EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2007/082/15
Case C-12/05 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 December 2006 — Herbert Meister v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Employment — Reassignment of a head of service as legal adviser to the Vice-President for Legal Affairs — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Case C-12/05 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 December 2006 — Herbert Meister v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Employment — Reassignment of a head of service as legal adviser to the Vice-President for Legal Affairs — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
Case C-12/05 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 December 2006 — Herbert Meister v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Employment — Reassignment of a head of service as legal adviser to the Vice-President for Legal Affairs — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
OJ C 82, 14.4.2007, p. 8–8
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
14.4.2007 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 82/8 |
Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 December 2006 — Herbert Meister v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
(Case C-12/05 P) (1)
(Appeal - Employment - Reassignment of a head of service as legal adviser to the Vice-President for Legal Affairs - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
(2007/C 82/15)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Appellant: Herbert Meister (represented by: P. Goergen, lawyer)
Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: I. de Medrano Caballero, Agent)
Re:
Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 28 October 2004 in Case T-76/03 Meister v OHIM, in which the Court of First Instance dismissed the action for annulment of OHIM's decision of 22 April 2002 appointing the appellant, in the interest of the service, with his post, as legal adviser to the Vice-President for Legal Affairs
Operative part of the order
1. |
The appeal and cross-appeal are dismissed; |
2. |
Mr Meister is ordered to pay the costs of the appeal; |
3. |
The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) is ordered to pay the costs of the cross-appeal. |