This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 02014O0060-20210628
Guideline (EU) 2015/510 of the European Central Bank of 19 December 2014 on the implementation of the Eurosystem monetary policy framework (General Documentation Guideline) (ECB/2014/60) (recast)
Consolidated text: Guideline (EU) 2015/510 of the European Central Bank of 19 December 2014 on the implementation of the Eurosystem monetary policy framework (General Documentation Guideline) (ECB/2014/60) (recast)
Guideline (EU) 2015/510 of the European Central Bank of 19 December 2014 on the implementation of the Eurosystem monetary policy framework (General Documentation Guideline) (ECB/2014/60) (recast)
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/guideline/2015/510/2021-06-28
02014O0060 — EN — 28.06.2021 — 011.001
This text is meant purely as a documentation tool and has no legal effect. The Union's institutions do not assume any liability for its contents. The authentic versions of the relevant acts, including their preambles, are those published in the Official Journal of the European Union and available in EUR-Lex. Those official texts are directly accessible through the links embedded in this document
►M2 GUIDELINE (EU) 2015/510 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK of 19 December 2014 on the implementation of the Eurosystem monetary policy framework (General Documentation Guideline) (ECB/2014/60) ◄ (OJ L 091 2.4.2015, p. 3) |
Amended by:
|
|
Official Journal |
||
No |
page |
date |
||
GUIDELINE (EU) 2015/732 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK of 16 April 2015 |
L 116 |
22 |
7.5.2015 |
|
GUIDELINE (EU) 2015/1938 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK of 27 August 2015 |
L 282 |
41 |
28.10.2015 |
|
GUIDELINE (EU) 2016/64 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK of 18 November 2015 |
L 14 |
25 |
21.1.2016 |
|
GUIDELINE (EU) 2016/2298 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK of 2 November 2016 |
L 344 |
102 |
17.12.2016 |
|
GUIDELINE (EU) 2017/1362 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK of 18 May 2017 |
L 190 |
26 |
21.7.2017 |
|
GUIDELINE (EU) 2018/570 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK of 7 February 2018 |
L 95 |
23 |
13.4.2018 |
|
GUIDELINE (EU) 2019/1032 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK of 10 May 2019 |
L 167 |
64 |
24.6.2019 |
|
DECISION (EU) 2020/506 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK of 7 April 2020 |
L 109I |
1 |
7.4.2020 |
|
GUIDELINE (EU) 2020/1690 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK of 25 September 2020 |
L 379 |
77 |
13.11.2020 |
|
GUIDELINE (EU) 2021/889 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK of 6 May 2021 |
L 196 |
1 |
3.6.2021 |
Corrected by:
GUIDELINE (EU) 2015/510 OF THE EUROPEAN CENTRAL BANK
of 19 December 2014
on the implementation of the Eurosystem monetary policy framework (General Documentation Guideline) (ECB/2014/60)
(recast)
CONTENTS |
|
PART ONE — |
SUBJECT MATTER, SCOPE AND DEFINITIONS |
PART TWO — |
THE EUROSYSTEM MONETARY POLICY TOOLS, OPERATIONS, INSTRUMENTS AND PROCEDURES |
TITLE I — |
Open market operations |
Chapter 1 — |
Overview of open market operations |
Chapter 2 — |
Categories of open market operations |
Chapter 3 — |
Instruments for open market operations |
TITLE II — |
Standing facilities |
Chapter 1 — |
Marginal lending facility |
Chapter 2 — |
Deposit facility |
TITLE III — |
Procedures for Eurosystem monetary policy operations |
Chapter 1 — |
Tender and bilateral procedures for Eurosystem open market operations |
Section 1 — |
Tender procedures |
Section 2 — |
Operational steps for tender procedures |
Subsection 1 — |
Announcement of tender procedures |
Subsection 2 — |
Preparation and submission of bids by counterparties |
Subsection 3 — |
Tender allotment |
Subsection 4 — |
Announcement of tender results |
Section 3 — |
Bilateral procedures for Eurosystem open market operations |
Chapter 2 — |
Settlement procedures for Eurosystem monetary policy operations |
PART THREE — |
ELIGIBLE COUNTERPARTIES |
PART FOUR — |
ELIGIBLE ASSETS |
TITLE I — |
General principles |
TITLE II — |
Eligibility criteria and credit quality requirements for marketable assets |
Chapter 1 — |
Eligibility criteria for marketable assets |
Section 1 — |
General eligibility criteria for marketable assets |
Section 2 — |
Specific eligibility criteria for certain types of marketable assets |
Subsection 1 — |
Specific eligibility criteria for asset-backed securities |
Subsection 2 — |
Specific eligibility criteria for covered bonds backed by asset-backed securities |
Subsection 3 — |
Specific eligibility criteria for debt certificates issued by the eurosystem |
Subsection 4— |
Specific eligibility criteria for certain unsecured debt instruments |
Chapter 2 — |
Eurosystem's credit quality requirements for marketable assets |
TITLE III — |
Eligibility criteria and credit quality requirements for non-marketable assets |
Chapter 1 — |
Eligibility criteria for non-marketable assets |
Section 1 — |
Eligibility criteria for credit claims |
Section 2 — |
Eligibility criteria for fixed-term deposits |
Section 3 — |
Eligibility criteria for RMBDs |
Section 4 — |
Eligibility criteria for DECCs |
Chapter 2 — |
Eurosystem's credit quality requirements for non-marketable assets |
Section 1 — |
Eurosystem's credit quality requirements for credit claims |
Section 2 — |
Eurosystem's credit quality requirements for RMBDs |
Section 3 — |
The Eurosystem's credit quality requirements for DECCs |
TITLE IV — |
Guarantees for marketable and non-marketable assets |
TITLE V — |
Eurosystem credit assessment framework for eligible assets |
TITLE VI — |
Risk control and valuation framework of marketable and non-marketable assets |
Chapter 1 — |
Risk control measures for marketable assets |
Chapter 2 — |
Risk control measures for non-marketable assets |
Chapter 3 — |
Valuation rules for marketable and non-marketable assets |
TITLE VII — |
Acceptance of non euro-denominated collateral in contingencies |
TITLE VIII — |
Rules for the use of eligible assets |
TITLE IX — |
Cross-border use of eligible assets |
PART FIVE — |
SANCTIONS IN THE EVENT OF A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COUNTERPARTY OBLIGATIONS |
PART SIX — |
DISCRETIONARY MEASURES |
PART SEVEN — |
ADDITIONAL MINIMUM COMMON FEATURES IN RELATION TO EUROSYSTEM MONETARY POLICY OPERATIONS |
Chapter 1 — |
Additional minimum common features applicable to all arrangements for Eurosystem monetary policy operations |
Chapter 2 — |
Additional minimum common features applicable to both repurchase and collateralised loan agreements |
Chapter 3 — |
Additional minimum common features exclusive to repurchase agreements |
Chapter 4 — |
Additional minimum common features exclusive to collateralised loan arrangements |
Chapter 5 — |
Additional minimum common features exclusive to foreign exchange swaps for monetary policy purposes |
PART EIGHT — |
FINAL PROVISIONS |
ANNEX I — |
Minimum reserves |
ANNEX II — |
Announcement of tender operations |
ANNEX III — |
Allotment of tenders and tender procedures |
ANNEX IV — |
Announcement of tender results |
ANNEX V — |
Criteria for the selection of counterparties to participate in foreign exchange intervention operations |
ANNEX VI — |
Cross-border use of eligible assets |
ANNEX VIa — |
Eligibility criteria for the use of securities settlement systems and links between securities settlement systems in Eurosystem credit operations |
ANNEX VII — |
Calculation of sanctions to be applied in accordance with part five and financial penalties to be applied in accordance with part seven |
ANNEX VIII — |
Loan-level data reporting requirements for asset-backed securities and the requirements for loan-level data repositories |
ANNEX IX — |
Eurosystem credit assessment framework performance monitoring process |
ANNEX IXa — |
Minimum coverage requirements for external credit assessment institutions in the Eurosystem credit assessment framework |
ANNEX IXb — |
Minimum requirements in the Eurosystem credit assessment framework for new issue and surveillance reports on covered bond programmes |
ANNEX IXc — |
ECAI acceptance criteria and application process |
ANNEX XI — |
Security forms |
ANNEX XII — |
Examples of Eurosystem monetary policy operations and procedure |
ANNEX XIIa — |
|
ANNEX XIII — |
Correlation table |
ANNEX XIV — |
Repealed Guideline with list of its successive amendments |
PART ONE
SUBJECT MATTER, SCOPE AND DEFINITIONS
Article 1
Subject matter and scope
Article 2
Definitions
For the purposes of this Guideline, the following definitions shall apply:
‘actual/360 day-count convention’ means the convention applied in Eurosystem monetary policy operations which determines the actual number of calendar days included in the calculation of interest by using a 360-day year as the basis;
‘agency’ means an entity that is established in a Member State whose currency is the euro and that either engages in certain common-good activities carried out at national or regional level or serves their funding needs, and which the Eurosystem has classified as an agency. The list of entities classified as agencies shall be published on the ECB's website and shall specify whether the quantitative criteria for valuation haircut purposes set out in Annex XIIa are met in respect of each entity;
‘asset-backed securities’ (ABSs) means debt instruments that are backed by a pool of ring fenced financial assets (fixed or revolving), that convert into cash within a finite time period. In addition, rights or other assets may exist that ensure the servicing or timely distribution of proceeds to the holders of the security. Generally, asset-backed securities are issued by a specially created investment vehicle which has acquired the pool of financial assets from the originator or seller. In this regard, payments on the asset-backed securities depend primarily on the cash flows generated by the assets in the underlying pool and other rights designed to assure timely payment, such as liquidity facilities, guarantees or other features generally known as credit enhancements;
‘bilateral procedure’ means a procedure whereby the NCBs or, in exceptional circumstances the ECB, conduct fine-tuning operations or outright transactions, directly with one or more counterparties, or through stock exchanges or market agents, without making use of tender procedures;
‘book-entry system’ means a system that enables transfers of securities and other financial assets which do not involve the physical movement of paper documents or certificates, e.g. the electronic transfer of securities;
‘business day’ means: (a) in relation to an obligation to make a payment, any day on which TARGET2 is operational to effect such a payment; or (b) in relation to an obligation to deliver assets, any day on which the SSS through which delivery is to be made is open for business in the place where delivery of the relevant securities is to be effected;
‘central securities depository’ (CSD) means a central securities depository as defined in point (1) of Article 2(1) of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 1 );
‘collateralised loan’ means an arrangement between an NCB and a counterparty whereby liquidity is provided to a counterparty by way of a loan that is secured by an enforceable security interest granted by that counterparty to the NCB in the form of e.g. a pledge, assignment or charge granted over assets;
‘collection of fixed-term deposits’ means an instrument used in conducting open market operations, whereby the Eurosystem invites counterparties to place fixed-term deposits on accounts with their home NCBs in order to absorb liquidity from the market;
‘competent authority’ means a public authority or body officially recognised by national law that is empowered by national law to supervise institutions as part of the supervisory system in the relevant Member State, including the ECB with regard to the tasks conferred on it by Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 ( 2 );
‘counterparty’ means an institution fulfilling the eligibility criteria laid down in Part Three entitling it to access the Eurosystem's monetary policy operations;
‘covered bond’ means a debt instrument that is dual recourse: (a) directly or indirectly to a credit institution; and (b) to a dynamic cover pool of underlying assets, and for which there is no tranching of risk;
‘credit claim’ means a claim for the repayment of money, which constitutes a debt obligation of a debtor vis-à-vis a counterparty. Credit claims also include Schuldscheindarlehen and Dutch-registered private claims on the government or other eligible debtors that are covered by a government guarantee, e.g. housing associations;
‘credit institution’ means a credit institution within the meaning of Article 2(5) of Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 3 ) and point (1) of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 4 ), which is subject to supervision by a competent authority; or a publicly-owned credit institution within the meaning of Article 123(2) of the Treaty that is subject to supervision of a standard comparable to supervision by a competent authority;
‘credit rating’ has the same meaning as in Article 3(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 5 );
‘cross-border use’ means the submission, as collateral, by a counterparty to its home NCB of:
marketable assets held in another Member State whose currency is the euro;
marketable assets issued in another Member State and held in the Member State of the home NCB;
credit claims where the credit claim agreement is governed by the laws of another Member State whose currency is the euro other than that of the home NCB;
retail mortgage-backed debt instruments (RMBDs) in accordance with the applicable procedures of the CCBM;
non-marketable debt instruments backed by eligible credit claims (DECCs) issued and held in another Member State whose currency is the euro other than that of the home NCB;
‘currency hedge’ means an agreement entered into between a securities issuer and a hedge counterparty, pursuant to which a portion of the currency risk arising from the receipt of cash flows in a non-euro currency is mitigated by swapping the cash flows for euro currency payments to be made by the hedge counterparty, including any guarantee by the hedge counterparty of those payments;
‘custodian’ means an entity which undertakes the safekeeping and administration of securities and other financial assets on behalf of others;
‘default market value’ means, with regard to any assets on any date:
the market value of such assets at the default valuation time calculated on the basis of the most representative price on the business day preceding the valuation date;
in the absence of a representative price for a particular asset on the business day preceding the valuation date, the last trading price is used. If no trading price is available, the NCB undertaking the operation will define a price, taking into account the last price identified for the asset in the reference market;
in the case of assets for which no market value exists, any other reasonable method of valuation;
if the NCB has sold the assets or equivalent assets at the market price before the default valuation time, the net proceeds of sale, after deducting all reasonable costs, fees and expenses incurred in connection with such sale, such calculation being made and amounts determined by the NCB;
‘delivery-versus-payment’ or ‘delivery-against-payment system’ means a mechanism in an exchange-for-value settlement system which ensures that the final transfer, i.e. the delivery, of assets occurs only upon the occurrence of a corresponding final transfer of other assets, i.e. the payment;
‘deposit facility’ means a standing facility offered by the Eurosystem which counterparties may use to make overnight deposits at the Eurosystem through an NCB, which are remunerated at a pre-specified interest rate;
‘deposit facility rate’ means the interest rate applied to the deposit facility;
‘direct link’ means an arrangement between two SSSs operated by CSDs, whereby one CSD becomes a direct participant in the SSS operated by the other CSD by opening a securities account, in order to allow the transfer of securities through a book-entry process;
‘domestic use’ means the submission, as collateral, by a counterparty established in a Member State whose currency is the euro, of:
marketable assets issued and held in the same Member State as that of its home NCB;
credit claims where the credit claim agreement is governed by the laws of the Member State of its home NCB;
RMBDs issued by entities established in the Member State of its home NCB;
non-marketable debt instruments backed by eligible credit claims issued and held in the same Member State as that of its home NCB;
‘earmarking system’ means a system for NCBs' collateral management whereby liquidity is provided against specified, identifiable assets earmarked as collateral for specified Eurosystem credit operations. The substitution of these assets with other specific eligible assets may be permitted by the home NCB provided that they are earmarked as collateral and are adequate for the specific operation;
‘EEA legislative covered bond’ means a covered bond which is issued in accordance with the requirements under Article 52(4) of Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 6 );
‘eligible assets’ means assets that fulfil the criteria laid down in Part Four and are accordingly eligible as collateral for Eurosystem credit operations;
‘eligible link’ means a direct or relayed link that the Eurosystem has assessed as compliant with the eligibility criteria laid down in Annex VIa for use in Eurosystem credit operations and is published on the Eurosystem list of eligible links on the ECB's website. An eligible relayed link is composed of underlying eligible direct links;
‘eligible SSS’ means an SSS operated by a CSD that the Eurosystem has assessed as compliant with the eligibility criteria laid down in Annex VIa for use in Eurosystem credit operations and is published on the Eurosystem list of eligible SSSs on the ECB's website;
‘end-of-day’ means the time of the business day following closure of TARGET2 at which the payments processed in TARGET2 are finalised for the day;
‘ESMA reporting activation date’ means the first day on which both (a) a securitisation repository has been registered by the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and therefore becomes an ESMA securitisation repository and (b) the relevant implementing technical standards, in the format of the standardised templates, have been adopted by the Commission under Article 7(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 7 ) and have become applicable;
‘ESMA securitisation repository’ means a securitisation repository within the meaning of point (23) of Article 2 of Regulation (EU) 2017/2402, which is registered with ESMA pursuant to Article 10 of that Regulation;
‘euro area inflation index’ means an index provided by Eurostat or a national statistical authority of a Member State whose currency is the euro, e.g. the Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices (HICP);
‘European Economic Area’ (EEA) means all Member States, regardless of whether or not they have formally acceded to the EEA, together with Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway;
‘Eurosystem’ means the ECB and the NCBs;
‘Eurosystem business day’ means any day on which the ECB and at least one NCB are open for the purpose of conducting Eurosystem monetary policy operations;
‘Eurosystem credit operations’ means: (a) liquidity-providing reverse transactions, i.e. liquidity-providing Eurosystem monetary policy operations excluding foreign exchange swaps for monetary policy purposes and outright purchases; and (b) intraday credit;
‘Eurosystem designated repository’ means an entity designated by the Eurosystem in accordance with Annex VIII and which continues to fulfil the requirements for designation set out in that Annex;
‘Eurosystem monetary policy operations’ means open market operations and standing facilities;
▼M6 —————
‘final transfer’ means an irrevocable and unconditional transfer which effects the discharge of the obligation to make the transfer;
‘financial corporation’ means a financial corporation as defined in Annex A to Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 8 );
‘fine-tuning operations’ means a category of open market operations executed by the Eurosystem, particularly to deal with liquidity fluctuations in the market;
‘fixed coupons’ means debt instruments with a predetermined periodic interest payment;
‘fixed-rate tender procedure’ means a tender procedure whereby the ECB specifies the interest rate, price, swap point or spread in advance of the tender procedure and participating counterparties bid the amount they want to transact at that fixed interest rate, price, swap point or spread;
‘floating coupon’ means a coupon linked to a reference interest rate with a resetting period corresponding to this coupon of no longer than one year;
‘foreign exchange swap for monetary policy purposes’ is an instrument used in conducting open market operations whereby the Eurosystem buys or sells euro spot against a foreign currency and, at the same time, sells or buys it back in a forward transaction on a specified repurchase date;
‘home NCB’ means the NCB of the Member State whose currency is the euro in which the counterparty is established;
‘indicative calendar for the Eurosystem's regular tender operations’ means a calendar prepared by the Eurosystem, as endorsed by the ECB's Governing Council, which indicates the timing of the reserve maintenance period, as well as the announcement, allotment and maturity of main refinancing operations and regular longer-term refinancing operations;
‘in-kind recapitalisation with public debt instruments’ means any form of increase in the subscribed capital of a credit institution where all or part of the consideration is provided through a direct placement with the credit institution of sovereign or public sector debt instruments that have been issued by the sovereign state or public sector entity providing the new capital to the credit institution;
‘international central securities depository’ (ICSD) means a CSD that is active in the settlement of internationally traded securities from various national markets, typically across currency areas;
‘international organisation’ means an entity listed in Article 118 of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, whereby exposures to such an entity are assigned a 0 % risk weight;
‘international securities identification number’ (ISIN) means the international identification code assigned to securities issued in financial markets;
‘intraday credit’ means intraday credit as defined in point (26) of Article 2 of Guideline ECB/2012/27 ( 9 );
‘investment firm’ means an investment firm within the meaning of point (2) of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013;
‘investment fund’ means money market funds (MMFs) or non-money market funds (non-MMFs) as defined in Annex A to Regulation (EU) No 549/2013;
‘issuance of ECB debt certificates’ means a monetary policy instrument used in conducting open market operations, whereby the ECB issues debt certificates which represent a debt obligation of the ECB in relation to the certificate holder;
‘jumbo covered bond’ means an EEA legislative covered bond with an issuing volume of at least EUR 1 billion, for which at least three market-makers provide regular bid and ask quotes;
‘leasing receivables’ means the scheduled and contractually mandated payments by the lessee to the lessor under the term of a lease agreement. Residual values are not leasing receivables. Personal Contract Purchase (PCP) agreements, i.e. agreements pursuant to which the obligor may exercise its option: (a) to make a final payment to acquire full legal title of the goods; or (b) to return the goods in settlement of the agreement; are assimilated to leasing agreements;
‘legislative covered bond’ means a covered bond which is either an EEA legislative covered bond or a non-EEA G10 legislative covered bond;
‘liquidity support’ means any structural, actual or potential feature that is designed or deemed appropriate to cover any temporary cash flow shortfall that may occur during the lifetime of an ABS transaction;
‘loan-level data repository’ means an ESMA securitisation repository or a Eurosystem designated repository;
