, because, in issuing the notice, the Commission exceeded and/or infringed its legal basis, to be specific Council Regulation (EC) No 389/2006 of 27 February 2006 establishing an instrument of financial support for encouraging the economic development of the Turkish Cypriot community and amending Council Regulation (EC) No 2667/2000 on the European Agency for Reconstruction (1);

—

second, because the notice is contrary to and/or incompatible with Article 299 EC, as amended by Article 19 of the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic (2) (‘the 2003 Act of Accession’) and Protocol No 10, on Cyprus, to the 2003 Act of Accession (3);

—

third, because the notice is contrary to or incompatible with both obligations flowing from rules of mandatory international law and United Nations Security Council Resolutions 541(1983) and 550(1984);

—

fourth, because the notice is contrary to and/or incompatible with the principle of sincere cooperation between the institutions of the European Union and the Member States, as laid down under Article 10 EC; and

—

fifth, because the notice was not published in the Official Journal.

(1)  OJ 2006 L 65, p. 5.

(2)  OJ 2003 L 236, p. 33.

(3)  OJ 2003 L 236, p. 955.

Top