EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Brussels, 12.7.2022
COM(2022) 342 final
Recommendation for a
COUNCIL DECISION
authorising the opening of negotiations on behalf of the European Union for an international agreement on plastic pollution
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 52022PC0342
Recommendation for a COUNCIL DECISION authorising the opening of negotiations on behalf of the European Union for an international agreement on plastic pollution
Recommendation for a COUNCIL DECISION authorising the opening of negotiations on behalf of the European Union for an international agreement on plastic pollution
Recommendation for a COUNCIL DECISION authorising the opening of negotiations on behalf of the European Union for an international agreement on plastic pollution
COM/2022/342 final
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Brussels, 12.7.2022
COM(2022) 342 final
Recommendation for a
COUNCIL DECISION
authorising the opening of negotiations on behalf of the European Union for an international agreement on plastic pollution
EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1.CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL
•Reasons for and objectives of the proposal
The Resolution 5/14 “End Plastic Pollution: towards an international legally binding instrument” 1 , adopted by the United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA) in March 2022, sets out a mandate for negotiations by an Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee (INC) of an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution, including in the marine environment. The INC is expected to conclude its work by the end of 2024, with a first meeting to take place in 2022. UNEA may extend this mandate in time, if needed.
Resolution 5/14 was adopted following a series of UNEA resolutions since 2014, with UNEA3 representing a key milestone with UN Member States supporting a number of actions to eliminate the discharge of plastic litter and microplastics into the ocean and the establishment of an ad-hoc open-ended expert group on marine litter and micro-plastics (AHEG) to explore barriers to combating marine litter and microplastics. The AHEG concluded its work in 2020. It identified a number of response options to the global crisis of plastic pollution, including a global agreement on plastics, supported by majority of participants of the expert group, representing almost all regions. In October 2021 the UN report “From Pollution to Solution: a Global Assessment of Marine Litter and Plastic Pollution” 2 was published to inform UNEA 5.2 on the extent and aspects of global marine litter and plastic pollution.
Following a like-minded meeting hosted by the European Commission in 2020, Peru and Rwanda prepared a resolution with the objective of launching negotiations for a new international agreement on plastic pollution at UNEA5. Several international events, including a Ministerial Conference on Marine Litter and Plastic Pollution hosted by Germany, Ecuador, Vietnam and Ghana in 2021, contributed to building momentum for the resolution and ultimately resulted in final adoption of the resolution by consensus.
The objective of this Recommendation is to ensure a consistent and efficient negotiation position of the European Union (EU) in the sessions of the INC, with a view to negotiating and concluding an international legally binding instrument on plastic pollution.
•Consistency with existing policy provisions in the policy area
The launch of negotiations for an international agreement on plastics is a key achievement of the European Union’s Green Deal, the Circular Economy Action Plan. 3 and linked to a significant number of EU policies and legislation including on the protection of the marine and coastal environment, notably the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) 4 . Ensuring an international agreement on plastics that tackles plastic pollution at its source instead of engaging at costly and not fully effective end of pipe solutions has thus been one of the Union’s key environmental priorities for global action over the past few years.
This follows from dedicated and progressive Union policy initiatives and legislation on plastics in recent times 5 . In 2018, a Plastics Strategy 6 , forming part of the Circular Economy Action Plan 7 , set forth a blueprint to protect our environment and reduce marine litter, greenhouse gas emissions and our dependence on imported fossil fuels. 8 Concrete action on plastics includes the impact of certain plastic products on the environment 9 , single use plastics 10 , the role of plastics in the circular economy 11 , ecodesign requirements and labelling 12 , plastics and packaging waste 13 and the upcoming initiatives on intentionally added and un-intentionally released microplastics 14 . The Strategy also analysed the potential for harnessing global action, identifying the need (inter alia) for the development of international standards to boost industry confidence in the quality of recyclable or recycled plastics. In relation to waste shipments, it noted the importance of ensuring that any plastics sent abroad for recycling are handled and processed under conditions similar to those applicable in the EU, supporting action on waste management under the Basel Convention, and it proposed development of an EU certification scheme for recycling plants. It called for a global industry effort to promote widespread use of recyclable and recycled plastics.