‘longer-term refinancing operations’ (LTROs) means a category of open market operations that are executed by the Eurosystem in the form of reverse transactions that are aimed at providing liquidity with a maturity longer than that of the main refinancing operations to the financial sector;
‘main refinancing operations’ (MROs) means a category of regular open market operations that are executed by the Eurosystem in the form of reverse transactions;
‘maintenance period’ has the same meaning as defined in Regulation (EC) No 1745/2003 (ECB/2003/9);
‘margin call’ means a procedure relating to the application of variation margins, implying that if the value of the assets mobilised as collateral by a counterparty, as regularly measured, falls below a certain level, the Eurosystem requires the counterparty to supply additional eligible assets or cash. For pooling systems, a margin call is performed only in cases of under-collateralisation, and for earmarking systems symmetric margin calls are performed, each method as further specified in the national documentation of the home NCB;
‘marginal interest rate’ means the lowest interest rate in liquidity-providing variable rate tender procedures at which bids are fulfilled, or the highest interest rate in liquidity-absorbing variable rate tender procedures at which bids are fulfilled;
‘marginal lending facility’ means a standing facility offered by the Eurosystem which counterparties may use to receive overnight credit from the Eurosystem through an NCB at a pre-specified interest rate subject to a requirement for sufficient eligible assets as collateral;
‘marginal lending facility rate’ means the interest rate applied to the marginal lending facility;
‘marginal swap point quotation’ means the swap point quotation at which the total tender allotment is exhausted;
‘marketable assets’ means debt instruments that are admitted to trading on a market and that fulfil the eligibility criteria laid down in Part Four;
‘maturity date’ means the date on which a Eurosystem monetary policy operation expires. In the case of a repurchase agreement or swap, the maturity date corresponds to the repurchase date;
‘Member State’ means a Member State of the Union;
‘multi cédulas’ means debt instruments issued by specific Spanish SPVs (Fondo de Titulización de Activos, FTA) enabling a certain number of small-sized single cédulas (Spanish covered bonds) from several originators to be pooled together;
‘multilateral development bank’ means an entity listed in Article 117(2) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, whereby exposures to such an entity are assigned a 0 % risk weight;
‘multiple rate auction (American auction)’ means an auction in which the allotment interest rate or price or swap point equals the interest rate or price or swap point offered in each individual bid;
‘multi-step coupon’ means a coupon structure where the margin part (x) increases more than once during the life of the asset according to a predetermined schedule on predetermined dates, usually the call date or the coupon payment date;
‘national central bank’ (NCB) means a national central bank of a Member State whose currency is the euro;
‘NCB business day’ means any day on which an NCB is open for the purpose of conducting Eurosystem monetary policy operations, including days when branches of such an NCB may be closed due to local or regional bank holidays;
‘non-EEA G10 countries’ means the countries participating in the Group of Ten (G10) that are not EEA countries, i.e. the United States of America, Canada, Japan and Switzerland;
‘non-EEA G10 legislative covered bond’ means a covered bond issued in accordance with the requirements of the national covered bond legislative framework of a non-EEA G10 country;
‘non-financial corporation’ has the same meaning as in Regulation (EU) No 549/2013;
‘non-marketable asset’ means any of the following assets: fixed-term deposits, credit claims, RMBDs and non-marketable debt instruments backed by eligible credit claims;
‘Non-marketable debt instruments backed by eligible credit claims’ (hereinafter ‘DECCs’) means debt instruments:
that are backed, directly or indirectly, by credit claims that satisfy all Eurosystem eligibility criteria for credit claims in accordance with Section 1, Chapter 1 of Title III of Part Four, subject to the provisions of Article 107f;
that offer dual recourse to: (i) a credit institution that is the originator of the underlying credit claims; and (ii) the dynamic cover pool of underlying credit claims referred to in point (a);
for which there is no tranching of risk;
▼M9 —————
‘outright transaction’ means an instrument used in conducting open market operations, whereby the Eurosystem buys or sells eligible marketable assets outright in the market (spot or forward), resulting in a full transfer of ownership from the seller to the buyer with no connected reverse transfer of ownership;
‘pooling system’ means a system for NCBs' collateral management, whereby a counterparty maintains a pool account with an NCB to deposit assets collateralising that counterparty's related Eurosystem credit operations, whereby the assets are recorded in such a way that an individual eligible asset is not linked to a specific Eurosystem credit operation and the counterparty may substitute eligible assets on a continuous basis;
‘public credit rating’ means a credit rating which is: (a) issued or endorsed by a credit rating agency registered in the Union that is accepted as an external credit assessment institution by the Eurosystem; and (b) disclosed publicly or distributed by subscription;
‘public sector entity’ means an entity that is classified by a national statistical authority as a unit within the public sector for the purposes of Regulation (EU) No 549/2013;
‘quick tender’ means a tender procedure, which is normally executed within a time frame of 105 minutes from the announcement of the tender to the certification of the allotment result, and which can be restricted to a limited set of counterparties, as further specified in Part Two;
‘relayed link’ means a link established between SSSs operated by two different CSDs which exchange securities transactions or transfers through a third SSS operated by a CSD acting as an intermediary or, in the case of SSSs operated by CSDs participating in TARGET2-Securities, through several SSSs operated by CSDs acting as intermediaries;
‘repurchase agreement’ means an arrangement whereby an eligible asset is sold to a buyer without any retention of ownership on the part of the seller, while the seller simultaneously obtains the right and the obligation to repurchase an equivalent asset at a specific price on a future date or on demand;
‘repurchase date’ means the date on which the buyer is obliged to sell back equivalent assets to the seller in relation to a transaction under a repurchase agreement;
‘repurchase price’ means the price at which the buyer is obliged to sell back equivalent assets to the seller in relation to a transaction under a repurchase agreement. The repurchase price equals the sum of the purchase price and the price differential corresponding to the interest on the advanced liquidity over the maturity of the operation;
‘reverse transaction’ means an instrument used in conducting open market operations and when providing access to the marginal lending facility whereby an NCB buys or sells eligible assets under a repurchase agreement or conducts credit operations in the form of collateralised loans;
‘safe custody account’ means a securities account managed by an ICSD, CSD or NCB on which credit institutions can place securities eligible for Eurosystem credit operations;
‘securities settlement system’ (SSS) means a securities settlement system as defined in point (10) of Article 2(1) of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014, which allows the transfer of securities, either free of payment (FOP), or against payment (delivery versus payment (DVP));
‘settlement date’ means the date on which a transaction is settled;
‘single rate auction (Dutch auction)’ means an auction in which the allotment interest rate or price or swap point applied for all satisfied bids is equal to the marginal interest rate or price or swap point;
‘Special Purpose Vehicle’ (SPV) means a securitisation special purpose entity as defined in point 66 of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013;
‘standard tender’ means a tender procedure which is normally carried out within a time frame of 24 hours from the announcement of the tender to the certification of the allotment result;
‘structural operations’ means a category of open market operations executed by the Eurosystem to adjust the structural liquidity position of the Eurosystem vis-à-vis the financial sector or pursue other monetary policy purposes as further specified in Part Two;
▼M9 —————
‘sustainability performance target’ (SPT) means a target set by the issuer in a publicly available issuance document, measuring quantified improvements in the issuer’s sustainability profile over a predefined period of time with reference to one or more of the environmental objectives set out in Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 10 ) and/or to one or more of the Sustainable Development Goals set by the United Nations relating to climate change or environmental degradation ( 11 );
‘swap point’ means the difference between the exchange rate of the forward transaction and the exchange rate of the spot transaction in a foreign exchange swap, quoted according to general market conventions;
‘tap issuance’ or ‘tap issue’ means an issue forming a single series with an earlier issuance or issue;
‘TARGET2’ means the real-time gross settlement system for the euro, providing settlement of payments in euro in central bank money, regulated under Guideline ECB/2012/27;
‘tender procedure’ means a procedure whereby the Eurosystem provides liquidity to, or withdraws liquidity from, the market whereby the NCB enters into transactions by accepting bids submitted by counterparties after a public announcement;
‘trade date (T)’ means the date on which a trade, i.e. an agreement on a financial transaction between two counterparties, is struck. The trade date may coincide with the settlement date for the transaction (same-day settlement) or precede the settlement date by a specified number of business days (the settlement date is specified as T + the settlement lag);
▼M9 —————
‘tri-party agent’ (TPA) means a CSD operating an eligible SSS that has entered into a contract with an NCB whereby such CSD is to provide certain collateral management services as an agent of that NCB;
‘Union’ means the European Union;
‘valuation haircut’ means a percentage decrease applied to the market value of an asset mobilised as collateral in Eurosystem credit operations;
‘valuation markdown’ means a certain percentage decrease in the market value of assets, mobilised as collateral in Eurosystem credit operations, prior to the application of any valuation haircut;
‘variable rate tender procedure’ means a tender procedure whereby participating counterparties bid both the amount they want to transact and the interest rate, swap point or price at which they want to enter into transactions with the Eurosystem in competition with each other, and whereby the most competitive bids are satisfied first until the total amount offered is exhausted;
‘wind-down entity’ means an entity, whether privately or publicly owned, that (a) has as its main purpose the gradual divestment of its assets and the cessation of its business; or (b) is an asset management or divestment entity established to support financial sector restructuring and/or resolution, including asset management vehicles resulting from a resolution action in the form of the application of an asset separation tool pursuant to Article 26 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 12 ) or national legislation implementing Article 42 of Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 13 );
‘zero coupon’ means a debt instrument with no periodic coupon payments.
PART TWO
THE EUROSYSTEM MONETARY POLICY TOOLS, OPERATIONS, INSTRUMENTS AND PROCEDURES
Article 3
Eurosystem monetary policy implementation framework
The tools used by the Eurosystem in the implementation of monetary policy shall consist of:
open market operations;
standing facilities;
minimum reserve requirements.
Article 4
Indicative characteristics of the Eurosystem monetary policy operations
An overview of the characteristics of the Eurosystem monetary policy operations is set out in Table 1.
Table 1
Overview of characteristics of the Eurosystem monetary policy operations
Categories of the monetary policy operations |
Types of instruments |
Maturity |
Frequency |
Procedure |
||
Provision of liquidity |
Absorption of liquidity |
|||||
Open market operations |
Main refinancing operations |
Reverse transactions |
— |
One week |
Weekly |
Standard tender procedures |
Longer-term refinancing operations |
Reverse transactions |
— |
Three months (*1) |
Monthly (*1) |
Standard tender procedures |
|
Fine-tuning operations |
Reverse transactions |
Reverse transactions |
Non-standardised |
Non-standardised |
Tender procedures Bilateral procedures (*2) |
|
Foreign exchange swaps |
Foreign exchange swaps |
|||||
— |
Collection of fixed-term deposits |
|||||
Structural operations |
Reverse transactions |
Reverse transactions |
Non-standardised |
Non-standardised |
Standard tender procedures (*3) |
|
— |
Issuance of ECB debt certificates |
Less than 12 months |
||||
Outright purchases |
Outright sales |
— |
Bilateral procedures Tender procedures (*4) |
|||
Standing facilities |
Marginal lending facility |
Reverse transactions |
— |
Overnight |
Access at the discretion of counterparties |
|
Deposit facility |
— |
Deposits |
Overnight |
Access at the discretion of counterparties |
||
(*1)
Pursuant to Article 7(2)(b), Article 7(2)(c), Article 7(3) and Article 7(4).
(*2)
Pursuant to Article 8(2)(c), Article 10(4)(c), Article 11(5)(c) and Article 12(6)(c).
(*3)
Pursuant to Article 9(2)(c), Article 10(4)(c) and Article 13(5)(d).
(*4)
Pursuant to Article 9(2)(c) and Article 14(3)(c). |
TITLE I
OPEN MARKET OPERATIONS
CHAPTER 1
Overview of open market operations
Article 5
Overview of categories and instruments in respect of open market operations
Depending on their specific purpose, open market operations can be grouped under the following categories:
main refinancing operations;
longer-term refinancing operations;
fine-tuning operations;
structural operations.
Open market operations shall be conducted by means of the following instruments:
reverse transactions;
foreign exchange swaps for monetary policy purposes;
the collection of fixed-term deposits;
the issuance of ECB debt certificates;
outright transactions.
As regards the specific categories of open market operations laid down in paragraph 2, the following instruments referred to in paragraph 3 shall be applicable:
MROs and LTROs are conducted exclusively by means of reverse transactions;
fine-tuning operations may be conducted by means of:
reverse transactions;
foreign exchange swaps for monetary policy purposes;
the collection of fixed-term deposits;
structural operations may be conducted by means of:
reverse transactions;
the issuance of ECB debt certificates;
outright transactions.
CHAPTER 2
Categories of open market operations
Article 6
Main refinancing operations
As regards their operational features, MROs:
are liquidity-providing operations;
are normally conducted each week in accordance with the indicative calendar for the Eurosystem's regular tender operations;
normally have a maturity of one week, as indicated in the indicative calendar for the Eurosystem's regular tender operations, subject to the exception laid down in paragraph 3;
are executed in a decentralised manner by the NCBs;
are executed by means of standard tender procedures;
are subject to the eligibility criteria laid down in Part Three, which must be fulfilled by all counterparties submitting bids for such operations;
are based on eligible assets as collateral.
Article 7
Longer-term refinancing operations
As regards their operational features, LTROs:
are liquidity-providing reverse operations;
are conducted regularly each month in accordance with the indicative calendar for the Eurosystem's regular tender operations, subject to the exception laid down in paragraph 4;
normally have a maturity of three months in accordance with the indicative calendar for the Eurosystem's regular tender operations, subject to the exceptions laid down in paragraphs 3 and 4;
are executed in a decentralised manner by the NCBs;
are executed by means of standard tender procedures;
are subject to the eligibility criteria as laid down in Part Three, which must be fulfilled by all counterparties submitting bids for such operations;
are based on eligible assets as collateral.
Article 8
Fine-tuning operations
As regards their operational features, fine-tuning operations:
may be conducted either as a liquidity-providing or as a liquidity-absorbing operation;
have a frequency and maturity that are normally not standardised;
are normally executed by means of quick tender procedures, unless the Eurosystem decides to conduct the specific fine-tuning operation by other means (standard tender procedure or bilateral procedure) in the light of specific monetary policy considerations or in order to react to market conditions;
are executed in a decentralised manner by the NCBs, without prejudice to Article 45(3);
are subject to the eligibility criteria for counterparties as laid down in Part Three, depending on:
the specific type of instrument for conducting fine-tuning operations; and
the applicable procedure for that specific type of instrument;
when conducted by means of reverse transactions, they are based on eligible assets as collateral.
Article 9
Structural operations
As regards their operational features, structural operations:
are liquidity-providing or liquidity-absorbing operations;
have a frequency and maturity that is not standardised;
are executed by means of tender or bilateral procedures, depending on the specific type of instrument for conducting the structural operation;
are executed in a decentralised manner by the NCBs;
are subject to the eligibility criteria for counterparties as laid down in Part Three, depending on: (i) the specific type of instrument for conducting structural operations; and (ii) the applicable procedure for that specific type of instrument;
liquidity-providing structural operations are based on eligible assets as collateral, with the exception of outright purchases.
CHAPTER 3
Instruments for open market operations
Article 10
Reverse transactions
As regards their operational features, reverse transactions for monetary policy purposes:
may be conducted either as liquidity-providing or liquidity-absorbing operations;
have a frequency and maturity that depends on the category of open market operation for which they are used;
that fall into the category open market operations are executed by means of standard tender procedures, with the exception of fine-tuning operations, where they are executed by means of tender or bilateral procedures;
that fall into the category marginal lending facility are executed as described in Article 18;
are executed in a decentralised manner by the NCBs, without prejudice to Article 45(3).
Article 11
Foreign exchange swaps for monetary policy purposes
As regards their operational features, foreign exchange swaps for monetary policy purposes:
may be conducted either as liquidity-providing or as liquidity-absorbing operations;
have a frequency and maturity that is not standardised;
are executed by means of quick tender procedures or bilateral procedures, unless the Eurosystem decides to conduct the specific operation by other means (standard tender procedure), in the light of specific monetary policy considerations or in order to react to market conditions;
are executed in a decentralised manner by the NCBs, without prejudice to Article 45(3).
Counterparties participating in foreign exchange swaps for monetary policy purposes shall be subject to the eligibility criteria as laid down in Part Three, depending on the applicable procedure for the relevant operation.
Table 2
The exchange rate terms of foreign exchange swaps for monetary policy purposes
S |
= |
spot (on the transaction date of the foreign exchange swap) of the exchange rate between the euro (EUR) and a foreign currency ABC
|
FM |
= |
forward exchange rate between the euro and a foreign currency ABC on the repurchase date of the swap (M)
|
ΔΜ |
= |
forward points between the euro and ABC at the repurchase date of the swap (M)
|
N(.) |
= |
spot amount of currency; N(.)M is the forward amount of currency: or
or
|
Article 12
Collection of fixed-term deposits
As regards their operational features, the collection of fixed-term deposits:
is conducted in order to absorb liquidity;
may be conducted on the basis of a pre-announced schedule of operations with pre-defined frequency and maturity or may be conducted ad hoc to react to liquidity condition developments, e.g. the collection of fixed-term deposits may be conducted on the last day of a reserve maintenance period to counter liquidity imbalances which may have accumulated since the allotment of the last main refinancing operation;
is executed by means of quick tender procedures, unless it is decided by the ECB to conduct the specific operation by other means (bilateral procedure or standard tender procedure), in the light of specific monetary policy considerations or in order to react to market conditions;
is executed in a decentralised manner by the NCBs, without prejudice to Article 45(3).
Article 13
Issuance of ECB debt certificates
The ECB may issue ECB debt certificates at:
a discounted issue amount that is below the nominal amount; or
an amount above the nominal amount,
which are to be redeemed at maturity at a nominal amount.
The difference between the issue and the nominal (redemption) amount shall equal the interest accrued on the issue amount, at the agreed interest rate, over the maturity of the certificate. The interest rate applied shall be a simple interest rate based on the actual/360 day-count convention. The calculation of the issue amount shall be made in accordance with Table 3.
Table 3
Issuance of ECB debt certificates
The issue amount is:
where:
N |
= |
nominal amount of the ECB debt certificate |
rI |
= |
interest rate (in %) |
D |
= |
maturity of the ECB debt certificate (in days) |
PT |
= |
issue amount of the ECB debt certificate |
As regards the operational features of ECB debt certificates:
they are issued as a liquidity-absorbing open market operation;
they may be issued on a regular or a non-regular basis;
they have a maturity that is less than 12 months;
they are issued by means of standard tender procedures;
they are tendered and settled in a decentralised manner by the NCBs.
Article 14
Outright transactions
As regards their operational features, outright transactions:
may be conducted as liquidity-providing operations (outright purchases) or liquidity-absorbing operations (outright sales);
have a frequency that is not standardised;
are executed by means of bilateral procedures, unless the ECB decides to conduct the specific operation by quick or standard tender procedures;
are executed in a decentralised manner by the NCBs, without prejudice to Article 45(3);
are based only on eligible marketable assets as specified in Part Four.
Article 15
Obligations of collateralisation and settlement in reverse transactions and foreign exchange swaps for monetary policy purposes
With regard to liquidity-providing reverse transactions and liquidity-providing foreign exchange swaps for monetary policy purposes, counterparties shall:
transfer a sufficient amount of eligible assets in the case of reverse transactions or the corresponding foreign currency amount in the case of foreign exchange swaps to settle on the settlement day;
ensure adequate collateralisation of the operation until its maturity; the value of the assets mobilised as collateral shall cover at all times the total outstanding amount of the liquidity-providing operation including the accrued interest during the term of the operation. If interest accrues at a positive rate, the applicable amount should be added on a daily basis to the total outstanding amount of the liquidity-providing operation and if it accrues at a negative rate, the applicable amount should be subtracted on a daily basis from the total outstanding amount of the liquidity-providing operation;
when applicable as regards point (b), provide adequate collateralisation by way of corresponding margin calls by means of sufficient eligible assets or cash.
