6.6.2013   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/58

1.1

The EESC supports the proposed amendment to Article 9 of the Regulation in order to eliminate discrimination between Member States and associated countries and boost more active participation of associated countries in setting up and operating future ERICs.

1.2

The EESC believes that equality in voting rights will not affect the Community dimension of the Regulation and that the Community can retain enough control over essential elements of ERIC activities through other existing provisions in the Regulation.

1.3

The EESC is concerned about the slow pace at which the ERIC legal instrument is being applied to the setting up and operation of research infrastructure projects of European interest from the European Strategy Forum for Research Infrastructure (ESFRI) Roadmap. Therefore, it urges the Commission to provide maximum support to potential partners and thus facilitate use of the ERIC legal form.

1.4

The EESC would also recommend that the Community contributes more to the co-financing of ERIC projects, by ensuring better synergies between the Structural Funds and the Horizon 2020 Framework programme.

2.1

Top-class research infrastructure plays a crucial role in the advancement of knowledge and new technologies for a more competitive and knowledge-based European economy.

2.2

Although support and development of research infrastructure in Europe has been an ongoing objective of the Community for the last decade, the relative fragmentation and regionalisation (1) of this infrastructure have consistently been among the reasons for a lack of excellence.

2.3

In 2006 the ESFRI identified numerous key infrastructure projects of pan-European interest to be developed by 2020 (2). One major barrier to setting up such infrastructure between EU countries was the lack of an adequate legal framework for the creation of proper partnerships.

2.4

Therefore, in 2009 the Council adopted the ERIC Regulation (3). This specific legal instrument gives an ERIC a legal personality recognised in all Member States. It can also benefit from VAT and excise duty exemption, and may adopt its own procurement procedures.

3.1

According to the current Regulation, ERICs should have members from at least three Member States and may also include qualified associated countries (4) as well as third countries and specialised intergovernmental organisations. EU Member States always jointly hold the majority of voting rights in the Assembly.

3.2

Such an arrangement puts associated countries in an unequal and subordinate position in respect to their voting rights, even though they may be willing to make a substantial financial contribution to setting up and operating an ERIC (5).

3.3

In order to encourage associated countries to actively participate in ERICs, the amendment to Article 9 proposes a change, with only one Member State (of a minimum of three members) being needed to establish a Consortium. The other two members can be from associated countries. Associated countries would also be able to hold voting rights accordingly.

4.1

The EESC generally supports the amendment to the ERIC Regulation if it can boost the active participation of associated countries in setting up and operating ERICs, but would like to make the following remarks.

4.1.1

The main argument for the minimum of three Member States in the current Regulation was to assure the Community dimension of the Regulation  (6). In this respect the change from three to one seems quite radical.

4.1.2

The EESC recalls that this Regulation was primarily established to ensure efficient execution of Community research and technological infrastructure projects. The EESC therefore recognises the need for the Community to retain control over certain essential elements of ERIC activities.

4.1.3

On the other hand, the EESC notes some provisions in the current Regulation which may compensate for the potential weakening of the position of EU parties due to the amendment to Article 9, for example:

The EESC requires full assurance that the above provisions outweigh the proposed amendment to Article 9 and ensure enough control over ERIC activities.

4.1.4

The EESC expresses its concern that so far no associated countries or third states have joined an ERIC, and hopes that the unfavourable situation regarding voting rights was indeed the main reason for their lack of interest.

4.1.5

The EESC acknowledges with satisfaction that 19 of the 51 infrastructure projects in the ESFRI roadmap anticipate using the ERIC legal form for their establishment and operation. At the same time, the Committee is concerned that only 2 ERICs have been established since the Regulation entered into force, back in 2009.

4.1.6

The EESC would like to see this process being speeded up. It considers that the reasons for such slow progress include the complex and demanding administrative and legal procedures required to establish an ERIC. Therefore, the EESC urges the Commission to provide support measures and tools for potential partners in order to facilitate their work (templates for statutes, practical guidelines, specific support measures for ERICs under Horizon 2020, etc.)

4.1.7

Although not directly related to the proposed amendment to the Regulation, the EESC would like to reiterate its recommendation that the Community contributes more actively to the co-financing of ERIC projects by increasing the funds for research infrastructures in the Horizon 2020 framework programme, and in particular by increasing synergies between Horizon 2020 and the Structural Funds.