Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 52020AT37956(01)

    Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on 1 July 2019 concerning a draft decision in Case AT.37956(2) – Ronds à Beton Rapporteur: Austria 2020/C 312/05

    C/2019/4969

    OJ C 312, 21.9.2020, p. 6–6 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    21.9.2020   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 312/6

    Opinion of the Advisory Committee on restrictive practices and dominant positions at its meeting on 1 July 2019 concerning a draft decision in Case AT.37956(2) – Ronds à Beton

    Rapporteur: Austria

    (2020/C 312/05)

    1.   

    The Advisory Committee (4 Member States) agrees with the Commission’s finding that the limitation period has not expired.

    2.   

    The Advisory Committee (4 Member States) agrees with the Commission that a fine should be imposed on the addressees of the draft decision.

    3.   

    The Advisory Committee (4 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the basic amounts of the fines.

    4.   

    The Advisory Committee (4 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the increase of the basic amount due to an aggravating circumstance for one of the parties.

    5.   

    The Advisory Committee (4 Member States) agrees with the application of mitigating circumstances for two parties for their non-participation, for a limited period, in one of the limbs of the conduct.

    6.   

    The Advisory Committee (4 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the application of an extraordinary mitigating circumstance in this case.

    7.   

    The Advisory Committee (4 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the amount of the extraordinary mitigating circumstance.

    8.   

    The Advisory Committee (4 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the amount of the reduction of the fine based on the 1996 Commission Notice on the non-imposition or reduction of fines in cartel cases for one of the parties.

    9.   

    The Advisory Committee (4 Member States) agrees with the Commission on the final amounts of the fines.

    10.   

    The Advisory Committee (4 Member States) recommends the publication of its Opinion in the Official Journal of the European Union.

    Top