With regard to liquidity-absorbing reverse transactions and liquidity-absorbing foreign exchange swaps for monetary policy purposes, counterparties shall:
transfer a sufficient amount of cash to settle the amounts they have been allotted in the relevant liquidity absorbing operation;
ensure adequate collateralisation of the operation until its maturity;
when applicable as regards point (b), provide adequate collateralisation by way of corresponding margin calls by means of sufficient eligible assets or cash.
Article 16
Obligations for settlement for outright purchases and sales, the collection of fixed-term deposits and the issuance of ECB debt certificates
TITLE II
STANDING FACILITIES
Article 17
Standing facilities
Standing facilities shall consist of the following categories:
the marginal lending facility;
the deposit facility.
CHAPTER 1
Marginal lending facility
Article 18
Characteristics of the marginal lending facility
Article 19
Access conditions for the marginal lending facility
Article 20
Maturity and interest rate of the marginal lending facility
CHAPTER 2
Deposit facility
Article 21
Characteristics of the deposit facility
Article 22
Access conditions to the deposit facility
Article 23
Maturity and interest rate of the deposit facility
TITLE III
PROCEDURES FOR EUROSYSTEM MONETARY POLICY OPERATIONS
CHAPTER 1
Tender and bilateral procedures for Eurosystem open market operations
Article 24
Types of procedures for open market operations
Open market operations shall be executed through tender procedures or bilateral procedures.
Article 25
Overview of tender procedures
Tender procedures shall be performed in six operational steps, as specified in Table 4.
Table 4
Operational steps for tender procedures
Step 1 |
Tender announcement (a) ECB public announcement (b) NCBs' public announcement and direct announcement to individual counterparties (if deemed necessary) |
Step 2 |
Counterparties' preparation and submission of bids |
Step 3 |
Compilation of bids by the Eurosystem |
Step 4 |
Tender allotment and announcement of tender results (a) ECB tender allotment decision (b) ECB public announcement of the allotment results |
Step 5 |
Certification of individual allotment results |
Step 6 |
Settlement of the transactions |
Tender procedures shall be conducted in the form of standard tender procedures or quick tender procedures. The operational features of standard and quick tender procedures are identical, except for the time frame (Tables 5 and 6) and the range of counterparties.
Table 5
Indicative time frame for the operational steps in standard tender procedures (times are stated in Central European Time (1))
(1) Central European Time (CET) takes account of the change to Central European Summer Time.
Table 6
Indicative time frame for the operational steps in quick tender procedures (times are stated in CET (1))
(1) Central European Time (CET) takes account of the change to Central European Summer Time.
Article 26
Standard tender procedures
Article 27
Quick tender procedures
Article 28
Execution of standard tender procedures for MROs and regular LTROs, based on the tender calendar
The indicative trade days for MROs and regular LTROs are specified in Table 7.
Table 7
Normal trade days for MROs and regular LTROs
Category of open market operations |
Normal trade day (T) |
MROs |
Each Tuesday (*1) |
Regular LTROs |
The last Wednesday of each calendar month (*2) |
(*1)
Special scheduling can take place due to holidays.
(*2)
Due to the holiday period, the December operation is normally brought forward by one week, i.e. to the preceding Wednesday of the month. |
Article 29
Execution of tender procedures for fine-tuning and structural operations without a tender operation calendar
Article 30
Announcement of standard and quick tender procedures
Article 31
Form and place of submission of bids
Article 32
Submission of bids
Article 33
Minimum and maximum bid amounts
Article 34
Minimum and maximum bid rate
Article 35
Deadline for submission of bids
Article 36
Rejection of bids
An NCB shall reject:
all of a counterparty's bids, if the aggregate amount bid exceeds any maximum bid limit established by the ECB;
any bid of a counterparty, if the bid is below the minimum bid amount;
any bid of a counterparty, if the bid is below the minimum accepted interest rate, price, or swap point or above the maximum accepted interest rate, price or swap point.
Article 37
Allotment in liquidity-providing and liquidity-absorbing fixed-rate tender procedures
In a fixed-rate tender procedure, the bids of counterparties shall be allotted in the following manner:
The bids shall be added together.
If the aggregate amount bid exceeds the total amount of liquidity to be allotted, the submitted bids shall be satisfied pro rata, based on the ratio of the amount to be allotted to the aggregate amount bid, in accordance with Table 1 of Annex III.
The amount allotted to each counterparty shall be rounded to the nearest euro.
The ECB may decide to allot:
a minimum allotment amount, which is a lower limit on the amount that may be allotted to each bidder; or
a minimum allotment ratio, which is a lower limit, expressed in percentage terms, on the ratio of bids at the marginal interest rate that may be allotted to each bidder.
Article 38
Allotment in liquidity-providing variable rate tender procedures in euro
In a liquidity-providing variable rate tender procedure in euro, the bids of counterparties shall be allotted in the following manner:
Bids shall be listed in descending order of offered interest rates or ascending order of offered prices.
Bids with the highest interest rate (lowest price) levels shall be satisfied first and subsequently bids with successively lower interest rates (higher price) shall be accepted, until the total liquidity to be allotted is exhausted.
If at the marginal interest rate (highest accepted price), the aggregate amount bid exceeds the remaining amount to be allotted, the remaining amount shall be allocated pro rata among the bids based on the ratio of the remaining amount to be allotted to the total amount bid at the marginal interest rate (highest accepted price), in accordance with Table 2 of Annex III.
The amount allotted to each counterparty shall be rounded to the nearest euro.
Article 39
Allotment in liquidity-absorbing variable rate tender procedures in euro
In a liquidity-absorbing variable rate tender procedure in euro, used for the issuance of ECB debt certificates and the collection of fixed term deposits, the bids of counterparties shall be allotted in the following manner:
Bids shall be listed in ascending order of offered interest rates or descending order of offered prices.
Bids with the lowest interest rate (highest price) levels shall be satisfied first and subsequently bids with successively higher interest rates (lower price bids) shall be accepted until the total liquidity to be absorbed is exhausted.
If at the marginal interest rate (lowest accepted price), the aggregate bid amount exceeds the remaining amount to be allotted, the remaining amount shall be allocated pro rata among the bids, based on the ratio of the remaining amount to be allotted to the total bid amount at the marginal interest rate (lowest accepted price), in accordance with Table 2 of Annex III.
The amount allotted to each counterparty shall be rounded to the nearest euro. With regard to the issuance of ECB debt certificates, the allotted nominal amount shall be rounded to the nearest multiple of EUR 100 000 .
Article 40
Allotment in liquidity-providing variable rate foreign exchange swap tender procedures
In a liquidity-providing variable rate foreign exchange swap tender procedure, the bids of counterparties shall be allotted in the following manner:
Bids shall be listed in ascending order of swap point quotations by taking into account the sign of the quotation.
The sign of quotation depends on the sign of the interest rate differential between the foreign currency and the euro. For the maturity of the swap:
if the foreign currency interest rate is higher than the corresponding interest rate for the euro, the swap point quotation is positive, i.e. the euro is quoted at a premium to the foreign currency; and
if the foreign currency interest rate is lower than the corresponding interest rate for the euro, the swap point quotation is negative, i.e. the euro is quoted at a discount to the foreign currency.
The bids with the lowest swap point quotations shall be satisfied first and subsequently successively higher swap point quotations shall be accepted until the total amount of the fixed currency to be allotted is exhausted.
If, at the highest swap point quotation accepted, i.e. the marginal swap point quotation, the aggregate amount bid exceeds the remaining amount to be allotted, the remaining amount shall be allocated pro rata among the bids, based on the ratio of the remaining amount to be allotted to the total amount bid at the marginal swap point quotation, in accordance with Table 3 of Annex III.
The amount allotted to each counterparty shall be rounded to the nearest euro.
Article 41
Allotment in liquidity-absorbing variable rate foreign exchange swap tender procedures
In a liquidity-absorbing variable rate foreign exchange swap tender procedure, the bids of counterparties shall be allotted in the following manner:
Bids shall be listed in descending order of offered swap point quotations by taking into account the sign of the quotation.
The sign of the quotation depends on the sign of the interest rate differential between the foreign currency and the euro. For the maturity of the swap:
if the foreign currency interest rate is higher than the corresponding interest rate for the euro, the swap point quotation is positive, i.e. the euro is quoted at a premium to the foreign currency; and
if the foreign currency interest rate is lower than the corresponding interest rate for the euro, the swap point quotation is negative, i.e. the euro is quoted at a discount to the foreign currency.
Bids with the highest swap point quotations shall be satisfied first and subsequently successively lower swap point quotations shall be accepted until:
the total amount of the fixed currency to be absorbed is exhausted; and
at the lowest swap point quotation accepted, i.e. the marginal swap point quotation, the aggregate amount bid exceeds the remaining amount to be allotted.
The remaining amount shall be allocated pro rata among the bids, based on the ratio of the remaining amount to be allotted to the total amount bid at the marginal swap point quotation, in accordance with Table 3 of Annex III. The amount allotted to each counterparty shall be rounded to the nearest euro.
Article 42
Type of auction for variable rate tender procedures
For variable rate tender procedures, the Eurosystem may apply either a single rate auction (Dutch auction) or multiple rate auction (American auction).
Article 43
Announcement of tender results
Article 44
Overview of bilateral procedures
The Eurosystem may execute any of the following open market operations by means of bilateral procedures:
fine-tuning operations (reverse transactions, foreign exchange swaps or the collection of fixed-term deposits); or
structural operations (outright transactions).
Article 45
Bilateral procedures executed by means of direct contact with counterparties
Article 46
Bilateral procedures executed by means of stock exchanges and market agents
Article 47
Announcement of operations executed by means of bilateral procedures
Article 48
Operating days for bilateral procedures
CHAPTER 2
Settlement procedures for Eurosystem monetary policy operations
Article 49
Overview of settlement procedures
Payment orders relating to the participation in open market liquidity-providing operations or use of the marginal lending facility shall only be settled at the moment of or after the final transfer of the eligible assets as collateral to the operation. For this purpose, counterparties shall:
pre-deposit the eligible assets at an NCB; or
settle the eligible assets with an NCB on a delivery-versus-payment basis.
Article 50
Settlement of open market operations
The indicative settlement dates are summarised in Table 8.
Table 8
Indicative settlement dates for Eurosystem open market operations (*1)
Monetary policy instrument |
Settlement date for open market operations based on standard tender procedures |
Settlement date for open market operations based on quick tender procedures or bilateral procedures |
Reverse transactions |
T + 1 |
T |
Outright transactions |
According to market convention for the eligible assets |
|
Issuance of ECB debt certificates |
T + 2 |
— |
Foreign exchange swaps |
T, T + 1 or T + 2 |
|
Collection of fixed-term deposits |
T |
|
(*1)
The settlement date refers to Eurosystem business days. T refers to the trade day. |
Article 51
Settlement of open market operations executed by means of standard tender procedures
Article 52
Settlement of open market operations conducted by means of quick tender procedures or bilateral procedures
Article 53
Further provisions relating to settlement and end-of-day procedures
Article 54
Reserve holdings and excess reserves
Reserve holdings that exceed the minimum reserves referred to in paragraph 2 shall be remunerated in accordance with Decision (EU) 2019/1743 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2019/31) ( 14 ).
PART THREE
ELIGIBLE COUNTERPARTIES
Article 55
Eligibility criteria for participation in Eurosystem monetary policy operations
With regard to Eurosystem monetary policy operations, subject to Article 57, the Eurosystem shall only allow participation by institutions that fulfil the following criteria:
they shall be subject to the Eurosystem's minimum reserve system pursuant to Article 19.1 of the Statute of the ESCB and shall not have been granted an exemption from their obligations under the Eurosystem's minimum reserve system pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 2531/98 and Regulation (EC) No 1745/2003 (ECB/2003/9);
they shall be one of the following:
subject to at least one form of harmonised Union/EEA supervision by competent authorities in accordance with Directive 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 575/2013;
publicly owned credit institutions, within the meaning of Article 123(2) of the Treaty, subject to supervision of a standard comparable to supervision by competent authorities under Directive 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 575/2013;
institutions subject to non-harmonised supervision by competent authorities of a standard comparable to harmonised Union/EEA supervision by competent authorities under Directive 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, e.g. branches established in Member States whose currency is the euro of institutions incorporated outside the EEA. For the purpose of assessing an institution's eligibility to participate in Eurosystem monetary policy operations, as a rule, non-harmonised supervision shall be considered to be of a standard comparable to harmonised Union/EEA supervision by competent authorities under Directive 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, if the relevant Basel III standards adopted by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision are considered to have been implemented in the supervisory regime of a given jurisdiction;
they must be financially sound within the meaning of Article 55a;
they shall fulfil all operational requirements specified in the contractual or regulatory arrangements applied by the home NCB or ECB with respect to the specific instrument or operation.
Article 55a
Assessment of the financial soundness of institutions
In its assessment of the financial soundness of individual institutions for the purposes of this Article, the Eurosystem may take into account the following prudential information:
quarterly information on capital, leverage and liquidity ratios reported under Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 on an individual and consolidated basis, in accordance with the supervisory requirements; or
where applicable, prudential information of a standard comparable to information under point (a).
Article 56
Access to open market operations executed by means of standard tender procedures and to standing facilities
Institutions fulfilling the eligibility criteria under Article 55 shall have access to any of the following Eurosystem monetary policy operations:
standing facilities;
open market operations executed by means of standard tender procedures.
Article 57
Selection of counterparties for access to open market operations executed by means of quick tender procedures or bilateral procedures
For fine-tuning operations that are executed by means of quick tender procedures or bilateral procedures, counterparties shall be selected as follows:
For fine-tuning operations that are conducted by means of foreign exchange swaps for monetary policy purposes and executed by means of quick tender or bilateral procedures, the range of counterparties shall be identical to the range of entities that are selected for Eurosystem foreign exchange intervention operations and are established in the Member States whose currency is the euro. Counterparties for foreign exchange swaps for monetary policy purposes by means of quick tender or bilateral procedures do not need to fulfil the criteria laid down in Article 55. The selection criteria for counterparties participating in Eurosystem foreign exchange intervention operations are based on the principles of prudence and efficiency, as laid down in Annex V. The NCBs may apply limit-based systems in order to control credit exposures vis-à-vis individual counterparties participating in foreign exchange swaps for monetary policy purposes.
For fine-tuning operations conducted by means of reverse transactions or through the collection of fixed-term deposits and executed by means of quick tender procedures or bilateral procedures, each NCB shall select, for a specific transaction, a set of counterparties from among the institutions that fulfil the eligibility criteria laid down in Article 55 and are established in its Member State whose currency is the euro. The selection shall be primarily based on the relevant institution's activity in the money market. Additional selection criteria may be applied by the NCB, such as the efficiency of the trading desk and the bidding potential.
PART FOUR
ELIGIBLE ASSETS
TITLE I
GENERAL PRINCIPLES
Article 58
Eligible assets and accepted collateralisation techniques to be used for Eurosystem credit operations
Counterparties shall provide eligible assets by:
the transfer of ownership, which takes the legal form of a repurchase agreement; or
the creation of a security interest, i.e. a pledge, assignment or a charge granted over the relevant assets, which takes the legal form of a collateralised loan,
in either case pursuant to the national contractual or regulatory arrangements established and documented by the home NCB.
Article 59
General aspects of the Eurosystem credit assessment framework for eligible assets
For the purposes of the ECAF, the Eurosystem shall define credit quality requirements in the form of credit quality steps by establishing threshold values for the probability of default (PD) over a one-year horizon, as follows.
The Eurosystem considers, subject to regular review, a maximum probability of default over a one-year horizon of 0,10 % as equivalent to the credit quality requirement of credit quality step 2 and a maximum probability of default over a one-year horizon of 0,40 % as equivalent to the credit quality requirement of credit quality step 3.
All eligible assets for Eurosystem credit operations shall comply, as a minimum, with a credit quality requirement corresponding to credit quality step 3. Additional credit quality requirements for specific assets shall be applied by the Eurosystem in accordance with Titles II and III of Part Four.
TITLE II
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND CREDIT QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR MARKETABLE ASSETS
CHAPTER 1
Eligibility criteria for marketable assets
Article 60
Eligibility criteria relating to all types of marketable assets
In order to be eligible as collateral for Eurosystem credit operations, marketable assets shall be debt instruments fulfilling the eligibility criteria laid down in Section 1, except in the case of certain specific types of marketable assets, as laid down in Section 2.
Article 61
List of eligible marketable assets and reporting rules
Article 62
Principal amount of marketable assets
In order to be eligible, until their final redemption, debt instruments shall have:
a fixed and unconditional principal amount; or
an unconditional principal amount that is linked, on a flat basis, to only one euro area inflation index at a single point in time, containing no other complex structures.
Article 63
Acceptable coupon structures for marketable assets
►M9 In order to be eligible, debt instruments shall have one of the following coupon structures until final redemption: ◄
fixed, zero or multi-step coupons with a pre-defined coupon schedule and pre-defined coupon values;
floating coupons that have the following structure: coupon rate = (reference rate * l) ± x, with f ≤ coupon rate ≤ c, where:
the reference rate is only one of the following at a single point in time:
f (floor), c (ceiling), l (leveraging/deleveraging factor) and x (margin) are, if present, numbers that are either pre-defined at issuance, or may change over time only according to a path predefined at issuance, where l is greater than zero throughout the entire lifetime of the asset. For floating coupons with an inflation index reference rate, l shall be equal to one; or
multi-step or floating coupons with steps linked to SPTs, provided the issuer’s compliance with SPTs is subject to verification by an independent third party in accordance with the terms and conditions of the debt instrument.
Article 64
Non-subordination with respect to marketable assets
Eligible debt instruments shall not give rise to rights to the principal and/or the interest that are subordinated to the rights of holders of other debt instruments of the same issuer.
Article 64a
Marketable assets other than ABSs and covered bonds
Article 65
Currency of denomination of marketable assets
In order to be eligible, debt instruments shall be denominated in euro or in one of the former currencies of the Member States whose currency is the euro.
Article 66
Place of issue of marketable assets
International debt instruments issued through the ICSDs shall comply with the following criteria, as applicable.
International debt instruments issued in global bearer form shall be issued in the form of new global notes (NGNs) and shall be deposited with a common safekeeper which is an ICSD or a CSD that operates an eligible SSS. This requirement shall not apply to international debt instruments issued in global bearer form issued in the form of classical global notes prior to 1 January 2007 and fungible tap issuances of such notes issued under the same ISIN irrespective of the date of the tap-issuance.
International debt instruments issued in global registered form shall be issued under the new safekeeping structure for international debt instruments. By way of derogation, this shall not apply to international debt instruments issued in global registered form prior to 1 October 2010.
International debt instruments in individual note form shall not be eligible unless they were issued in individual note form prior to 1 October 2010.
Article 67
Settlement procedures for marketable assets
Article 68
Acceptable markets for marketable assets
The assessment of non-regulated markets by the Eurosystem shall be based on the following principles of safety, transparency and accessibility.
Safety refers to certainty with regard to transactions, in particular certainty in relation to the validity and enforceability of transactions.
Transparency refers to unimpeded access to information on the market's rules of procedure and operation, the financial features of the assets, the price formation mechanism, and the relevant prices and quantities, e.g. quotes, interest rates, trading volumes, outstanding amounts.
Accessibility refers to the ability of the Eurosystem to take part in and access the market. A market is considered accessible if its rules of procedure and operation allow the Eurosystem to obtain information and conduct transactions when needed for collateral management purposes.
Article 69
Type of issuer or guarantor for marketable assets
▼M7 —————
Article 70
Place of establishment of the issuer or guarantor
Article 71
Credit quality requirements for marketable assets
In order to be eligible, debt instruments shall meet the credit quality requirements specified in Chapter 2, except where otherwise stated.
