Agħżel il-karatteristiċi sperimentali li tixtieq tipprova

Dan id-dokument hu mislut mis-sit web tal-EUR-Lex

Dokument 62012TN0475

Case T-475/12: Action brought on 29 October 2012 — LaserSoft Imaging v OHIM (WorkflowPilot)

OJ C 9, 12.1.2013, p. 41–41 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

12.1.2013   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 9/41


Action brought on 29 October 2012 — LaserSoft Imaging v OHIM (WorkflowPilot)

(Case T-475/12)

2013/C 9/73

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: LaserSoft Imaging AG (Kiel, Germany) (represented by J. Hunnekuhl, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

Annul the decisions of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 10 January 2012 and 6 August 2012 (Case R 480/2012-4) in so far as they rejected the applicant’s trade mark application of 29 August 2011 and order the defendant to register the word mark ‘WorkflowPilot’ in the trade mark register of the Office for Harmonisation for the Internal Market in accordance with the application.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘WorkflowPilot’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 41 and 42 — Community trade mark application No 10 223 774

Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected in part

Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and of Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009


Fuq