Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62006TB0062

    Case T-62/06 RENV R: Order of the President of the General Court of 9 June 2011 — Eurallumina v Commission (Application for interim measures — State aid — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery — Application for suspension of operation — No urgency)

    OJ C 219, 23.7.2011, p. 16–16 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    23.7.2011   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 219/16

    Order of the President of the General Court of 9 June 2011 — Eurallumina v Commission

    (Case T-62/06 RENV R)

    (Application for interim measures - State aid - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the common market and ordering its recovery - Application for suspension of operation - No urgency)

    2011/C 219/22

    Language of the case: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Eurallumina SpA (Portoscuso, Italy) (represented by: R. Denton and L. Martin Alegi, Solicitors)

    Defendant: European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci, N. Khan, D. Grespan and K. Walkerová, Agents)

    Re:

    Application for suspension of operation of Commission Decision 2006/323/EC of 7 December 2005 concerning the exemption from excise duty on mineral oils used as fuel for alumina production in Gardanne, in the Shannon region and in Sardinia respectively implemented by France, Ireland and Italy (OJ 2006 L 119, p. 12) in so far as it concerns the applicant

    Operative part of the order

    1.

    The application for interim measures is dismissed.

    2.

    Costs are reserved.
    Top