Article 72
Eligibility criteria for asset-backed securities
In order to be eligible for Eurosystem credit operations, asset-backed securities shall comply with the general eligibility criteria relating to all types of marketable assets laid down in Section 1, with the exception of the requirements laid down in Article 62 relating to the principal amount, and in addition, the specific eligibility criteria laid down in this subsection.
Article 73
Homogeneity and composition of the cash-flow generating assets
In order for ABSs to be eligible, all cash-flow generating assets backing the ABSs shall be homogenous, i.e. it shall be possible to report them according to one of the types of loan-level templates referred to in Annex VIII, which shall relate to one of the following:
residential mortgages;
loans to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs);
auto loans;
consumer finance loans;
leasing receivables;
credit card receivables.
▼M6 —————
▼M4 —————
Article 74
Geographical restrictions concerning asset-backed securities and cash-flow generating assets
Article 75
Acquisition of cash-flow generating assets by the SPV
Article 76
Assessment of clawback rules for asset-backed securities
ABSs shall only be considered eligible if the Eurosystem has ascertained that its rights would be protected in an appropriate manner against clawback rules considered relevant by the Eurosystem under the law of the relevant EEA country. For this purpose, before the ABSs may be considered eligible, the Eurosystem may require:
an independent legal assessment in a form and substance acceptable to the Eurosystem that sets out the applicable clawback rules in the relevant country; and/or
other documents, such as a solvency certificate from the transferor for the suspect period, which is a certain period of time during which the sale of cash-flow generating assets backing the ABSs may be invalidated by a liquidator.
Clawback rules, which the Eurosystem considers to be severe and therefore not acceptable, shall include:
rules under which the sale of cash-flow generating assets backing the ABSs can be invalidated by a liquidator solely on the basis that the sale was concluded within the suspect period, as referred to in paragraph 1(b), before the declaration of insolvency of the seller; or
rules where such invalidation can only be prevented by the transferee if they can prove that they were not aware of the insolvency of the seller at the time of the sale.
For the purposes of this criterion, the seller may be the originator or intermediary, as applicable.
Article 77
Non-subordination of tranches for asset-backed securities
Article 77a
Restrictions on investments for asset-backed securities
Any investments of monies standing to the credit of the issuer's or of any intermediary SPV's bank accounts under the transaction documentation shall not consist, in whole or in part, actually or potentially, of tranches of other ABSs, credit-linked notes, swaps or other derivative instruments, synthetic securities or similar claims.
Article 78
Availability of loan level data for asset-backed securities
▼M9 —————
Article 79
Data requests for asset-backed securities
The Eurosystem shall reserve the right to request from any third party it considers relevant, including but not restricted to, the issuer, the originator and/or the arranger, any clarification and/or legal confirmation that it considers necessary to assess the eligibility of ABSs and with regard to the provision of loan-level data. If a third party fails to comply with a particular request, the Eurosystem may decide not to accept the ABSs as collateral or may decide to suspend the eligibility of such collateral.
Article 80
Eligibility criteria for covered bonds backed by asset-backed securities
Without prejudice to the eligibility of legislative covered bonds pursuant to Article 64a, in order for EEA legislative covered bonds backed by ABSs to be eligible, the cover pool of such bonds (for the purposes of paragraphs 1 to 4, ‘the cover pool’) shall only contain ABSs that comply with all of the following.
The cash-flow generating assets backing the ABSs meet the criteria laid down in Article 129(1)(d) to (f) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
The cash-flow generating assets were originated by an entity closely linked to the issuer, as described in Article 138.
They are used as a technical tool to transfer mortgages or guaranteed real estate loans from the originating entity into the cover pool.
Subject to paragraph 4, the NCBs shall use the following measures to verify that the cover pool does not contain ABSs that do not comply with paragraph 1.
On a quarterly basis, the NCBs shall request a self-certification and undertaking of the issuer confirming that the cover pool does not contain ABSs that do not comply with paragraph 1. The NCB’s request shall specify that the self-certification must be signed by the issuer’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chief Financial Officer (CFO) or a manager of similar seniority, or by an authorised signatory on their behalf.
On an annual basis, NCBs shall request an ex post confirmation by external auditors or cover pool monitors from the issuer, confirming that the cover pool does not contain ABSs that do not comply with paragraph 1 for the monitoring period.
Article 81
Eligibility criteria for debt certificates issued by the Eurosystem
Article 81a
Eligibility criteria for certain unsecured debt instruments issued by credit institutions or investment firms, or by their closely linked entities
By derogation from Article 64 and provided that they fulfil all other eligibility criteria, the following subordinated unsecured debt instruments issued by credit institutions or investment firms, or by their closely linked entities as referred to in Article 141(3), shall be eligible until maturity, provided that they are issued before 31 December 2018 and their subordination results neither from contractual subordination as defined in paragraph 2 nor from structural subordination pursuant to paragraph 3:
▼M7 —————
CHAPTER 2
Eurosystem's credit quality requirements for marketable assets
Article 82
Eurosystem's credit quality requirements for marketable assets
Further to the general rules set out in Article 59 and to the specific rules set out in Article 84, marketable assets shall comply with the following credit quality requirements in order to be eligible as collateral for Eurosystem credit operations:
With the exception of ABSs, all marketable assets shall have a credit assessment provided by at least one accepted ECAI system, expressed in the form of a public credit rating, in compliance with, as a minimum, credit quality step 3 in the Eurosystem's harmonised rating scale.
ABSs shall have credit assessments that are provided by at least two different accepted ECAI systems expressed in the form of two public credit ratings, one provided by each of these ECAI systems, in compliance with, as a minimum, credit quality step 2 in the Eurosystem's harmonised rating scale.
Article 83
Types of ECAI credit assessments used for credit quality assessments of marketable assets
The following types of ECAI credit assessments from accepted ECAIs shall be used in determining compliance with the credit quality requirements applicable to marketable assets.
(a) |
An ECAI issue rating : this rating refers to an ECAI credit assessment assigned to either an issue or, in the absence of an issue rating from the same ECAI, the programme or issuance series under which an asset is issued. An ECAI assessment for a programme or issuance series shall only be relevant if it applies to the particular asset in question and is explicitly and unambiguously matched with the asset's ISIN code by the ECAI, and a different issue rating from the same ECAI does not exist. For ECAI issue ratings, the Eurosystem shall make no distinction in respect of the original maturity of the asset. |
(b) |
An ECAI issuer rating : this rating refers to an ECAI credit assessment assigned to an issuer. For ECAI issuer ratings, the Eurosystem shall make a distinction in respect of the original maturity of the asset as regards the acceptable ECAI credit assessment. The distinction shall be made between:
(i)
short-term assets, i.e. those assets with an original maturity of up to and including 390 days; and
(ii)
long-term assets, i.e. those assets with an original maturity of more than 390 days. For short-term assets, ECAI short-term and long-term issuer ratings shall be acceptable. For long-term assets, only ECAI long-term issuer ratings shall be acceptable. |
(c) |
An ECAI guarantor rating : this rating refers to an ECAI credit assessment assigned to a guarantor, if the guarantee meets the requirements of Title IV. For ECAI guarantor ratings, the Eurosystem shall make no distinction in respect of the original maturity of the asset. Only ECAI long-term guarantor ratings shall be acceptable. |
Article 84
Priority of ECAI credit assessments in respect of marketable assets
For marketable assets, ECAI credit assessments which determine the compliance of the asset with the credit quality requirements shall be taken into account by the Eurosystem in accordance with the following rules:
For marketable assets other than marketable assets issued by central governments, regional governments, local governments, agencies, multilateral development banks or international organisations and ABSs, the following rules shall apply.
The Eurosystem shall consider ECAI issue ratings in priority to ECAI issuer or ECAI guarantor ratings. Without prejudice to the application of this priority rule, in accordance with Article 82(1)(a), at least one ECAI credit assessment must comply with the Eurosystem's applicable credit quality requirements.
If multiple ECAI issue ratings are available for the same issue, then the first-best of those ECAI issue ratings shall be taken into account by the Eurosystem. If the first-best ECAI issue rating does not comply with the Eurosystem's credit quality threshold for marketable assets, the asset shall not be eligible, even if a guarantee that is acceptable under Title IV exists.
In the absence of any ECAI issue rating or, in the case of covered bonds, in the absence of an issue rating fulfilling the requirements of Annex IXb, an ECAI issuer or ECAI guarantor rating may be considered by the Eurosystem. If multiple ECAI issuer and/or ECAI guarantor ratings are available for the same issue, then the first-best of those ratings shall be taken into account by the Eurosystem.
For marketable assets issued by central governments, regional governments, local governments, agencies, multilateral development banks or international organisations, the following rules shall apply.
In accordance with Article 82(1)(a), at least one ECAI credit assessment must comply with the Eurosystem's applicable credit quality requirements. The Eurosystem shall only consider ECAI issuer or ECAI guarantor ratings.
If multiple ECAI issuer and ECAI guarantor ratings are available, the first-best of those ratings shall be taken into account by the Eurosystem.
Covered bonds issued by agencies shall not be assessed in accordance with the rules in this point and shall instead be assessed in accordance with point (a).
For ABSs, the following rules shall apply.
In accordance with Article 82(1)(b), at least two ECAI credit assessments shall comply with the Eurosystem's applicable credit quality requirements. The Eurosystem shall only consider ECAI issue ratings.
If more than two ECAI issue ratings are available, the first- and second-best of such ECAI issue ratings shall be taken into account by the Eurosystem.
Article 85
Multi-issuer securities
For marketable assets with more than one issuer (multi-issuer securities), the applicable ECAI issuer rating shall be determined on the basis of each issuer's potential liability as follows:
If each issuer is jointly and severally liable for the obligations of all other issuers under the issue or, if applicable, for the programme, or issuance series, the ECAI issuer rating to be considered shall be the highest rating among the first-best ECAI issuer ratings of all the relevant issuers; or
If any issuer is not jointly and severally liable for the obligations of all other issuers under the issue or, if applicable, for the programme, or issuance series, the ECAI issuer rating to be considered shall be the lowest rating among the first-best ECAI issuer ratings of all the relevant issuers.
Article 86
Non-euro ratings
For the purpose of ECAI issuer ratings, a foreign currency rating shall be acceptable. If the asset is denominated in the domestic currency of the issuer, the local currency rating shall also be acceptable.
Article 87
Credit quality assessment criteria for marketable assets in the absence of a credit assessment provided by an accepted ECAI
If the debt instruments are issued or guaranteed by a regional government or a local authority or a ‘public sector entity’ as defined in point 8 of Article 4(1) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (hereinafter a ‘CRR public sector entity’) established in a Member State whose currency is the euro, the credit assessment shall be performed by the Eurosystem in accordance with the following rules.
If the issuers or guarantors are regional governments, local authorities or CRR public sector entities, which are treated for capital requirements purposes pursuant to Articles 115(2) or 116(4) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 equally to the central government in whose jurisdiction they are established, the debt instruments issued or guaranteed by these entities shall be allocated the credit quality step corresponding to the best credit rating provided by an accepted ECAI to the central government in whose jurisdiction these entities are established.
If the issuers or guarantors are regional governments, local authorities and CRR public sector entities which are not referred to in point (a) the debt instruments issued or guaranteed by these entities shall be allocated the credit step corresponding to one credit quality step below the best credit rating provided by an accepted ECAI to the central government in which jurisdiction these entities are established.
If the issuers or guarantors are ‘public sector entities’ as defined in point (75) of Article 2 and are not referred to in points (a) and (b), no implicit credit assessment is derived and the debt instruments issued or guaranteed by these entities shall be treated equally to debt instruments issued or guaranteed by private sector entities, i.e. as not having an appropriate credit assessment.
Subject to the provisions of Article 61(1), if the debt instruments are issued or guaranteed by non-financial corporations established in a Member State whose currency is the euro, the credit quality assessment shall be performed by the Eurosystem based on the credit quality assessment rules applicable to the credit quality assessment of credit claims in Chapter 2 of Title III.
Table 9
Implicit credit quality assessments for issuers or guarantors without an ECAI credit quality assessment
|
Allocation of issuers or guarantors under Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 (CRR (*1)) |
ECAF derivation of the implicit credit quality assessment of the issuer or guarantor belonging to the corresponding class |
Class 1 |
Regional governments, local authorities and CRR public sector entities (CRR PSEs) that are treated by the competent authorities in the same manner as the central government for capital requirements purposes pursuant to Articles 115(2) and 116(4) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 |
Allocated the ECAI credit quality assessment of the central government in whose jurisdiction the entity is established |
Class 2 |
Other regional governments, local authorities and CRR PSEs |
Allocated a credit quality assessment one credit quality step (*2) below the ECAI credit quality assessment of the central government in whose jurisdiction the entity is established |
Class 3 |
Public sector entities as defined in point (75) of Article 2 that are not CRR PSEs |
►M9 Treated like private sector issuers or debtors, i.e. their marketable assets are not eligible ◄ |
(*1)
Regulation (EU) No 575/2013, also referred to as the CRR for the purposes of this table.
(*2)
Information on the credit quality steps is published on the ECB's website. |
Article 88
Additional credit quality requirements for asset-backed securities
TITLE III
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND CREDIT QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR NON-MARKETABLE ASSETS
CHAPTER 1
Eligibility criteria for non-marketable assets
Article 89
Eligible type of asset
Article 90
Principal amount and coupons of credit claims
In order to be eligible, credit claims shall comply with the following requirements from the moment they are mobilised until their final redemption or demobilisation:
they have a fixed, unconditional principal amount; and
►M9 an interest rate that shall be one of the following: ◄
a ‘zero coupon’;
fixed;
floating, i.e. linked to a reference interest rate and with the following structure: coupon rate = reference rate ± x, with f ≤ coupon rate ≤ c, where:
their most recent cash flow was not negative. If a negative cash flow occurs, the credit claim is ineligible as at that moment. It may become eligible again after a cash flow that is not negative, provided it meets all other relevant requirements.
Article 91
Non-subordination
Credit claims may not afford rights to the principal and/or the interest that are subordinated to: (a) the rights of holders of other unsecured debt obligations of the debtor including other shares or sub-shares in the same syndicated loan; and (b) the rights of holders of debt instruments of the same issuer.
Article 92
Credit quality requirements for credit claims
The credit quality of credit claims is assessed on the basis of the credit quality of the debtor or guarantor. The relevant debtor or guarantor shall comply with the Eurosystem's credit quality requirements as specified in the ECAF rules for credit claims laid down in Chapter 2 of Title III of Part Four.
Article 93
Minimum size of credit claims
For domestic use, credit claims shall, at the time of their submission as collateral by the counterparty, meet a minimum size threshold of EUR 0, or any higher amount that may be laid down by the home NCB. For cross-border use, a minimum size threshold of EUR 500 000 shall apply.
Article 94
Currency of denomination of credit claims
Credit claims shall be denominated in euro or in one of the former currencies of the Member States whose currency is the euro.
Article 95
Type of debtor or guarantor
Article 96
Location of the debtor or guarantor
Article 97
Governing laws
The credit claim agreement and the agreement between the counterparty and the home NCB mobilising the credit claim as collateral shall both be governed by the law of a Member State whose currency is the euro. Furthermore, there shall be no more than two governing laws in total that apply to the:
counterparty;
creditor;
debtor;
guarantor (if relevant);
credit claim agreement;
the agreement between the counterparty and the home NCB mobilising the credit claim as collateral.
Article 98
Handling procedures
Credit claims shall be handled in accordance with the Eurosystem procedures laid down in the relevant national documentation of the NCBs.
Article 99
Additional legal requirements for credit claims
In order to ensure that a valid security is created over credit claims and that the credit claim can be swiftly realised in the event of a counterparty default, additional legal requirements shall be met. These legal requirements relate to:
verification of the existence of credit claims;
validity of the agreement for the mobilisation of credit claims;
full effect of the mobilisation vis-à-vis third parties;
an absence of restrictions concerning the mobilisation and realisation of credit claims;
an absence of restrictions concerning banking secrecy and confidentiality.
Article 100
Verifications of the procedures and systems used to submit credit claims
NCBs, or supervisors or external auditors, shall conduct a verification of the appropriateness of the procedures and systems used by the counterparty to submit the information on credit claims to the Eurosystem prior to the first mobilisation of credit claims by the counterparty. The verification of the procedures and systems shall subsequently be conducted at least once every five years. In the event of significant changes to such procedures or systems, a new verification may be conducted.
Article 101
Verification of existence of credit claims
The NCBs shall, as a minimum, take all of the following steps to verify the existence of credit claims mobilised as collateral:
They shall obtain a written confirmation from counterparties, at least each quarter, by which counterparties shall confirm:
the existence of the credit claims (this confirmation could be replaced with cross-checks of information held in central credit registers, where these exist);
the compliance of credit claims with the eligibility criteria applied by the Eurosystem;
that such credit claim is not used simultaneously as collateral to the benefit of any third party and that the counterparty shall not mobilise such credit claim as collateral to any third party;
that the counterparty will undertake to communicate to the relevant NCB no later than within the course of the next business day, any event that materially affects the contractual relationship between the counterparty and the NCB, in particular early, partial or total repayments, downgrades and material changes in the conditions of the credit claim.
They shall require counterparties to submit in relation to credit claims mobilised as collateral from May 2021, where applicable, the relevant analytical credit database (AnaCredit) identifiers (i.e. the ‘Observed Agent’ identifier, the ‘Contract’ identifier and the ‘Instrument’ identifier), as submitted under the statistical reporting requirements in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2016/867 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2016/13) ( 16 ).
They, or relevant central credit registers, banking supervision competent authorities or external auditors, shall perform random checks in respect of the quality and accuracy of the written confirmation of counterparties, by means of delivery of physical documentation or through on-site visits. The information checked in relation to each credit claim shall cover as a minimum the characteristics that determine the existence and the eligibility of credit claims. For counterparties with ECAF-approved internal ratings-based (IRB) systems, additional checks on the credit quality assessment of credit claims shall be carried out involving checks of PDs with respect to debtors of credit claims that are used as collateral in Eurosystem credit operations.
Article 102
Validity of the agreement for the mobilisation of credit claims
The agreement for the mobilisation of the credit claim as collateral shall be valid between the counterparty and the relevant NCB under the applicable national law. ►M9 All the necessary legal formalities to ensure the validity of the agreement and to ensure the mobilisation of a credit claim as collateral shall be fulfilled by the counterparty and/or the transferee, as appropriate. ◄
Article 103
Full effect of the mobilisation vis-à-vis third parties
As regards notification of the debtor, the following shall apply, depending on the applicable national law.
If debtor notification or public registration of the mobilisation of a credit claim as collateral is necessary to ensure full effectiveness of the mobilisation vis-à-vis third parties, and in particular to ensure the priority of the home NCB's security interest vis-à-vis other creditors, these notification or registration requirements shall be completed in advance or at the time of the credit claim's actual mobilisation as collateral.
If ex ante notification of the debtor or public registration of the mobilisation of a credit claim as collateral is not required in accordance with point (a), as specified in the applicable national documentation, ex post notification of the debtor is required. Ex post notification means that the debtor shall be notified by the counterparty or the home NCB, as specified by the national documentation, about the credit claim being mobilised as collateral by the counterparty to the benefit of the NCB immediately following an event of default or similar credit event as further specified in the applicable national documentation.
The NCBs may decide to require ex ante notification or public registration in advance or at the time of mobilisation, even if these formalities are not necessary for the purposes set out in point (a).
For credit claims that are bearer instruments, the home NCB may require that such bearer instruments are physically transferred to it or to a third party in advance, or at the time of actual mobilisation as collateral. The notification requirements set out in points (a) and (b) shall not apply to credit claims that are bearer instruments.
Article 104
Absence of restrictions concerning mobilisation and realisation of credit claims
Article 105
Absence of restrictions concerning banking secrecy and confidentiality
The counterparty and the debtor shall have agreed contractually that the debtor unconditionally consents to disclosure by the counterparty to the Eurosystem of details in respect of the credit claim and on the debtor that are required by the home NCB for the purpose of ensuring that a valid security is created over credit claims and that the credit claims can be swiftly realised in the event of a counterparty default. This requirement shall not be necessary if unrestricted provision of such information is ensured under the applicable national law, as specified in the applicable national documentation of the home NCB.