In the frame of the Circular Economy Action Plan, the Commission will additionally propose mandatory requirements for recycled content and waste reduction measures for key products such as packaging, construction materials and vehicles.
Under the abovementioned MSFD, in September 2020 15 the EU and its Member States agreed that there should be no more than 20 litter items per 100 meters of coastline, placing the EU in a frontrunner position for fulfilling SDG 14.1, which requires to “By 2025, prevent and significantly reduce marine pollution (…) including marine debris (…)”. The support activities underpinning the implementation of the EU Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD), executed in close collaboration with the Regional Sea Conventions, have demonstrated that harmonisation of monitoring, data acquisition and handling in the different environmental matrices is crucial for enabling prioritisation of efforts and for the verification of effectiveness of measures against plastic litter. Under the MSFD Common Implementation Strategy, the Technical Group on Marine Litter 16 is, in close collaboration with Regional Sea Conventions, providing technical harmonisation and collaborates with EMODnet, providing a data platform for marine litter data 17 .
The new international agreement will address plastic pollution, including in the marine environment. Pollution and the tackling of its sources is also a key priority of the European Green Deal, most recently in the Commission’s strategy on Zero Pollution to air, water and soil and the Chemicals Strategy on Sustainability. The recently adopted Zero Pollution Action Plan set reduction targets for 2030 (i. e. to reduce plastic litter at sea by 50 % and microplastics released into the environment by 30%), further boosting the effectiveness of EU policies against marine litter and its impacts. Addressing plastic pollution at a global level thus very much dovetails with multiple existing Union policies and legislation relating to the protection of the environment from pollution. This can include waste 18 , shipments of waste 19 , chemicals 20 , bathing water 21 , and other (such as Urban Waste Water Treatment and Water Framework Directives) 22 .
The EU contributes substantially to international initiatives directly related to curbing plastic pollution, such as the implementation of the Basel Convention on the transboundary shipments of waste, as recently amended with enhanced controls on plastic waste, 23 and the IMO (International Maritime Organisation) Action Plan against plastic litter and microplastics. Furthermore, the EU participates actively in all actions against plastic pollution in the marine regions around Europe (through technical and financial support to the Regional Action Plans in Mediterranean, Black Sea, Baltic and Northeast Atlantic) and with its G7 and G20 partners. The EU has also co-sponsored an initiative in the WTO that addresses plastic pollution and sustainable plastics trade.
Plastics and its pollution permeate well beyond environmental policy considerations. The section below sets out its crosscutting relevance to diverse policies across the Union’s remit.
•Consistency with other Union policies
The proposed Recommendation is also consistent with other Union policies and legislation, such as on:
·health, specifically those policies and actions regarding materials and articles intended to come into contact with food 24 ,Union policies on the protection of the marine and coastal environment,
·port reception facilities 25 ,
·EU Sustainable Finance Taxonomy, particularly in respect of “do no serious harm” criteria for plastic packaging and other plastic products,
·Future development of Ecodesign criteria including for packaging and other plastic products placed on the EU Single Market,
·The proposed revision of the Waste Shipments Regulation,
·Basel and Stockholm Conventions,
·Development cooperation and international partnerships,
·Bilateral and multilateral relations,
·Union policy on Persistent Organic Pollutants within the framework of the Stockholm Convention, with several plastic additives listed or proposed for listing, and
·Chemicals policy, including REACH restrictions on microplastics and plastic additives and the recently published Restriction Roadmap 26 , which targets widely used additives (such as flame retardants) and PVC.
2.LEGAL BASIS, SUBSIDIARITY AND PROPORTIONALITY
•Legal basis
The procedural legal basis for the proposed decision is Article 218(3) and (4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU).
Article 218(3) of the TFEU provides that the Commission shall submit recommendations to the Council, which shall adopt a decision authorising the opening of negotiations and nominating the Union negotiator. According to Article 218(4) of the TFEU, the Council may address directives to the negotiator and designate a special committee in consultation with which the negotiations must be concluded.
