Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62007TN0049

Case T-49/07: Action brought on 20 February 2007 — Fahas v Council

OJ C 95, 28.4.2007, p. 43–44 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

28.4.2007   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/43

Action brought on 20 February 2007 — Fahas v Council

(Case T-49/07)

(2007/C 95/90)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Sofiane Fahas (Milkendorf, Germany) (represented by: F. Zillmer, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Form of order sought

—

Annul Decision 2002/848/EC of 28 October 2002 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 and repealing Decision 2002/460/EC, by which the Council drew up an updated list of persons, groups and entities to which that regulation applies, and all decisions adopted in the meantime by the Council of the European Union in the meantime including Decision 2006/1008/EC of 21 December 2006, which is currently in force, in so far as they concern the applicant;

—

declare all aforementioned decisions up to and including Decision 2006/1008/EC of 21 December 2006 inapplicable to the applicant;

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the applicant damages for the harm suffered, the amount to be determined at the Court's discretion, but at least EUR 2 000;

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

By its application, the applicant challenge Decision 2006/1008/EC (1) and all previous decisions since Decision 2002/848/EC (2), in so far as he is expressly listed in the contested legislation.

In support of his claim, the applicant alleges infringement of his right to a fair hearing and his right to effective legal protection. In addition, Decision 2006/1008/EC is unfounded and thus is in breach of Article 253 EC.

(1)  Council Decision 2006/1008/EC of 21 December 2006 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism (OJ 2006 L 379, p. 123).

(2)  Council Decision 2002/848/EC of 28 October 2002 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2002/460/EC (OJ 2002 L 295, p. 12).

Top