Article 106
Eligibility criteria for fixed-term deposits
Fixed-term deposits, as described in Article 12, that are held by a counterparty shall be eligible assets as collateral for Eurosystem credit operations.
Article 107
Eligibility criteria for RMBDs
Article 107a
Eligible type of asset
DECCs shall have a fixed, unconditional principal amount and a coupon structure that complies with the criteria set forth in Article 63. The cover pool shall only contain credit claims for which either:
a specific ECB DECC loan-level data reporting template; or
an ABS loan-level data reporting template in accordance with Article 73;
is available.
Article 107b
Non-subordination with respect to DECCs
DECCs shall not give rise to rights to the principal and/or the interest that are subordinated to the rights of holders of other debt instruments of the same issuer.
Article 107c
Credit quality requirements
DECCs shall comply with the Eurosystem's credit quality requirements as laid down in Section 3 of Chapter 2 of Title III of this Part Four.
Article 107d
Acquisition of the underlying credit claims by the issuer
The pool of underlying credit claims shall have been acquired by the issuer from the originator in a manner which the Eurosystem considers to be a ‘true sale’ or equivalent to a ‘true sale’ that is enforceable against any third party, and which is beyond the reach of the originator and its creditors, including in the event of the originator's insolvency.
Article 107e
Transparency requirements for DECCs
Data quality requirements applied for ABSs shall apply to DECCs, including the specific ECB DECC loan-level data reporting template. The loan-level data shall be submitted in the specific ECB DECC loan-level data reporting template, as published on the ECB's website, to:
an ESMA securitisation repository; or
a Eurosystem designated repository.
Submissions of loan-level data on DECCs to Eurosystem designated repositories in accordance with paragraph 5(b) shall be permitted until the end of the calendar month in which the date three years and three months from the ESMA reporting activation date falls.
The ESMA reporting activation date shall be published by the ECB on its website.
Article 107f
Types of eligible underlying credit claims
To ensure that a valid security is created over the underlying credit claims, enabling the issuer and the holders of the DECCs to swiftly realise those claims in the event of the originator's default, the following additional legal requirements as specified in paragraphs 3 to 9 shall be met:
verification of the existence of the underlying credit claims;
validity of the agreement for the mobilisation of underlying credit claims;
full effect of the mobilisation vis-à-vis third parties;
an absence of restrictions on the transfer of the underlying credit claims;
an absence of restrictions on the realisation of the underlying credit claims;
an absence of restrictions related to banking secrecy and confidentiality.
Further details of the specific features of the national jurisdictions shall be provided in the relevant national documentation of the NCBs.
The NCB of the country where the originator is established shall, as a minimum, take all of the following steps to verify the existence of the underlying credit claims:
It shall obtain written confirmation from the originator, at least on a quarterly basis, by which the originators shall confirm:
the existence of the underlying credit claims: this confirmation could be replaced with cross-checks of information held in central credit registers, where these exist;
compliance of the underlying credit claims with the eligibility criteria applied by the Eurosystem;
that the underlying credit claims are not used simultaneously as collateral to the benefit of any third party and that the originator will not mobilise such underlying credit claims as collateral to the Eurosystem or any third party;
that the originator will undertake to communicate to the relevant NCB no later than within the course of the next business day, any event that materially affects the collateral value of the underlying credit claims, in particular early, partial or total repayments, downgrades and material changes in the conditions of the underlying credit claims.
The NCB of the country where the originator is located or the relevant central credit registers, banking supervision competent authorities or external auditors, shall perform random checks in respect of the quality and accuracy of the written confirmation of originators, by means of delivery of physical documentation or through on-site visits. The information checked in relation to each underlying credit claim shall cover as a minimum the characteristics that determine the existence and the eligibility of underlying credit claims. For originators with ECAF-approved internal ratings-based (IRB) systems, additional checks on the credit quality assessment of underlying credit claims shall be carried out involving checks of PDs with respect to debtors of credit claims backing DECCs that are used as collateral in Eurosystem credit operations.
For the checks that are undertaken in accordance with Article 107f(3), (4)(a) or (4)(b) by NCB of the country where the originator is located, supervisors, external auditors or central credit registers, those undertaking the checks shall be authorised to carry out these investigations, if necessary contractually or in accordance with the applicable national requirements.
The agreement for the transfer of the underlying credit claims to the issuer or for their mobilisation by way of transfer, assignment or pledge shall be valid between the issuer and the originator and/or the transferee/assignee/pledgee, as appropriate, under the applicable national law. All the necessary legal formalities to ensure the validity of the agreement and to ensure the valid indirect or direct transfer of the underlying credit claims as collateral shall be fulfilled by the originator and/or the transferee, as appropriate. As regards notification of the debtor, the following shall apply, depending on the applicable national law.
At times it may be necessary to have debtor notification or public registration of: (i) the transfer (direct or indirect) of the underlying credit claims to the issuer; or (ii) when counterparties mobilise DECCs as collateral to the home NCB to ensure full effectiveness of such a transfer or mobilisation vis-à-vis third parties; and in particular (iii) to ensure the priority of the issuer's security interest (with respect to the underlying credit claims) and/or the home NCB's security interest (with respect to the DECCs as collateral) vis-à-vis other creditors. In such cases, these notification or registration requirements shall be completed: (i) in advance or at the time of the underlying credit claims' actual transfer (direct or indirect) to the issuer; or (ii) at the time that counterparties mobilise the DECCs as collateral to the home NCB.
If exante notification of the debtor or public registration is not required in accordance with point (a), as specified in the applicable national documentation, ex post notification of the debtor is required. Ex post notification means that the debtor shall be notified, as specified by national documentation, about the underlying credit claims being transferred or mobilised immediately following an event of default or similar credit event as further specified in the applicable national documentation.
Points (a) and (b) are minimum requirements. The Eurosystem may decide to require ex ante notification or registration in addition to the situations above, including in the case of bearer instruments.
Notwithstanding the paragraphs 6 and 7, a facility agent for the collection and distribution of payments and administration of the loan shall not be considered as a restriction on the transfer and realisation of a syndicated loan share, provided that:
the facility agent is a credit institution located in a Member State; and
the service relationship between the relevant syndicate member and the facility agent can be transferred alongside or as part of the syndicated loan share.
CHAPTER 2
Eurosystem's credit quality requirements for non-marketable assets
Article 108
Eurosystem's credit quality requirements for non-marketable assets
In order for non-marketable assets to be eligible, the following Eurosystem credit quality requirements shall apply.
For credit claims, the credit quality of credit claims shall be assessed on the basis of the credit quality of the debtor or guarantor, which shall comply, as a minimum, with credit quality step 3, as specified in the Eurosystem's harmonised rating scale.
For RMBDs, a credit quality assessment shall comply, as a minimum, with credit quality step 2, as specified in the Eurosystem's harmonised rating scale.
Article 109
General rules for the credit quality assessment of credit claims
Article 110
Selection of the credit assessment system or source
Article 111
Credit assessment of credit claims with public sector entities, or non-financial corporations, as debtors or guarantors
The Eurosystem shall assess the credit quality of credit claims with public sector entities acting as debtors or guarantors in accordance with the following rules, applied in the following order.
If a credit assessment from the system or source selected by the counterparty exists, the Eurosystem shall use it to establish whether the public sector entity acting as debtor or guarantor meets the Eurosystem's credit quality requirements for non-marketable assets laid down in Article 108.
In the absence of a credit assessment under point (a), the Eurosystem shall use an ECAI credit assessment provided by an accepted ECAI system for the public sector entity acting as debtor or guarantor.
If a credit assessment is unavailable pursuant to points (a) or (b), the procedure laid down in Article 87 for marketable assets shall apply to the relevant public sector entity as debtor or guarantor.
Article 112
Establishment of Eurosystem's credit quality requirements for RMBDs
For the purpose of meeting the credit quality requirements laid down in Article 108, the home NCB shall assess the credit quality of RMBDs on the basis of a jurisdiction-specific credit quality assessment framework laid down in the applicable national documentation.
Article 112a
The Eurosystem's credit quality requirements for DECCs
TITLE IV
GUARANTEES FOR MARKETABLE AND NON-MARKETABLE ASSETS
Article 113
Applicable requirements for guarantees
Article 114
Features of the guarantee
Article 115
Non-subordination of the obligations of the guarantor
The obligations of the guarantor under the guarantee shall at least rank equally, pari passu, and rateably, pro rata, with all other unsecured obligations of the guarantor.
Article 116
Credit quality requirements for guarantors
The guarantor shall comply with the Eurosystem's credit quality requirements specified under the ECAF rules for guarantors of marketable assets laid down in Articles 82 to 84 or with the rules for guarantors of credit claims laid down in Article 108.
Article 117
Type of guarantor
The guarantor shall be:
for marketable assets in accordance with Article 69: a central bank of a Member State, a public sector entity, an agency, a credit institution, a financial corporation other than a credit institution, a non-financial corporation, a multilateral development bank or an international organisation; or
for credit claims in accordance with Article 95: a non-financial corporation, a public sector entity, a multilateral development bank or an international organisation.
Article 118
Place of establishment of guarantor
The guarantor shall be established:
in the case of marketable assets in accordance with Article 70, in the EEA, unless a guarantee is not needed to establish the credit quality requirements for a specific debt instrument. The possibility to use an ECAI guarantor rating to establish the relevant credit quality requirements for marketable assets is addressed in Article 84.
for debt instruments guaranteed by non-financial corporations for which no credit assessment has been provided by an accepted ECAI for the issue, the issuer or the guarantor, in accordance with Article 70, the guarantor shall be established in a Member State whose currency is the euro;
in the case of credit claims in accordance with Article 96, in a Member State whose currency is the euro, unless a guarantee is not needed to establish the credit quality requirements for non-marketable assets. The option to use a credit assessment in respect of a guarantor to establish the relevant credit quality requirements for credit claims is addressed in Article 108.
TITLE V
EUROSYSTEM CREDIT ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK FOR ELIGIBLE ASSETS
Article 119
Accepted credit assessment sources and systems
The credit assessment information on which the Eurosystem bases the eligibility assessment of assets eligible as collateral for Eurosystem credit operations shall be provided by credit assessment systems belonging to one of the three following sources:
ECAIs;
NCBs' in-house credit assessment systems (ICASs);
counterparties' internal rating-based (IRB) systems.
Article 120
General acceptance criteria for external credit assessment institutions as credit assessment systems
For the purposes of the ECAF, the general acceptance criteria for ECAIs shall be the following:
ECAIs shall be registered by the European Securities and Markets Authority in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009.
ECAIs shall fulfil operational criteria and provide relevant coverage so as to ensure the efficient implementation of the ECAF. In particular, the use of an ECAI credit assessment is subject to the availability to the Eurosystem of information on these assessments, as well as information for the comparison and the assignment, i.e. mapping of the assessments to the Eurosystem's credit quality steps and for the purposes of the performance monitoring process under Article 126.
Article 121
General acceptance criteria and operational procedures for the NCBs' in-house credit assessment systems
Article 122
General acceptance criteria for internal ratings-based systems
A request filed by a counterparty in accordance with paragraph 1 shall include the following information and documents which, if necessary, shall be translated into a working language of the home NCB:
a copy of the decision of the competent authority authorising the counterparty to use its IRB system for capital requirements purposes on a consolidated or non-consolidated basis, together with any specific conditions for such use;
an up-to-date assessment by the competent authority reflecting the currently available information on all issues affecting the use of the IRB for collateral purposes and all issues relating to the data used for the ECAF performance monitoring process;
information on any changes to the counterparty's IRB system recommended or required by the competent authority, together with the deadline by which such changes must be implemented;
information on its approach to assigning probabilities of default to debtors, as well as data on the rating grades and associated one-year probabilities of default used to determine eligible rating grades;
a copy of the latest Pillar 3 (market discipline) information that the counterparty is required to publish on a regular basis in accordance with the requirements on market discipline under the Basel III Framework, Directive 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 575/2013;
the name and the address of the competent authority and the external auditor;
information on the historical record of the counterparty's IRB system's observed default rates per rating grades covering the five calendar years preceding the relevant request. If the competent authority granted the IRB system's authorisation for capital requirements purposes during these calendar years, the information shall cover the time since the IRB system's authorisation for capital requirements purposes. The historical annual data on the observed default rates and potential additional information shall comply with the provisions for performance monitoring in Article 126 as if the IRB system had been subject to these provisions over this time period;
information required for performance monitoring outlined in Article 126 as requested from already ECAF-approved IRB systems for the ongoing calendar year at the time of the filing of the request.
Article 123
Reporting obligations of counterparties using an internal ratings-based system
Counterparties shall fulfil any further operational criteria specified in the relevant contractual or regulatory arrangements applied by the home NCB, including provisions in relation to:
ad hoc checks on the procedures in place for communicating a credit claim's features to the home NCB;
annual checks by the home NCB (or, where relevant, the competent authority or external auditor) to establish the accuracy and validity of static pools as referred to in Annex IX;
the provision, no later than within the course of the next business day, of information in respect of eligibility changes and the immediate withdrawal of relevant credit claims, if necessary;
notifications to the home NCB of facts or circumstances that could materially influence the continued use of the IRB system for ECAF purposes or the way in which the IRB system leads to the establishment of eligible collateral, including in particular material changes to a counterparty's IRB system which may impact on the manner in which the IRB system's rating grades or probabilities of default correspond with the Eurosystem harmonised rating scale.
▼M7 —————
Article 126
ECAF performance monitoring process
TITLE VI
RISK CONTROL AND VALUATION FRAMEWORK OF MARKETABLE AND NON-MARKETABLE ASSETS
Article 127
Purpose of the risk control and valuation framework
Article 128
Risk control measures
The Eurosystem shall apply the following risk control measures for eligible assets:
valuation haircuts as laid down in Guideline (EU) 2016/65 of the European Central Bank (ECB/2015/35) ( 17 );
variation margins (marking-to-market):
the Eurosystem requires the haircut-adjusted market value of the eligible assets used in its liquidity-providing reverse transactions to be maintained over time. If the value of the eligible assets, which are measured on a daily basis, falls below a certain level, the home NCB shall require the counterparty to supply additional assets or cash by way of a margin call. Similarly, if the value of the eligible assets exceeds a certain level following their revaluation, the NCB may return the excess assets or cash;
limits in relation to the use of unsecured debt instruments issued by a credit institution or by any other entity with which that credit institution has close links as described in Article 138;
valuation markdowns as laid down in Guideline (EU) 2016/65 (ECB/2015/35).
The Eurosystem may apply the following additional risk control measures:
initial margins, meaning that counterparties provide eligible assets with a value at least equal to the liquidity provided by the Eurosystem plus the value of the relevant initial margin;
limits in relation to issuers, debtors or guarantors: the Eurosystem may apply additional limits, other than those applied to the use of unsecured debt instruments referred to in paragraph (1)(c), to the exposure vis-à-vis issuers, debtors or guarantors;
supplementary haircuts;
additional guarantees from guarantors meeting the Eurosystem's credit quality requirements in order to accept certain assets;
the exclusion of certain assets from use as collateral in Eurosystem credit operations.
CHAPTER 1
Risk control measures for marketable assets
▼M3 —————
CHAPTER 2
Risk control measures for non-marketable assets
▼M3 —————
CHAPTER 3
Valuation rules for marketable and non-marketable assets
Article 134
Valuation rules for marketable assets
For the purposes of determining the value of assets used as collateral in open market operations conducted by means of reverse transactions, the NCBs shall apply the following rules.
For each eligible marketable asset, the Eurosystem shall define the most representative price to be used for the calculation of the market value.
A marketable asset's value shall be calculated on the basis of the most representative price on the business day preceding its valuation date. In the absence of a representative price for a particular asset the Eurosystem shall define a theoretical price.
The market or theoretical value of a marketable asset shall be calculated including accrued interest.
Depending on differences in national legal systems and operational practices, the treatment of income flows, e.g. coupon payments that are related to an asset and are received during the life of a Eurosystem credit operation, may differ between NCBs. If the income flow is transferred to the counterparty, the home NCB shall ensure that the relevant operations will still be fully covered by a sufficient amount of eligible assets before the transfer of the income takes place. Each NCB shall aim to ensure that the economic effect of the treatment of income flows is equivalent to a situation in which the income is transferred to the counterparty on the payment day.
Article 135
Valuation rules for non-marketable assets
Non-marketable assets shall be assigned a value by the Eurosystem corresponding to the outstanding amount of such non-marketable assets.
Article 136
Margin calls
TITLE VII
ACCEPTANCE OF NON EURO-DENOMINATED COLLATERAL IN CONTINGENCIES
Article 137
Acceptance of non-euro-denominated collateral in contingencies
The ECB's Governing Council may decide to accept certain marketable assets issued by non-euro area G10 central governments in their national currency as collateral. Upon such a decision by the ECB's Governing Council, counterparties shall be informed about the applicable:
eligibility criteria;
procedures for selection and mobilisation;
sources and principles of valuation;
risk control measures;
settlement procedures.
The general eligibility criteria for marketable assets laid down in Title II of Part Four shall apply, except that marketable assets:
may be issued, held and settled outside the EEA;
may be denominated in currencies other than the euro; and
shall not have a coupon value that results in a negative cash flow.
TITLE VIII
RULES FOR THE USE OF ELIGIBLE ASSETS
Article 138
Close links between counterparties and the issuer, debtor or guarantor of eligible assets
‘Close links’ means any of the following situations in which the counterparty and the other entity referred to in paragraph 1 are linked:
the counterparty owns directly, or indirectly through one or more other undertakings, 20 % or more of the capital of that other entity;
that other entity owns directly, or indirectly through one or more other undertakings, 20 % or more of the capital of the counterparty;
a third party owns, either directly or indirectly through one or more undertakings, 20 % or more of the capital of the counterparty and 20 % or more of the capital of the other entity.
For the purposes of assessing the existence of close links in the case of multi-cédulas, the Eurosystem shall apply a ‘look-through approach’, i.e. it shall consider close links between each of the underlying cédulas issuers and the counterparty.
Paragraph 1 shall not apply with respect to any of the following:
close links, as defined under paragraph 2, created as a result of the existence of an EEA public sector entity that has the right to levy taxes and is either (i) an entity that owns directly, or indirectly through one or more undertakings, 20 % or more of the capital of the counterparty, or (ii) a third party that owns, either directly or indirectly through one or more undertakings, 20 % or more of the capital of the counterparty and 20 % or more of the capital of the other entity, provided that no other close links exist between the counterparty and the other entity except the close links resulting from one or more EEA public sector entities that have the right to levy taxes;
EEA-legislative covered bonds that:
meet the requirements set out in Article 129(1) to (3) and (6) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013;
do not contain in their cover pool unsecured debt instruments issued by the counterparty or any other entity closely linked to that counterparty, as defined in paragraph 2, and fully guaranteed by one or several EEA public sector entities which have the right to levy taxes; and
have an ECAI issue rating as defined in point (a) of Article 83 which fulfils the requirements of Annex IXb;
non-marketable RMBDs and DECCs;
multi-cédulas issued before 1 May 2015 where the underlying cédulas comply with the criteria set out in Article 129(1) to (3) and (6) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013.
If compliance with paragraph 3(b)(ii) needs to be verified, that is, for EEA legislative covered bonds, where the applicable legislation or prospectus do not exclude debt instruments referred to in paragraph 3(b)(ii) as cover pool assets and where the counterparty or an entity closely linked to the counterparty has issued such debt instruments, NCBs may take all or some of the following measures to conduct ad hoc checks of compliance with paragraph 3(b)(ii).
NCBs may obtain regular surveillance reports providing an overview of assets in the cover pool of EEA legislative covered bonds;
If surveillance reports do not provide sufficient information for verification purposes, NCBs may obtain a self-certification and undertaking of the counterparty mobilising an EEA legislative covered bond by which the counterparty shall confirm that the cover pool of EEA legislative covered bonds does not include, in breach of paragraph 3(b)(ii), unsecured bank bonds which are issued by that counterparty or any other entity closely linked to that counterparty, and are fully guaranteed by one or several EEA public entities which have the right to levy taxes. The counterparty’s self-certification must be signed by the counterparty’s CEO, CFO or a manager of similar seniority, or by an authorised signatory on their behalf.