The agreement should be based on the precautionary principle and on the principles that preventive action should be taken, that environmental damage should as a priority be reflected at source, and on the polluter pays principle, with the specific basis to be considered at a later stage once more information is available on the scope and content of the international agreement on plastic pollution.
•Subsidiarity
Although its exact scope is not yet known, the envisaged international agreement is intended to address plastic pollution through measures along the entire lifecycle of plastics, including product design, production, consumption, use and the sound management of plastic waste. The foregoing sections on the policy area and its related policy links under the Union’s remit, aptly demonstrate the leading role that the Union has played to date and the appropriateness of handling negotiations for the envisaged agreement at Union level.
The envisaged agreement will therefore have an inevitable impact on the exercise of Union competences and on Union legislation in areas such as (in particular) environment, trade and internal market, all of which might become relevant as the negotiations on specific provisions unfold.
In view of the above and the likely affectation of existing Union provisions (in particular those covering the ‘policy area’ listed under Heading 1) in different areas of the Union’s action, it is essential that the participation of the Union in the future negotiations and resulting international agreement is assured.
•Proportionality
This will be the first multilateral agreement addressing plastic pollution by a holistic approach covering both the upstream and the downstream part of the plastic life cycle. Several national and regional initiatives that address plastic pollution, including marine plastic pollution, already exist, but they have not proven sufficient to respond to the global challenge of plastic pollution. The Ad-hoc Open-Ended Working Group on Marine Litter and Micro-Plastics, established at the third session of the UNEA in response to UNEP/EA.3/Res.7 Marine Litter and Microplastics, and which concluded its work in November 2020, identified a global agreement on plastics as a key response option to the global crisis. At UNEA 5 the Resolution 5/14 “End plastic pollution: towards an international legally binding instrument”, which called UNEP’s Executive Director to establish the INC, was adopted.
A Council Decision is necessary to authorise the opening of negotiations by the Union on a global agreement on plastics in order to address plastic pollution.
The proposed recommendation does not go beyond what is necessary for achieving the objectives pursued, in accordance with Article 5(4) of the Treaty on European Union (TEU).
•Choice of the instrument
The choice of the instrument is stipulated in Article 218(3) and 218(4) of the TFEU.
3.RESULTS OF EX-POST EVALUATIONS, STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATIONS AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
•Ex-post evaluations/fitness checks of existing legislation
Not applicable.
•Stakeholder consultations
Not applicable.
•Collection and use of expertise
Not applicable.
•Impact assessment
Not applicable.
•Regulatory fitness and simplification
Not applicable.
•Fundamental rights
According to Article 37 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, a high level of environmental protection and the improvement of the quality of the environment must be integrated into the policies of the Union and ensured in accordance with the principle of sustainable development.
The proposed recommendation seeks authorisation for the opening of negotiations with a view to address plastic pollution, not only in marine environments, but also on land, by addressing the entire plastic life cycle. This would have a positive impact upon the right on environmental protection, as enshrined in Article 37 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
According to Article 37 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Union policies shall ensure a high level of consumer protection.
The proposed recommendations would equally positively impact upon the right on consumer protection by also taking into account the upstream part of the plastic life cycle, i.e. product design, production and labelling of plastic products.
According to Article 3(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, everyone has the right to respect for his or her physical and mental integrity.
The proposed recommendation would positively impact upon the right to the integrity of the person as well, as it also aims to tackle the risks plastic pollution, in particular microplastics, is posing to the human physical health.
4.BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS
The exact budgetary implications of this initiative are impossible to determine at this stage insofar as its scope and key elements remain to be multilaterally negotiated. There will be a negotiation process with numerous INC meetings until a Diplomatic Conference expected not before 2024.
5.OTHER ELEMENTS
•Implementation plans and monitoring, evaluation and reporting arrangements
A preparatory meeting (Open-ended Working Group/OEWG) on organisational matters pertaining to the INC took place from 30 May to 1 June 2022 in Dakar, Senegal.
