Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62007TA0428

    Joined Cases T-428/07 and T-455/07: Judgment of the General Court of 17 June 2010 — CEVA v Commission (Arbitration clause — Contracts entered into under a specific research, technological development and demonstration programme in the field of ‘Quality of life and management of living resources (1998-2002)’ — Seahealth and Biopal projects — Debit notes — Applications for annulment — Reclassification of the actions — Admissibility — Rule that the parties should be heard and rights of the defence — Recovery of all the financial contributions paid by the European Union — Serious financial irregularities)

    OJ C 209, 31.7.2010, p. 33–33 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    31.7.2010   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 209/33


    Judgment of the General Court of 17 June 2010 — CEVA v Commission

    (Joined Cases T-428/07 and T-455/07) (1)

    (Arbitration clause - Contracts entered into under a specific research, technological development and demonstration programme in the field of ‘Quality of life and management of living resources (1998-2002)’ - Seahealth and Biopal projects - Debit notes - Applications for annulment - Reclassification of the actions - Admissibility - Rule that the parties should be heard and rights of the defence - Recovery of all the financial contributions paid by the European Union - Serious financial irregularities)

    2010/C 209/47

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: Centre d'étude et de valorisation des algues SA (CEVA) (Pleubian, France) (represented by: J.-M. Peyrical, lawyer)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially by L. Escobar Guerrero and W. Roels, then by W. Roels, acting as Agents, and E. Bouttier, lawyer)

    Re:

    Application for annulment, in Case T-428/07, of debit note No 3240908670 of 20 September 2007, relating to the Seahealth project and, in Case T-455/07, of debit note No 3240909271 of 4 October 2007, relating to the Biopal contract, and that the Commission be ordered to reimburse those debit notes in favour of CEVA.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the actions;

    2.

    Orders each party to bear half of its own costs and half of the costs incurred by the other party.


    (1)  OJ C 22, 26.1.2008.


    Top