On an annual basis, NCBs may obtain from the counterparty mobilising an EEA-legislative covered bond an ex post confirmation by external auditors or cover pool monitors that the cover pool of EEA legislative covered bonds does not include, in breach of paragraph 3(b)(ii), unsecured bank bonds which are issued by that counterparty or any other entity closely linked to that counterparty, and are fully guaranteed by one or several EEA public sector entities which have the right to levy taxes.
If the counterparty does not provide the self-certification or confirmation referred to in points (b) and (c) upon request from the NCB, the EEA legislative covered bond shall not be mobilised as collateral by that counterparty.
Article 138a
Use of debt instruments in connection with in-kind recapitalisation with public debt instruments
Public debt instruments used in an in-kind recapitalisation of a counterparty may only be used as collateral by that counterparty or by any other counterparty which has ‘close links’, as defined in Article 138(2), to that counterparty if the Eurosystem considers that the level of market access of their issuer is adequate, also taking into account the role played by such instruments in the recapitalisation.
Article 139
Use of guaranteed unsecured debt instruments issued by a counterparty or its closely linked entity
▼M9 —————
▼M9 —————
Article 140
Close links with respect to asset-backed securities and currency hedges
A counterparty may not mobilise as collateral any asset-backed securities if the counterparty, or any entity with which it has close links, as laid down in Article 138, provides a currency hedge to the asset-backed securities by entering into a currency hedge transaction with the issuer as a hedge counterparty.
Article 141
Limits with respect to unsecured debt instruments issued by credit institutions and their closely linked entities
A counterparty shall not submit or use as collateral unsecured debt instruments issued by a credit institution or by any other entity with which that credit institution has close links, to the extent that the value of such collateral issued by that credit institution or other entity with which it has close links taken together exceeds ►M8 10 % ◄ of the total value of the assets used as collateral by that counterparty after the applicable haircut. This threshold shall not apply in the following cases:
if the value of such assets does not exceed EUR 50 million after any applicable haircut;
if such assets are guaranteed by a public sector entity which has the right to levy taxes by way of a guarantee that complies with the features laid down in Article 114; or
if such assets are issued by an agency, a multilateral development bank or an international organisation.
Article 142
Liquidity support in respect of asset-backed securities
For liquidity support in the form of cash reserves, a counterparty shall not be permitted to mobilise as collateral any asset-backed securities if the following three conditions are met simultaneously:
the counterparty has close links with the issuer account bank in the asset-backed securities transaction;
the current amount of the reserve fund of the asset-backed securities transaction is greater than 5 % of the initial outstanding amount of all senior and subordinated tranches of the asset-backed securities transaction;
the current amount of the reserve fund of the asset-backed securities transaction is greater than 25 % of the current outstanding amount of the subordinated tranches of the asset-backed securities transaction.
For liquidity support in the form of liquidity facilities, a counterparty shall not be permitted to mobilise as collateral any asset-backed securities if the following two conditions are met simultaneously:
the counterparty has close links with a liquidity facility provider; and
the current amount of the liquidity facility of the asset-backed securities transaction is greater than 20 % of the initial outstanding amount of all senior and subordinated tranches of the asset-backed securities transaction.
▼M4 —————
Article 144
Non-acceptance of eligible assets for operational reasons
Irrespective of the fact that an asset is eligible, an NCB may, for operational reasons, request the counterparty to remove such asset before the occurrence of a cash flow, including payment of principal or coupons, as further defined in the relevant national documentation.
Article 144a
Eligible assets with negative cash flows
If a counterparty fails to effect timely payment pursuant to paragraph 1, the Eurosystem may, but is not obliged to, discharge the relevant payment. NCBs shall provide that a counterparty shall refund the Eurosystem, immediately upon request from the Eurosystem, of any amount of negative cash flows paid by the Eurosystem as a result of the counterparty's failure. If a counterparty fails to make a timely payment pursuant to paragraph 1, the Eurosystem shall have the right to debit immediately and without prior notification an amount equal to the amount the Eurosystem has to pay on behalf of such counterparty either from:
the relevant counterparty's payment module (PM) account in TARGET2, as provided for in Article 36(6) of Annex II to Guideline ECB/2012/27; or
with the prior authorisation of a settlement bank, the TARGET2 PM account of a settlement bank, used for the relevant counterparty's Eurosystem credit operations; or
any other account that can be used for Eurosystem monetary policy operations and that the relevant counterparty has with the NCB,
Article 145
Notification, valuation and removal of assets that are ineligible or contravene the rules for the use of eligible assets
Article 146
Sanctions for non-compliance with the rules for the use of eligible assets
Non-compliance with the rules laid down in this Title shall be subject to sanctions, as applicable, in accordance with Articles 154 to 157. Sanctions shall be applicable, regardless of whether a counterparty is actively participating in monetary policy operations.
Article 147
Information sharing within the Eurosystem
For monetary policy implementation purposes, in particular to monitor compliance with the rules for the use of eligible assets, the Eurosystem shall share information on capital holdings provided by the competent authority for such purposes. The information shall be subject to the same secrecy standards as those applied by the competent authority.
TITLE IX
CROSS-BORDER USE OF ELIGIBLE ASSETS
Article 148
General principles
Counterparties may mobilise eligible assets other than fixed-term deposits, for cross-border use in accordance with the following:
marketable assets shall be mobilised via one of the following: (i) eligible links; (ii) applicable CCBM procedures; (iii) eligible links in combination with the CCBM procedures;
DECCs and RMBDs shall be mobilised in accordance with applicable CCBM procedures; and
credit claims shall be mobilised either (i) via applicable CCBM procedures or (ii) in accordance with domestic procedures, as laid down in the relevant national documentation of the home NCB.
Article 149
CCBM
Article 150
Eligible links between SSSs
Article 151
CCBM in combination with eligible links
Article 152
CCBM and tri-party collateral management services
In order to provide its tri-party collateral management services for cross-border use by the Eurosystem in accordance with the first subparagraph, the relevant TPA shall comply with the set of additional functional requirements laid down by the Eurosystem, as referred to in the ‘Correspondent central banking model (CCBM) – Procedures for Eurosystem counterparties’ (Section 2.1.3, second paragraph).
PART FIVE
SANCTIONS IN THE EVENT OF A FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COUNTERPARTY OBLIGATIONS
Article 153
Sanctions for non-compliance as regards minimum reserves
Article 154
Sanctions for non-compliance with certain operational rules
In accordance with the provisions of the contractual or regulatory arrangements applied by it, the NCB shall impose one or more sanctions if a counterparty fails to comply with any of the following obligations:
as regards reverse transactions and foreign exchange swaps for monetary policy purposes, the obligations, as laid down in Article 15, to adequately collateralise and settle the amount the counterparty has been allotted over the whole term of a particular operation including any outstanding amount of a particular operation in the case of early termination executed by the NCB over the remaining term of an operation;
as regards collection of fixed-term deposits, outright transactions and the issuance of ECB debt certificates, the obligation to settle the transaction, as laid down in Article 16;
as regards the use of eligible assets, the obligation to mobilise or use only eligible assets and comply with the rules for the use of eligible assets in Title VIII of Part Four;
as regards end-of-day procedures and access conditions for the marginal lending facility, the obligation to present sufficient eligible assets in advance as collateral in cases where there is any remaining negative balance on a counterparty's settlement account in TARGET2 after finalisation of the end-of-day control procedures and an automatic request for recourse to the marginal lending facility is therefore considered to arise, as laid down in Article 19(6);
any payment obligations pursuant to Article 144a(3).
A sanction imposed pursuant to this Article shall involve:
a financial penalty only; or
both a financial penalty and a non-financial penalty.
Article 155
Financial penalties for non-compliance with certain operational rules
Article 156
Non-financial penalties for non-compliance with certain operational rules
If a counterparty fails to comply with an obligation referred to in either Article 154(1)(a) or (b) on more than two occasions in a 12-month period and in respect of each failure:
a financial penalty was imposed;
each decision to impose a financial penalty was notified to the counterparty;
each occasion of non-compliance relates to the same type of non-compliance,
the Eurosystem shall suspend the counterparty on the occasion of the third failure and each such subsequent failure to comply with an obligation of that same type in the relevant 12-month period. The 12-month period shall be calculated from the date of the first failure to comply with an obligation referred to in either Article 154(1)(a) or (b), as applicable.
If a counterparty fails to comply with an obligation referred to in Article 154(1)(c) on more than two occasions in a 12-month period and in respect of each failure:
a financial penalty was imposed;
each decision to impose a financial penalty was notified to the counterparty;
each occasion of non-compliance relates to the same type of non-compliance,
the Eurosystem shall, on the occasion of the third failure to comply, suspend the counterparty from the first liquidity-providing open market operation within the reserve maintenance period following the notification of the suspension.
If subsequently the counterparty again fails to comply, it shall be suspended from the first liquidity-providing open market operation within the reserve maintenance period following notification of suspension until a 12-month period lapses without any further such failure on the part of the counterparty.
Each 12-month period shall be calculated from the date of the notification of a sanction for failure to comply with an obligation referred to in Article 154(1)(c). Second and third breaches committed within 12 months from that notification will be taken into account.
Article 157
Application of non-financial penalties to branches for non-compliance with certain operational rules
When the Eurosystem suspends a counterparty in accordance with Article 156(5), that suspension may also be applied to branches of that counterparty established in other Member States whose currency is the euro.
PART SIX
DISCRETIONARY MEASURES
Article 158
Discretionary measures on the grounds of prudence or following an event of default
On the grounds of prudence, the Eurosystem may take any of the following measures:
suspend, limit or exclude a counterparty's access to Eurosystem monetary policy operations, pursuant to any contractual or regulatory arrangements applied by its home NCB or by the ECB;
reject, limit the use of or apply supplementary haircuts to assets mobilised as collateral in Eurosystem credit operations by a specific counterparty on the basis of any information the Eurosystem considers relevant, in particular if the credit quality of the counterparty appears to exhibit a high correlation with the credit quality of the assets mobilised as collateral.
In the context of its assessment of financial soundness of a counterparty pursuant to Article 55(c) and without prejudice to any other discretionary measures, the Eurosystem may limit, on the grounds of prudence, access to Eurosystem monetary policy operations by the following counterparties:
counterparties for which information on capital and/or leverage ratios under Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 is incomplete or not made available to the relevant NCB and the ECB in a timely manner and at the latest within 14 weeks from the end of the relevant quarter;
counterparties which are not required to report capital and leverage ratios under Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 but for which information of a comparable standard as referred to in Article 55(b)(iii) is incomplete or not made available to the relevant NCB and the ECB in a timely manner and at the latest within 14 weeks from the end of the relevant quarter.
Access shall be restored once the relevant information has been made available to the relevant NCB and it has been determined that the counterparty fulfils the criterion of financial soundness pursuant to Article 55(c). If the relevant information has not been made available at the latest within 20 weeks from the end of the relevant quarter, the counterparty’s access to Eurosystem monetary policy operations shall be automatically suspended on the grounds of prudence.
In addition to limiting access to Eurosystem monetary policy operations under paragraph 4, the Eurosystem may, on the grounds of prudence, suspend, further limit or exclude counterparties from accessing Eurosystem monetary policy operations if they are deemed to be ‘failing or likely to fail’ under paragraph 4 and they meet any of the following:
are not made subject to a resolution action by the resolution authority because there are reasonable prospects that an alternative private sector measure or supervisory action, as referred to in Article 18(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 and national legislation implementing Article 32(1)(b) of Directive 2014/59/EU, would prevent the failure of the institution within a reasonable timeframe, in view of the development of the alternative private sector measure or supervisory action;
are assessed as meeting the conditions for resolution pursuant to Article 18(1) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 or national legislation implementing Article 32(1) of Directive 2014/59/EU, in view of the development of the resolution action;
result from a resolution action as defined under Article 3(10) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 and national legislation implementing Article 2(40) of Directive 2014/59/EU or from an alternative private sector measure or supervisory action as referred to in Article 18(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 and national legislation implementing Article 32(1)(b) of Directive 2014/59/EU.
Article 159
Discretionary measures relating to the Eurosystem's credit quality assessment
The Eurosystem may exclude the following assets from the list of eligible marketable assets:
assets issued, co-issued, serviced or guaranteed by counterparties, or entities closely linked to counterparties subject to freezing of funds and/or other measures imposed by the Union under Article 75 of the Treaty or by a Member State restricting the use of funds; and/or
assets issued, co-issued, serviced or guaranteed by counterparties, or entities closely linked to counterparties in respect of which the Eurosystem has suspended, limited or excluded their access to Eurosystem monetary policy operations.
PART SEVEN
ADDITIONAL MINIMUM COMMON FEATURES IN RELATION TO EUROSYSTEM MONETARY POLICY OPERATIONS
Article 160
Legal relationship between the Eurosystem central banks and counterparties
The Eurosystem shall ensure that their contractual or regulatory arrangements in respect of their counterparties as referred to in Article 1(3) are in conformity with the provisions of Part Seven.
CHAPTER 1
Additional minimum common features applicable to all arrangements for Eurosystem monetary policy operations
Article 161
Amendments to the implementation of the Eurosystem monetary policy framework
Article 162
Denomination of payments
Each NCB shall apply contractual or regulatory arrangements which stipulate that all payments relating to Eurosystem monetary policy operations, other than foreign currency payments in foreign exchange swaps for monetary policy purposes, must be in euro.
Article 163
Form of contractual arrangements
If it is necessary to constitute all transactions under the agreement as a single contractual arrangement and/or to constitute the agreement as a master agreement to allow effective termination and close-out (including netting) of all outstanding transactions upon an event of default, the contractual or regulatory arrangements applied by the NCB shall provide for such arrangements.
Article 164
Forms, data carriers and means of communication
Each NCB shall apply contractual or regulatory arrangements which ensure that, in the relationship between the NCB and counterparties, appropriate and unambiguous rules relating to the use of forms, including the confirmation of terms of transactions, data carriers and the means and specifics of communication, are in place.
Article 165
Events of default
Each NCB shall apply contractual or regulatory arrangements that, as a minimum, provide for events of default that are not materially different from the following:
a decision is made by a competent judicial or other authority to implement, in relation to the counterparty, a procedure for the winding-up of the counterparty or the appointment of a liquidator or analogous officer over the counterparty, or any other analogous procedure;
a decision is made by a competent judicial or other authority to implement, in relation to the counterparty, a reorganisation measure or other analogous procedure intended to safeguard or restore the financial situation of the counterparty and to avoid the taking of a decision of the kind referred to in point (a);
a declaration by the counterparty in writing of its inability to pay all or any part of its debts or to meet its obligations arising in relation to monetary policy transactions, or a voluntary general agreement or arrangement entered into by it with its creditors, or if the counterparty is, or is deemed to be, insolvent or is deemed to be unable to pay its debts;
procedural steps preliminary to a decision being taken under points (a) or (b);
any representation or other pre-contractual statement made by the counterparty, or which is implied to have been made by the counterparty, under applicable provisions of law that is incorrect or untrue;
the counterparty's authorisation to conduct activities under either: (a) Directive 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 575/2013; or (b) Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 19 ), as implemented in the relevant Member State whose currency is the euro, is suspended or revoked;
the counterparty is suspended or expelled from membership of any payment system or arrangement through which payments under monetary policy transactions are made or (except for foreign exchange swap transactions) is suspended or expelled from membership of any SSS used for the settlement of Eurosystem monetary policy operations;
measures such as those referred to in Articles 41(1), 43(1) and 44 of Directive 2013/36/EU are taken against the counterparty;
in relation to reverse transactions, the counterparty fails to comply with provisions concerning risk control measures;
in relation to repurchase transactions, the counterparty fails to pay the purchase price or the repurchase price or fails to deliver purchased or repurchased assets; or in relation to collateralised loans, the counterparty fails to deliver assets or reimburse the credit on the applicable dates for such payments and deliveries;
in relation to foreign exchange swaps for monetary policy purposes and fixed-term deposits, the counterparty fails to pay the euro amount; or in relation to foreign exchange swaps for monetary policy purposes, fails to pay foreign currency amounts on the applicable dates for such payments;
the occurrence of an event of default, not materially different from those defined in this Article, in relation to the counterparty under an agreement concluded for the purposes of the management of the foreign reserves or own funds of the ECB or any NCBs;
the counterparty fails to provide relevant information, thus causing severe consequences for the home NCB;
the counterparty fails to perform any other of its other obligations under arrangements for reverse transactions and foreign exchange swap transactions and, if capable of remedy, does not remedy such failure within a maximum of 30 days in the case of collateralised transactions and a maximum of 10 days for foreign exchange swap transactions after notice is given by the NCB requiring it to do so;
an event of default occurs in relation to the counterparty in any agreement with another member of the Eurosystem entered into for the purpose of effecting Eurosystem monetary policy operations in respect of which that other member of the Eurosystem has exercised its right to close out any transaction under such agreement by reason of the event of default;
the counterparty becomes subject to freezing of funds and/or other measures imposed by the Union under Article 75 of the Treaty restricting the counterparty's ability to use its funds;
the counterparty becomes subject to the freezing of funds and/or other measures imposed by a Member State whose currency is the euro restricting the counterparty's ability to use its funds;
all or a substantial part of the counterparty's assets are subject to a freezing order, attachment, seizure or any other procedure that is intended to protect the public interest or the rights of the counterparty's creditors;
all or a substantial part of the counterparty's assets are assigned to another entity;
any other impending or existing event, the occurrence of which may threaten the performance by the counterparty of its obligations under the arrangement it entered into for the purpose of effecting Eurosystem monetary policy operations or any other rules applying to the relationship between the counterparty and any of the NCBs.
Article 166
Remedies in the event of default or on the grounds of prudence
Each NCB shall apply contractual or regulatory arrangements which ensure that, if an event of default occurs, or on the grounds of prudence, the NCB is entitled to exercise any of the following remedies:
suspending, limiting or excluding the counterparty from access to open market operations;
suspending, limiting or excluding the counterparty from access to the standing facilities;
terminating all outstanding agreements and transactions;
demanding accelerated performance of claims that have not yet matured or are contingent;
using deposits of the counterparty placed with the NCB to set off claims against that counterparty;
suspending the performance of obligations against the counterparty until the claim on the counterparty has been satisfied.
Each NCB may apply contractual or regulatory arrangements which, if an event of default occurs, entitle the home NCB to exercise any of the following remedies, in addition to the remedies referred to in paragraph 1:
claiming default interest; and
claiming an indemnity for any losses sustained as a consequence of a default by the counterparty.
Article 167
Provision of information by counterparties
Each NCB shall apply contractual or regulatory arrangements which ensure that an NCB may obtain any relevant information from counterparties in relation to Eurosystem monetary policy operations.
Article 168
Notices and other communications
Article 169
Third-party rights
Each NCB shall apply contractual or regulatory arrangements which provide that only the contracting or home NCB and the identified counterparty have rights and obligations arising under the transaction. However, such contractual or regulatory arrangements shall allow for the relationships between NCBs and/or the ECB:
arising out of the cross-border use of eligible assets; and
as necessary for operations effected with counterparties acting through an intermediary institution.
Article 170
Governing law and jurisdiction
Article 171
Settlement days with regard to fixed-term deposits
Each NCB shall apply deposit arrangements which specify that settlement with regard to both taking in and paying out fixed-term deposits takes place on the days specified in the ECB's announcement of the deposit operation.
CHAPTER 2
Additional minimum common features applicable to both repurchase and collateralised loan agreements
Article 172
Date of reverse leg of the transaction
Each NCB shall apply contractual or regulatory arrangements which ensure that the date of the reverse leg of the transaction, including the date of repayment of the collateralised loan agreement, as applicable, is fixed at the time of entering into each transaction.
Article 173
Business days
Each NCB shall apply contractual or regulatory arrangements which define ‘business day’, as referred to in Article 2.