Negotiations proper on the new instrument will start at the first meeting of the INC in the second half of 2022 (date and venue tbc).
•Explanatory documents (for directives)
No.
•Detailed explanation of the specific provisions of the proposal
The Commission recommends that:
·The Council authorises the Commission to open and conduct negotiations for the conclusion of a new international agreement on plastic pollution,
·The Commission is nominated as Union negotiator,
·The Commission conducts the negotiations in consultation with the special committee if designated by the Council in accordance with Article 218(4) TFEU,
·The Council approves the negotiating directives annexed to this recommendation.
Recommendation for a
COUNCIL DECISION
authorising the opening of negotiations on behalf of the European Union for an international agreement on plastic pollution
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty in the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 218(3) and (4) thereof,
Having regard to the recommendation from the European Commission,
Whereas:
(1)The United Nations Environment Assembly at its Fifth Session from 28 February to 2 March 2022 adopted the Resolution “End plastic pollution: towards an international legally binding instrument” (5/14) establishing an intergovernmental negotiating committee to negotiate a new international agreement to address plastic pollution, including in the marine environments, with a view to address the entire life cycle of plastics.
(2)The Union, should participate in the negotiations on such convention, agreement or other international instrument,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
The Commission is hereby authorised to negotiate on behalf of the Union an international agreement on plastics to end plastic pollution as set out in the UNEA-5.2 Resolution 5/14.
Article 2
The negotiating directives are set out in the Annex.
Article 3
The negotiations shall be conducted in consultation with the [name of the special committee to be inserted by the Council].
Article 4
This Decision is addressed to the Commission.
Done at Brussels,
For the Council
The President
EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Brussels, 12.7.2022
COM(2022) 342 final
ANNEX
to the
Recommendation for a Council Decision
authorising the opening of negotiations on behalf of the European Union for an international agreement on plastic pollution
ANNEX
DIRECTIVES FOR THE NEGOTIATION OF AN INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT ON PLASTIC POLLUTION
(1)Within the framework of the intergovernmental process set out in Resolution 5/14 adopted by the Fifth Session of the United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA), which provides a globally inclusive negotiating forum, the Commission, will aim at negotiating an international agreement on plastic pollution 1 (hereinafter, the “Plastics Agreement”).
(2)The Commission, on behalf of the European Union, shall endeavour to achieve a comprehensive negotiated outcome, which encompasses the objectives and principles outlined below.
(3)The Plastics Agreement will set out legally-binding and non-binding approaches for its Parties to reduce plastic pollution and increase the overall sustainability and circularity of plastics from a life-cycle perspective. The exact scope of the envisaged international agreement is not yet known, but the mandate for the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee emphasizes that it should include measures throughout the entire plastic life cycle, including plastic design, production, consumption and waste management including the generation of secondary raw materials.
(4)The obligations should be framed, including in the Plastics Agreement’s preamble, by a series of general objectives, principles and where appropriate, targets to enhance the sustainable and circular production and consumption and waste management of plastics in order to protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial and marine ecosystems, conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development, reduce emissions of greenhouse gases related to plastics, as well as to ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns, including sustainable levels of production and consumption of plastics and the ban or phasing out of materials and products where appropriate. The principles should include:
–Recognition of design for circularity and sustainability as the basis for avoiding waste and ensuring long lasting/durable plastic products that are easily reusable and/or recyclable to high quality (for instance, fostering the inclusion of recycled plastics in new products);
–Focus on the plastics that are responsible for the majority of waste generation and pollution (including marine pollution) and that could potentially be substituted for by more durable and sustainable products, products with lower environmental impact or other materials (where the lifecycle impacts are lower);
–The elimination of compounds and additives to plastics that compromise their sustainability and circularity, including oxo-degradable plastics and hazardous additives (such as lead and cadmium-based substances, flame retardants, phthalates, PFAS);
–Particular attention to the effects of microplastics, which are directly emitted in a form that is bioavailable to organisms and cannot be removed once they are in the environment, and the need to eliminate the intentional application of micro-plastics in various products where alternatives are available, and to address the unintentional release of microplastics;
–Recognition of the need to ensure a proper circular management and overall environmental benefits of biobased and biodegradable plastics, even though they represent only a small percentage of plastics on the global market;
–The central importance of separate collection of plastic waste as a means to render environmentally sound management of waste, including recycling, viable, and to improve the overall waste management in line with the waste hierarchy;
–Recognition that society (via taxpayers) and the environment should not pay the external costs of plastic waste management, litter collection and pollution, and that extended producer responsibility schemes should be applied to ensure that these costs are borne by those placing plastics or products containing plastics on the market;
–Implementation of the waste hierarchy, with longer use, re-use and prevention of waste as the ultimate priority, with particular focus on waste reduction measures for key products and on combatting litter, including in the marine environment;
–Agreement that plastic waste shipments should require undertakings that the destination country/installation is capable of managing, processing and recycling the waste to high standards, with respect to the Basel Agreement where applicable.
