EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008TA0482

Case T-482/08: Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2010 — Atlas Transport v OHIM — Hartmann (ATLAS TRANSPORT) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark ATLAS TRANSPORT — Genuine use of the trade mark — Articles 15 and 50(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Articles 15 and 51(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))

OJ C 209, 31.7.2010, p. 35–35 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

31.7.2010   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 209/35


Judgment of the General Court of 10 June 2010 — Atlas Transport v OHIM — Hartmann (ATLAS TRANSPORT)

(Case T-482/08) (1)

(Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community word mark ATLAS TRANSPORT - Genuine use of the trade mark - Articles 15 and 50(1) of Regulation No 40/94 (now Articles 15 and 51(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))

2010/C 209/51

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Atlas Transport GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: U. Hildebrandt, K. Schmidt-Hern and B. Weichhaus, lawyers)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider and S. Schäffner, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Alfred Hartmann (Leer, Germany) (represented by C. Drews, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 September 2008 (Case R 1858/2007-4) relating to revocation proceedings between Alfred Hartmann and Atlas Transport GmbH.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Annuls the Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 9 September 2008 in Case R 1858/2007-4;

2.

Orders OHIM to bear its own costs as well as those incurred by Atlas Transport GmbH;

3.

Orders Alfred Hartmann to bear his own costs.


(1)  OJ C 32, 7.2.2009.


Top