Article 174
Interest rates
Article 175
Mechanisms for converting non-euro amounts
Each NCB shall apply contractual or regulatory arrangements which ensure that the mechanisms for converting non-euro amounts into euro specify that the rate to be used is the ECB daily euro foreign exchange reference rate or, if unavailable, the spot rate of exchange indicated by the ECB on the business day before the day on which the conversion is to be made for the sale by it of euro against a purchase by it of the other currency.
CHAPTER 3
Additional minimum common features exclusive to repurchase agreements
Article 176
Subject matter of repurchase agreements
If the assets in respect of which the comparison under paragraph 2 is made have been converted or redenominated or a call has been made thereon, the definition of equivalence shall be modified to mean:
in the case of conversion, those into which the assets have converted;
in the case of a call being made on assets, equivalent assets to the paid-up assets, provided that the seller has paid to the buyer a sum equal to the value of the call;
in the case of redenominated assets, equivalent assets to those into which the original assets have been redenominated with, as necessary, a sum of money equal to any difference in value between the assets before and after their redenomination.
Article 177
Close-out netting arrangements with respect to repurchase agreements
Each NCB shall apply contractual or regulatory arrangements which contain provisions in relation to netting that are aimed at achieving economic effects equivalent to those set out below.
Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the repurchase date for each transaction shall be deemed to occur immediately and be subject to either of the following options:
any equivalent margin assets shall be immediately deliverable, so that performance of respective obligations of the parties with regard to the delivery of assets and the payment of the repurchase price for any repurchased assets shall be effected only in accordance with points (b) to (d); or
the repurchase transaction will be terminated.
The default market values of the repurchased assets and any equivalent margin assets to be transferred and the repurchase price to be paid by each party shall be established by the NCB for all transactions as at the repurchase date in a commercially reasonable manner.
On the basis of point (b), the NCB shall calculate what is due from each party to the other at the repurchase date. The sums due from one party must be set off against the sums due from the other and only the net balance is payable by the party having the claim thereby valued at the lower amount.
The net balance shall be due and payable on the next day on which TARGET2 is operational to effect a payment. For the purposes of this calculation, any sums not denominated in euro must be converted into euro on the appropriate date at the rate calculated in accordance with Article 175.
Article 178
Compliance with risk control measures
If the NCBs apply contractual or regulatory arrangements that include any provision for the substitution of collateral, such arrangements shall ensure that compliance with the requisite risk control measures is maintained.
Article 179
Cash margins
If the NCBs apply contractual or regulatory arrangements which include any provision for margins to be paid or returned in cash, such provision shall also stipulate that any further obligation to return or provide margins should first be satisfied by the use of cash up to the same amount, together with any interest applicable to it.
Article 180
Further provisions pertaining to repurchase agreements
Without prejudice to the provisions of this Guideline, each NCB may specify further provisions in its contractual or regulatory arrangements pertaining to repurchase agreements.
CHAPTER 4
Additional minimum common features exclusive to collateralised loan arrangements
Article 181
Provision and realisation of collateral
Article 182
Overnight extension of intraday operations
Each NCB shall apply contractual or regulatory arrangements that allow for the possibility of operations which are entered into on an intraday basis to be extended overnight.
CHAPTER 5
Additional minimum common features exclusive to foreign exchange swaps for monetary policy purposes
Article 183
Simultaneous spot-and-forward sale and purchase agreement
Each NCB shall apply contractual or regulatory arrangements which ensure that each transaction is constituted as a simultaneous spot and forward sale and purchase of euro against one foreign currency.
Article 184
Timing and mechanics of transfer of payments
Each NCB shall apply contractual or regulatory arrangements which include a provision as to the timing and mechanics of the transfer of payments. The date of the forward sale and purchase shall be fixed at the time of entering into each transaction.
Article 185
Definition of specific terms
Each NCB shall apply contractual or regulatory arrangements which define the foreign currency, spot rate, forward rate, transfer date and retransfer date in accordance with the following:
‘foreign currency’ means any lawful currency other than the euro;
‘spot rate’ means, in relation to a specific transaction, the rate (as calculated in accordance with Article 175 applied to convert the euro amount into such amount in the foreign currency relevant for that transaction as one party shall be obliged to transfer to the other at the transfer date against payment of the euro amount and which rate shall be set out in the confirmation;
‘forward rate’ means the rate calculated in accordance with Article 175 and applied to convert the euro amount into such amount in the foreign currency as one party shall be obliged to transfer to the other at the retransfer date against payment of the euro amount, which rate shall be as set out in the confirmation and defined in the relevant contractual or regulatory arrangements applied by the relevant NCB;
‘retransfer foreign currency amount’ means such amount of foreign currency as is required to purchase the euro amount as at the retransfer date;
‘transfer date’ means, with regard to any transaction, the date and, where appropriate, the time on that date when the transfer of the euro amount by one party to the other is to become effective, i.e. the date and, where appropriate, the time on that date, when the parties have agreed that settlement of a transfer of the euro amount will occur;
‘retransfer date’ means, with regard to any transaction, the date and, where appropriate, the time on that date, when one party is required to retransfer the euro amount to the other.
Article 186
Close-out netting arrangements with respect to foreign exchange swaps
Each NCB shall apply contractual or regulatory arrangements which contain provisions in relation to netting that are aimed at achieving economic effects equivalent to those set out below.
If an event of default has occurred, each transaction shall be deemed to have been terminated and the replacement values of the euro and the retransfer foreign currency amounts shall be established by the NCB on the basis that such replacement values are the amounts that would be necessary to preserve the economic equivalent of any payments that would otherwise have been required for the NCB.
On the basis of the sums so established, the NCB shall calculate what is due from each party to the other at the retransfer date. The sums due by one party must be converted into euro where necessary in accordance with Article 175 and set off against the sums due by the other. Only the net balance shall be payable by the party having the claim thereby valued at the lower amount. Such net balance is due and payable on the next day on which TARGET2 is operational to effect such a payment.
Article 187
Further provisions relating to foreign exchange swaps
Without prejudice to the requirements laid down in this Guideline, each NCB may specify further provisions in relation to the conduct of foreign exchange swaps in its contractual or regulatory arrangements.
PART EIGHT
FINAL PROVISIONS
Article 188
Sharing of information
The NCBs may, if necessary for the implementation of monetary policy, share with each other individual information, such as operational data, relating to counterparties participating in Eurosystem monetary policy operations. Such information shall be subject to the requirement concerning professional secrecy in Article 37 of the Statute of the ESCB.
Article 189
Anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing legislation
Counterparties to Eurosystem monetary policy operations shall be aware of, and comply with, all obligations imposed on them by anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing legislation.
Article 190
Repeal
Article 191
Taking effect, application and implementation
Article 192
Addressees
This Guideline is addressed to all Eurosystem central banks.
ANNEX I
MINIMUM RESERVES
The content of this Annex is for information purposes only. In the event of conflict between this Annex and the legal framework for the Eurosystem's minimum reserve system as described in paragraph 1, the latter prevails.
Pursuant to Article 19 of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the European Central Bank (hereinafter the ‘Statue of the ESCB’), the European Central Bank (ECB) requires credit institutions to hold minimum reserves on accounts with national central banks (NCBs) within the framework of the Eurosystem's minimum reserve system. The legal framework for this system is laid down in Article 19 of the Statute of the ESCB, Regulation (EC) No 2531/98 and Regulation (EC) No 1745/2003 (ECB/2003/9). The application of Regulation (EC) No 1745/2003 (ECB/2003/9) ensures that the terms and conditions of the Eurosystem's minimum reserve system are uniform throughout Member States whose currency is the euro.
The Eurosystem's minimum reserves system primarily pursues the aims of stabilising money market interest rates and creating (or enlarging) a structural liquidity shortage.
In accordance with Article 2(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1745/2003 (ECB/2003/9), the Eurosystem's minimum reserve system applies to credit institutions established in Member States whose currency is the euro. In addition, branches in the euro area of credit institutions not incorporated in the euro area are also subject to the Eurosystem's minimum reserve system. However, branches established outside the euro area of credit institutions incorporated in the euro area are not subject to this system.
Pursuant to Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1745/2003 (ECB/2003/9), institutions will be automatically exempt from reserve requirements from the start of the maintenance period within which their authorisation is withdrawn or surrendered, or within which a decision to submit the institution to winding-up proceedings is taken by a judicial authority or any other competent authority of a Member State.
Pursuant to Article 2(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1745/2003 (ECB/2003/9), the ECB may exempt, on a non-discriminatory basis, the institutions listed in points (a) to (c) thereof from reserve requirements. ►M9 Such institutions include, inter alia, institutions subject to reorganisation measures and institutions subject to the freezing of funds and/or other measures imposed by the Union under Article 75 of the Treaty or by a Member State restricting the use of their funds or a decision of the Eurosystem suspending or excluding their access to open market operations or the Eurosystem’s standing facilities. ◄
Pursuant to Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1745/2003 (ECB/2003/9), the ECB establishes and maintains a list of institutions subject to the Eurosystem's minimum reserve system.
The ECB also publishes a list of any institutions exempt from their obligations under this system for reasons other than their being subject to reorganisation measures or the freezing of funds and/or other measures imposed by the Union under Article 75 of the Treaty or by a Member State restricting the use of their funds or in respect of which the ECB's Governing Council issued a decision suspending or excluding their access to open market operations or the Eurosystem's standing facilities.
The reserve base of each institution is determined in relation to elements of its balance sheet. The balance sheet data are reported to the NCBs within the general framework of the ECB's monetary and financial statistics. Institutions calculate the reserve base in respect of a particular maintenance period on the basis of the data relating to the month that is two months prior to the month within which the maintenance period starts pursuant to Article 3(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1745/2003 (ECB/2003/9), subject to the exceptions for tail institutions, as laid down in Article 3(4) of the same Regulation.
The reserve ratios are determined by the ECB subject to the maximum limit specified in Regulation (EC) No 2531/98.
The amount of minimum reserves to be held by each institution in respect of a particular maintenance period are calculated by applying the reserve ratios to each relevant item of the reserve base for that period. The minimum reserves identified by the relevant participating NCB and by the institution in accordance with the procedures mentioned in Article 5 of Regulation (EC) No 1745/2003 (ECB/2003/9) constitute the basis for: (a) remuneration of holdings of required reserves; and (b) assessment of an institution's compliance with the obligation to hold the required amount of minimum reserves.
In order to pursue the aim of stabilising interest rates, the Eurosystem's minimum reserve system enables institutions to make use of averaging provisions, implying that compliance with reserve requirements is determined on the basis of the average of the end-of-calendar-day balances on the counterparties' reserve accounts over a maintenance period. Compliance with the reserve requirement is determined on the basis of an institution's average daily reserve holdings over the maintenance period. The maintenance period is defined in Article 7 of Regulation (EC) No 1745/2003 (ECB/2003/9).
In accordance with Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1745/2003 (ECB/2003/9), institutions' holdings of required reserves are remunerated at the average, over the maintenance period, of the ECB's rate (weighted according to the number of calendar days) on the main refinancing operations according to the following formula (whereby the result is rounded to the nearest cent):
Where:
Rt |
= |
remuneration to be paid on holdings of required reserves for the maintenance period t; |
Ht |
= |
average daily holdings of required reserves for the maintenance period t; |
nt |
= |
number of calendar days in the maintenance period t; |
rt |
= |
rate of remuneration on holdings of required reserves for the maintenance period t. Standard rounding of the rate of remuneration to two decimals shall be applied; |
i |
= |
ith calendar day of the maintenance period t; |
MR i |
= |
marginal interest rate for the most recent main refinancing operation settled on or before calendar day i. |
Where an institution fails to comply with other obligations under ECB regulations and decisions relating to the Eurosystem's minimum reserve system (e.g. if relevant data are not transmitted in time or are not accurate), the ECB is empowered to impose sanctions in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 2532/98 and Regulation (EC) No 2157/1999 (ECB/1999/4). The ECB's Executive Board may specify and publish the criteria according to which it will apply the sanctions provided for in Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2531/98.
ANNEX II
ANNOUNCEMENT OF TENDER OPERATIONS
The public tender announcement contains the following indicative information:
the reference number of the tender operation;
the date of the tender operation;
the type of operation (provision or absorption of liquidity, and the type of monetary policy instrument to be used);
the maturity of the operation;
the duration of the operation (normally expressed in a number of days);
the type of auction, i.e. fixed rate or variable rate tender;
for variable rate tenders, the method of allotment, i.e. the single rate auction (Dutch auction) or multiple rate auction (American auction) procedure;
the intended operation volume, normally only in the case of longer-term refinancing operations;
for fixed rate tenders, the fixed tender interest rate, price, swap point or spread (the reference index in the case of indexed tenders and the quotation type in the case of an interest rate or spread);
the minimum or maximum accepted interest rate, price or swap point, if applicable;
the start date and maturity date of the operation, if applicable, or the value date and the maturity date of the instrument, in the case of the issuance of European Central Bank (ECB) debt certificates;
the currencies involved and for foreign exchange swaps, the amount of the currency which is kept fixed;
for foreign exchange swaps, the reference spot exchange rate to be used for the calculation of bids;
the maximum bid limit, if any;
the minimum individual allotment amount, if any;
the minimum allotment ratio, i.e. the lower limit, expressed in percentage terms, of the ratio of bids at the marginal interest rate to be allotted in a tender operation, if any;
the time schedule for the submission of bids;
in the case of the issuance of ECB debt certificates, the denomination of the certificates and the ISIN code of the issue;
the maximum number of bids per counterparty (for variable rate tenders, in the event that the ECB intends to limit the number of bids, this is normally set at ten bids per counterparty);
the quotation type (rate or spread);
the reference entity in the case of indexed tenders.
ANNEX III
ALLOTMENT OF TENDERS AND TENDER PROCEDURES
Table 1
Allotment of fixed rate tenders
The percentage of allotment is:
The amount allotted to the ith counterparty is:
alli = all % × (ai )
where:
A |
= |
total amount allotted |
n |
= |
total number of counterparties |
ai |
= |
bid amount of the ith counterparty |
all % |
= |
percentage of allotment |
alli |
= |
total amount allotted to the ith counterparty |
Table 2
Allotment of variable rate tenders in euro
(the example refers to bids quoted in the form of interest rates)
The percentage of allotment at the marginal interest rate is:
The allotment to the ith counterparty at the marginal interest rate is:
all (rm ) i = all % (rm ) × a(rm)i
The total amount allotted to the ith counterparty is:
where:
A |
= |
total amount allotted |
r s |
= |
sth interest rate bid by the counterparties |
N |
= |
total number of counterparties |
a(r s ) i |
= |
amount bid at the sth interest rate (r s ) by the ith counterparty |
a(r s ) |
= |
total amount bid at the sth interest rate (rs)
|
r m |
= |
marginal interest rate:
r
1 ≥ rs
≥ rm
for a liquidity-providing tender
rm
≥ rs
≥ r
1 for a liquidity-absorbing tender
|
r m – 1 |
= |
interest rate before the marginal interest rate (last interest rate at which bids are completely satisfied):
rm – 1
> rm
for a liquidity-providing tender
rm
> rm – 1
for a liquidity-absorbing tender
|
all %(r m ) |
= |
percentage of allotment at the marginal interest rate |
all(r s ) i |
= |
allotment to the ith counterparty at the sth interest rate |
all i |
= |
total amount allotted to the ith counterparty |
Table 3
Allotment of variable rate foreign exchange swap tenders
The percentage of allotment at the marginal swap point quotation is:
The allotment to the ith counterparty at the marginal swap point quotation is:
all (Δ m ) i = all % (Δ m ) × a(Δm)i
The total amount allotted to the ith counterparty is:
where:
A = |
total amount allotted |
Δ s = |
sth swap point quotation bid by the counterparties |
N = |
total number of counterparties |
a(Δs) i = |
amount bid at the sth swap point quotation (Δs) by the ith counterparty |
a(Δs) = |
total amount bid at the sth swap point quotation (Δs)
|
Δ m = |
marginal swap point quotation: Δ
m
≥ Δ
s
≥ Δ1 for a liquidity-providing foreign exchange swap
Δ1 ≥ Δ
s
≥ Δ
m
for a liquidity-absorbing foreign exchange swap
|
Δ m – 1 |
swap point quotation before the marginal swap point quotation (last swap point quotation at which bids are completely satisfied): Δ
m
> Δ
m – 1
for a liquidity-providing foreign exchange swap
Δ
m – 1
> Δ
m
for a liquidity-absorbing foreign exchange swap
|
all %(Δ m ) |
percentage of allotment at the marginal swap point quotation |
all(Δ s ) i |
allotment to the ith counterparty at the sth swap point quotation |
all i |
total amount allotted to the ith counterparty |
ANNEX IV
ANNOUNCEMENT OF TENDER RESULTS
The public tender result message contains the following indicative information:
the reference number of the tender operation;
the date of the tender operation;
the type of operation;
the maturity of the operation;
the duration of the operation (normally expressed in a number of days);
the total amount bid by Eurosystem counterparties;
the number of bidders;
for foreign exchange swaps, the currencies involved;
the total amount allotted;
for fixed rate tenders, the percentage of allotment;
for foreign exchange swaps, the spot exchange rate;
for variable rate tenders, the marginal interest rate, price, swap point or spread accepted and the percentage of allotment at the marginal interest rate, price or swap point;
for multiple rate auctions, the minimum bid rate and the maximum bid rate, i.e. the lower and upper limit to the interest rate at which counterparties submitted their bids in variable rate tenders, and the weighted average allotment rate;
the start date and the maturity date of the operation, if applicable, or the value date and the maturity date of the instrument, in the case of the issuance of European Central Bank (ECB) debt certificates;
the minimum individual allotment amount, if any;
the minimum allotment ratio, if any;
in the case of the issuance of ECB debt certificates, the denomination of the certificates and the ISIN code of the issue;
the maximum number of bids per counterparty (for variable rate tenders, in the event that the ECB intends to limit the number of bids, this is normally set at ten bids per counterparty).
ANNEX V
CRITERIA FOR THE SELECTION OF COUNTERPARTIES TO PARTICIPATE IN FOREIGN EXCHANGE INTERVENTION OPERATIONS
1. The selection of counterparties for Eurosystem foreign exchange intervention operations is based on two sets of criteria relating to the principles of prudence and efficiency.
2. The criteria relating to efficiency are only applied once the criteria relating to the principle of prudence have been applied.
3. The criteria relating to the principle of prudence comprise the following:
creditworthiness of the counterparty, which is assessed using a combination of different methods, e.g. using credit ratings available from commercial agencies and the in-house analysis of capital and other business ratios;
a counterparty is supervised by a recognised supervisor;
a counterparty has a good reputation and observes high ethical standards.
4. The criteria relating to the principle of efficiency comprise, inter alia, the following:
a counterparty's competitive pricing behaviour and its ability to conduct large-volume foreign exchange operations efficiently under all market conditions; and
the quality and coverage of information provided by the counterparty.
5. In order to be able to intervene efficiently in different geographical locations, the national central banks may select counterparties for their foreign exchange intervention operations in any international financial centre.
ANNEX VI
CROSS-BORDER USE OF ELIGIBLE ASSETS
I. THE CORRESPONDENT CENTRAL BANKING MODEL (CCBM)
Table 1
The correspondent central banking model (CCBM)
Use of eligible assets deposited in country B by a counterparty established in country A in order to obtain credit from the national central bank (NCB) of country A
1. All NCBs maintain securities accounts with each other for the cross-border use of eligible assets. The precise procedure of the CCBM depends on whether the eligible assets are earmarked for each individual transaction or whether they are held in a pool of underlying assets.
2. In an earmarking system, as soon as a counterparty's bid for credit is accepted by its home NCB the counterparty instructs, via its own custodian if necessary, the securities settlement systems (SSS) in the country in which its marketable assets are held, to transfer them to the central bank of that country (hereinafter the ‘correspondent central bank’) for the account of the home NCB. Once the home NCB has been informed by the correspondent central bank that the collateral has been received, it transfers the funds to the counterparty. The NCBs do not advance funds until they are certain that the counterparties' marketable assets have been received by the correspondent central bank. Where necessary to meet settlement deadlines, counterparties may be able to pre-deposit assets with correspondent central banks for the account of their home NCB using the CCBM procedures.