The objectives should take into account: i) the right to a clean and healthy environment as recognized by the UN Human Rights Council, ii) international solidarity, iii) the timely sharing of data, indicators, assessments and information on products and materials, iv) adequate and streamlined national/regional and global monitoring of progress, reporting and verification, v) facilitating research, assessments and knowledge, and enabling the public to avail, use and understand verified and timely information, and vi) the need to address the close links between human, animal and environmental health. The principle of equity should guide the work, including through disability-sensitive and gender-responsive approaches.
(5)The Plastics Agreement should also include provisions setting out:
–The institutional framework;
–Rules on future rule-making;
–Monitoring, making data publicly available, compliance and accountability mechanisms in all stages of the lifecycle: i) raw materials for the production of plastics; ii) manufacturing of plastic and plastic products, including design; iii) consumption/use of plastic products; iv) waste management, plastic litter and microplastics pollution;
–Country obligations and ownership as well as “whole of government”/cross sectorial approaches leading to better mobilisation of all competencies and resources as well as coherence in the prevention of plastic pollution, reducing plastic waste generation a shift to sustainable consumption and production and response at global, regional, national and community/local levels; and
–Financial support, technical assistance and capacity building aimed at:
–The effective implementation of Plastics Agreement and related commitments and
–The improvement of national and regional mechanisms for plastic pollution prevention, monitoring, data, indicators, reporting and verification, preparedness, and response (including inter-agency and inter-sectoral coordination mechanisms);
–Rules on plastic waste treatment through the implementation of measures such as extended producer responsibility schemes, putting onus on the polluters not only on public bodies or financial institutions
inextricably linked to the above categories of provisions or to the effectiveness of the Plastic Agreement in the light of its general objectives and principles.
(6)The Plastics Agreement should aim at laying down substantive provisions and commitments especially in the key areas indicated above, while also charting the course for future negotiations, including by means of annexes and/or protocols. Legally binding provisions could be complemented by non-binding provisions (such as guidelines, standards and declarations).
(7)All United Nations Member States and regional (economic) integration organisations to which its Member States have transferred competences over matters related to the provisions of the agreement should be allowed to become parties of the Plastic Agreement or any of its protocols. The Commission should ensure that the future Plastics Agreement contains appropriate provisions, following those of recent multilateral environmental agreements, enabling the Union to become a Contracting Party thereto. Specific arrangements for cooperation with relevant international organisations and non-governmental stakeholders should also be set out.
(8)Transitional periods for implementation and related implementation support should also be considered, with particular attention to the needs of low and lower-middle income countries.
(9)The Commission will represent the Union in the Inter-governmental Negotiating Committee in charge of developing a Plastics Agreement, as set out in the UNEA Resolution 5/14, and any preparatory or related body.
(10)The Commission should endeavour to ensure that the Plastics Agreement is consistent with relevant Union legislation and policies, as well as the Union’s commitments under other relevant multilateral agreements.
(11)The Commission should conduct negotiations in accordance with relevant Union legislation in force.