3. In a pooling system, the counterparty may at any time provide the correspondent central bank with marketable assets for the account of the home NCB. Once the home NCB has been informed by the correspondent central bank that the marketable assets have been received, it will add these marketable assets to the pool account of the counterparty.
4. Specific procedures for cross-border use have been developed for certain non-marketable assets, i.e. credit claims and retail mortgage-backed debt instruments (RMBDs). When credit claims are used as collateral in a cross-border context, a CCBM variant is applied to credit claims, using a transfer of ownership, an assignment or a pledge in favour of the home NCB, or a charge in favour of the correspondent central bank, acting as the agent for the home NCB. A further ad-hoc variant based on the charge in favour of the correspondent central bank acting as the agent for the home NCB is applied to allow the cross-border use of RMBDs.
5. The CCBM is available to counterparties, both for marketable and non-marketable assets, as a minimum from 9 a.m. to 4 p.m. CET on each TARGET2 business day. A counterparty wishing to make use of the CCBM must advise the NCB from which it wishes to receive credit, i.e. its home NCB, before 4 p.m. CET. The counterparty must ensure that the collateral for securing the credit operation is delivered to the account of the correspondent central bank by 4.45 p.m. CET at the latest. Instructions or deliveries that do not respect this deadline will only be dealt with on a best effort basis and may be considered for credit that will be given on the following TARGET2 business day. When counterparties foresee a need to use the CCBM late in the day, they should, where possible, pre-deposit the assets. Under exceptional circumstances or when required for monetary policy purposes, the ECB may decide to extend the CCBM's closing time until the TARGET2 closing time, in cooperation with central securities depositories regarding their availability to extend their cut-off times for marketable assets.
II. ELIGIBLE LINKS BETWEEN SSSS
Table 2
Eligible links between securities settlement systems
Use of eligible assets issued in the SSS of country B held by a counterparty established in country A through an eligible link between the SSSs in countries A and B in order to obtain credit from the NCB of country A.
1. Eligible links between two SSSs in the European Economic Area (EEA) consist of a set of procedures and arrangements for the cross-border transfer of securities through a book-entry process. They take the form of an omnibus account opened by an SSS (hereinafter the ‘investor SSS’) in another SSS (hereinafter the ‘issuer SSS’).
2. Eligible links allow a participant in one SSS in the EEA to hold securities issued in another SSS in the EEA without being a participant therein. When using links between SSSs, the counterparties hold the assets on their own account with their home SSS and have no need for a custodian.
III. CCBM IN COMBINATION WITH ELIGIBLE LINKS
Table 3
CCBM in combination with eligible links
Use of eligible assets issued in the SSS of country C and held in the SSS of country B by a counterparty established in country A through an eligible link between the SSSs in countries B and C in order to obtain credit from the NCB of country A.
Where eligible assets in the form of securities are to be transferred via the CCBM with links, counterparties must ensure that the securities are delivered to an account at the relevant investor SSS by 4 p.m. CET on the settlement date in order to ensure settlement of same-day value operations. Any request for mobilisation received by home NCBs from their counterparties after 4 p.m. CET, or any request for the delivery of eligible assets to an account at the relevant investor SSS after 4 p.m. CET, is dealt with on a best efforts basis, according to the cut-off times of the SSSs involved.
IV. CCBM WITH TRI-PARTY COLLATERAL MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Table 4
Cross-border tri-party services
Use of eligible assets held in the tri-party agent (TPA) of country B by a counterparty established in country A in order to obtain credit from the NCB of country A.
The arrow ‘Information on collateral’ between counterparty A and NCB A may not be relevant in the case of certain TPAs, depending on the contractual model chosen, and in such cases the counterparty does not send an instruction to NCB A or receive a confirmation from NCB A.
ANNEX VIa
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR THE USE OF SECURITIES SETTLEMENT SYSTEMS AND LINKS BETWEEN SECURITIES SETTLEMENT SYSTEMS IN EUROSYSTEM CREDIT OPERATIONS
I. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SECURITIES SETTLEMENT SYSTEMS (SSSS) AND LINKS BETWEEN SSSS
The Eurosystem determines the eligibility of an SSS operated by a central securities depository (CSD) established in a Member State whose currency is the euro or a national central bank (NCB) or a public body as specified in Article 1(4) of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 20 ) of a Member State whose currency is the euro (hereinafter an ‘SSS operator’ or an ‘operator of an SSS’) on the basis of the following criteria:
the euro area SSS operator complies with the requirements for authorisation as a CSD laid down in Regulation (EU) No 909/2014; and
the NCB of the Member State in which the respective SSS operates has set up and maintains appropriate contractual or other arrangements with the euro area SSS operator, which include the Eurosystem requirements laid down in Section II.
If the authorisation procedure laid down in Title III of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 in respect of a euro area CSD has not been completed, points (a) and (b) do not apply. In this situation, the SSS operated by this CSD must instead be positively assessed under the ‘Framework for the assessment of securities settlement systems and links to determine their eligibility for use in Eurosystem credit operations’, January 2014, which is published on the ECB's website.
The Eurosystem determines the eligibility of a direct link or a relayed link on the basis of the following criteria:
the direct link or, in the case of a relayed link, each of the underlying direct links, complies with the requirements laid down in Regulation (EU) No 909/2014;
the NCBs of the Member States in which the investor SSS, any intermediary SSS and the issuer SSS are established have set up and maintain appropriate contractual or other arrangements with the euro area SSS operators, which include the Eurosystem requirements laid down in Section II;
the investor SSS, any intermediary SSS and the issuer SSS involved in the link are all considered eligible by the Eurosystem.
If the authorisation procedure laid down in Title III of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 in respect of any CSD operating an SSS involved in a link has not been completed, points (a) to (c) do not apply. In this situation, links involving an SSS operated by such a CSD must instead be positively assessed under the ‘Framework for the assessment of securities settlement systems and links to determine their eligibility for use in Eurosystem credit operations’, January 2014.
Before determining the eligibility of a direct link or relayed link involving one or more SSSs operated by CSDs established in a European Economic Area (EEA) State whose currency is not the euro or NCBs or public bodies of an EEA State whose currency is not the euro (hereinafter a ‘non-euro area EEA SSS’ operated by a ‘non-euro area EEA SSS operator’), the Eurosystem carries out a business case analysis which takes into account, inter alia, the value of the eligible assets issued by or held in those SSSs.
Subject to the business case analysis having a positive outcome, the Eurosystem determines the eligibility of a link involving non-euro area EEA SSSs on the basis of the following criteria.
The non-euro area EEA operators of the SSSs involved in the link and the link itself comply with the requirements laid down in Regulation (EU) No 909/2014.
For direct links, the NCB of the Member State in which the investor SSS operates has set up and maintains appropriate contractual or other arrangements with the euro area operator of the investor SSS. These contractual or other arrangements must stipulate the obligation of the euro area SSS operator to implement the provisions laid down in Section II in its legal arrangements with the non-euro area EEA operator of the issuer SSS.
For relayed links, each of the underlying direct links in which a non-euro area EEA SSS acts as issuer SSS must fulfil the criterion in the first paragraph of point (b). In a relayed link where both the intermediary SSS and the issuer SSS are non-euro area EEA SSSs, the NCB of the Member State in which the investor SSS operates must set up and maintain appropriate contractual or other arrangements with the euro area operator of the investor SSS. These contractual or other arrangements must stipulate not only the obligation of the euro area SSS operator to implement the provisions laid down in Section II in its legal arrangements with the non-euro area EEA operator of the intermediary SSS, but also the obligation of the non-euro area EEA operator of the intermediary SSS to implement the legal provisions laid down in Section II in its contractual or other arrangements with the non-euro area EEA operator of the issuer SSS.
All euro area SSSs involved in the link are considered eligible by the Eurosystem.
The NCB of the non-euro area EEA State in which the investor SSS operates has committed to reporting information on the eligible assets traded on domestic acceptable markets in a manner determined by the Eurosystem.
If the authorisation procedure laid down in Title III of Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 in respect of any CSD operating the investor SSS, intermediary SSS or issuer SSS involved in a link has not been completed, points (a) to (d) do not apply. In this situation, links involving an SSS operated by such a CSD must instead be positively assessed under the ‘Framework for the assessment of securities settlement systems and links to determine their eligibility for use in Eurosystem credit operations’, January 2014.
II. EUROSYSTEM REQUIREMENTS
In order to ensure legal soundness, an SSS operator must satisfy the NCB of the Member State in which the respective SSS operates, by reference to binding legal documentation, whether in the form of a duly executed contract or by reference to the mandatory terms and conditions of the relevant SSS operator or otherwise, that:
the entitlement to securities held in an SSS operated by that SSS operator, including to securities held through the links operated by the SSS operator (held in accounts maintained by the linked SSS operators), is governed by the law of an EEA State;
the entitlement of the participants in the SSS to securities held in that SSS is clear, unambiguous and ensures that the participants in the SSS are not exposed to the insolvency of that SSS operator;
where the SSS acts in the capacity of an issuer SSS, the entitlement of the linked investor SSS to securities held in the issuer SSS is clear, unambiguous and ensures that the investor SSS and its participants are not exposed to the insolvency of the issuer SSS operator;
where the SSS acts in the capacity of an investor SSS, the entitlement of that SSS to the securities held in the linked issuer SSS is clear, unambiguous and ensures that the investor SSS and its participants are not exposed to the insolvency of the issuer SSS operator;
no lien or similar mechanism provided for under applicable law or contractual arrangements will have a negative impact on the NCB's entitlement to the securities held in the SSS;
the procedure for allocating any shortfall of securities held in the SSS, in particular in the event of the insolvency of: (i) the SSS operator; (ii) any third party involved in safekeeping the securities; or (iii) any linked issuer SSS, is clear and unambiguous;
the procedures to be followed in order to claim securities under the legal framework of the SSS are clear and unambiguous, including, where the SSS acts as an investor SSS, any formalities to be fulfilled towards the linked issuer SSS.
An SSS operator must ensure that when the SSS it operates acts as an investor SSS, securities transfers made via links will be final within the meaning of Directive 98/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council ( 21 ), i.e. it is not possible to revoke, unwind, rescind or otherwise undo such securities transfers.
When the SSS that it operates acts as an issuer SSS, an SSS operator must ensure that it does not make use of a third-party institution, such as a bank or any party other than the SSS acting as intermediary between the issuer and the issuer SSS, or the SSS operator must ensure that its SSS has a direct or relayed link with an SSS which has this (unique and direct) relationship.
In order to utilise the links between SSSs used to settle central bank transactions, facilities must be in place to allow either intraday delivery-versus-payment settlement in central bank money or intraday free of payment (FOP) settlement, which may take the form of real-time gross settlement or a series of batch processes with intraday finality. Owing to the settlement features of TARGET2-Securities, this requirement is considered as already fulfilled for direct and relayed links in which all SSSs involved in the link are integrated in TARGET2-Securities.
With regard to operating hours and opening days:
an SSS and its links must provide settlement services on all TARGET2 business days;
an SSS must operate during daytime processing as referred to in Appendix V of Annex II to Guideline ECB/2012/27 ( 22 );
SSSs involved in direct links or relayed links must enable their participants to submit instructions for same-day delivery-versus-payment settlement via the issuer and/or the intermediary SSS (as applicable) to the investor SSS until at least 3.30 p.m. Central European Time (CET) ( 23 );
SSSs involved in direct links or relayed links must enable their participants to submit instructions for same-day FOP settlement via the issuer or intermediary SSS (as applicable) to the investor SSS until at least 4 p.m. CET;
SSSs must have measures in place to ensure that the operating times specified in points (b) to (d) above are extended in the event of emergency.
Owing to the settlement features of TARGET2-Securities, these requirements are considered as already fulfilled for SSSs integrated in TARGET-2 Securities, and for direct and relayed links in which all SSSs involved in the link are integrated in TARGET2-Securities.
III. APPLICATION PROCEDURE
Euro area SSS operators that intend for their services to be used in Eurosystem credit operations should submit an application for an assessment of eligibility to the NCB of the Member State in which the SSS is established.
For links, including those involving a non-euro area EEA SSS, the operator of the investor SSS should submit the application for an assessment of eligibility to the NCB of the Member State in which the investor SSS operates.
The Eurosystem may reject an application or, where the SSS or link is already eligible, it may suspend or withdraw eligibility if:
one or more of the eligibility criteria provided for in Section I are not met;
the use of the SSS or link could affect the safety and efficiency of Eurosystem credit operations and expose the Eurosystem to the risk of financial losses, or is otherwise deemed, on the grounds of prudence, to pose a risk.
The Eurosystem decision on the eligibility of an SSS or link is notified to the SSS operator which submitted the application for an assessment of eligibility. The Eurosystem will provide reasons for any negative decision.
The SSS or link may be used for Eurosystem credit operations once it has been published in the Eurosystem lists of eligible SSSs and eligible links on the ECB's website.
ANNEX VII
CALCULATION OF SANCTIONS TO BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART FIVE AND FINANCIAL PENALTIES TO BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART SEVEN
I. CALCULATION OF FINANCIAL PENALTIES TO BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART FIVE
1. Where a financial penalty is to be imposed by a national central bank(NCB) on any of its counterparties in accordance with Part Five, the NCB shall calculate the penalty in accordance with a pre-specified penalty rate, as follows.
For failure to comply with an obligation referred to in Article 154(1)(a), (b) or (c) a financial penalty is calculated using the marginal lending facility rate that applied on the day when the non-compliance began plus 2,5 percentage points.
For failure to comply with an obligation referred to in Article 154(1)(d) or (e), a financial penalty is calculated using the marginal lending facility rate that applied on the day when the non-compliance began plus 5 percentage points. For repeated infringements of the obligation referred to in Article 154(1)(d) or of the obligation referred to in Article 154(1)(e) within a 12-month period, starting from the day of the first infringement, the penalty rate increases by a further 2,5 percentage points for each infringement.
2. For failure to comply with an obligation referred to in Article 154(1)(a) or (b), a financial penalty is calculated by applying the penalty rate, in accordance with paragraph 1(a), to the amount of collateral or cash that the counterparty could not deliver or settle, multiplied by the coefficient X/360, where X is the number of calendar days, with a maximum of seven, during which the counterparty was unable to collateralise or settle: (a) the allotted amount as specified in the certification of individual tender allotment results during the maturity of an operation; or (b) the remaining amount of a particular operation if there are early terminations executed by the NCB over the remainder of the term of the operation.
3. For failure to comply with an obligation referred to in Article 154(1)(c), a financial penalty is calculated by applying the penalty rate, in accordance with paragraph 1(a), to the value of the ineligible assets or the assets that may not be mobilised or used by the counterparty after haircuts, as follows:
in the case of ineligible assets which are provided by the counterparty to an NCB, the value of the ineligible assets after haircuts are taken into account; or
in the case of assets which were originally eligible but became ineligible or may no longer be mobilised or used by the counterparty, the value after haircuts of the assets that have not been removed by or before the start of the eighth calendar day, following an event after which the eligible assets became ineligible or may no longer be mobilised or used by the counterparty, are taken into account.
4. The amounts referred to in paragraph 3(a) and (b) are multiplied by the coefficient X/360, where X is the number of calendar days, with a maximum of seven, during which the counterparty failed to comply with its obligations in respect of the use of assets submitted as collateral for Eurosystem credit operations. In the case of paragraph 3(b), the calculation of X begins after the expiry of the grace period of seven calendar days.
[EUR [value of ineligible assets after haircuts on the first day of the infringement] * (the applicable marginal lending facility rate on the day when the infringement began + 2,5 %) * [X]/360 = EUR […]]
5. For limit breaches as regards unsecured debt instruments issued by a credit institution or its closely linked entities as laid down in Article 141, the application of a grace period is determined as follows:
A grace period of seven calendar days applies if the breach resulted from a change in the valuation, without a submission of additional such unsecured debt instruments and without removal of assets from the total collateral pool, on the basis of the following:
the value of those already submitted unsecured debt instruments has increased; or
the total value of the collateral pool has decreased.
In such cases the counterparty is required to adjust the value of its total collateral pool and/or the value of such unsecured debt instruments within the grace period, to ensure compliance with the applicable limit.
The submission of additional unsecured debt instruments issued by a credit institution or its closely linked entities breaching the applicable limit does not entitle the counterparty to a grace period.
6. If the counterparty has provided information that affects the value of its collateral negatively from the Eurosystem's perspective with regard to Article 145(4), e.g. incorrect information on the outstanding amount of a used credit claim that is or has been false or out of date, or if the counterparty fails to timely provide information as required under Article 101(a)(iv), the amount (value) of the collateral that has been negatively affected is taken into account for the calculation of the financial penalty under paragraph 3 and no grace period shall be applicable. If the incorrect information is corrected within the applicable notification period, e.g. for credit claims within the course of the next business day pursuant to Article 109(2), no penalty is to be applied.
7. For failure to comply with the obligations referred to in Article 154(1)(d) or (e), a financial penalty is calculated by applying the penalty rate, in accordance with paragraph 1(b), to the amount of the counterparty's unauthorised access to the marginal lending facility or unpaid credit from the Eurosystem.
8. An NCB will impose a minimum financial penalty of EUR 500 where the calculation in accordance with this Annex results in an amount of less than EUR 500. A financial penalty will not be imposed where a breach is rectified within an applicable grace period.
II. CALCULATION OF NON-FINANCIAL PENALTIES TO BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART FIVE
Suspension for non-compliance with obligations referred to in Article 154(1)(a) or (b)
9. Where a suspension period applies in accordance with Article 156(1), an NCB will impose the suspension in accordance with the following:
if the amount of non-delivered collateral or cash is up to 40 % of the total collateral or cash to be delivered, a suspension of one month applies;
if the amount of non-delivered collateral or cash is between 40 % and 80 % of the total collateral or cash to be delivered, a suspension of two months applies;
if the amount of non-delivered collateral or cash is between 80 % and 100 % of the total collateral or cash to be delivered, a suspension of three months applies.
10. With regard to I and II above, if a sanction relates to a transaction between a counterparty and the ECB in a bilateral procedure, the above provisions are interpreted to cater for the imposition of sanctions by the ECB.
III. CALCULATION OF FINANCIAL PENALTIES TO BE APPLIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART SEVEN
NCBs calculate the financial penalty pursuant to Article 166(4a) in accordance with the following:
For failure to comply with an obligation referred to in Article 166(4a), the financial penalty is calculated using the marginal lending facility rate that applied on the day when the non-compliance began plus 2,5 percentage points.
The financial penalty is calculated by applying the penalty rate, in accordance with paragraph (a), to the amount of cash that the counterparty could not reimburse or pay, or to the value of the assets which were not delivered, multiplied by the coefficient X/360, where X is the number of calendar days, with a maximum of seven, during which the counterparty was unable to: (i) reimburse any amount of the credit, pay the repurchase price or the cash otherwise due; or (ii) deliver the assets at maturity or when otherwise due according to the contractual or regulatory arrangements.
The following formula shall be used for the calculation of the financial penalty in accordance with paragraph 1(a) and (b) above:
[EUR [amount of cash that the counterparty could not reimburse or pay, or value of assets that the counterparty could not deliver] * (the applicable marginal lending facility rate on the day when the non-compliance began plus 2,5 percentage points) * [X]/360 (where X is the number of calendar days during which the counterparty did not pay, reimburse or deliver) = EUR […]].
ANNEX VIII
LOAN-LEVEL DATA REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FOR ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES AND THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LOAN-LEVEL DATA REPOSITORIES
This Annex applies to the provision of comprehensive and standardised loan-level data on the pool of cash-flow generating assets backing asset-backed securities (ABSs), as specified in Article 78, and sets out the requirements for loan-level data repositories.
I. SUBMISSION OF LOAN-LEVEL DATA
1. Loan-level data must be submitted by the relevant parties to a loan-level data repository in accordance with this Annex. The loan-level data repository publishes such data electronically.
2. Loan-level data may be submitted for each individual transaction using:
for transactions reported to an ESMA securitisation repository, the relevant templates specified in the implementing technical standards adopted by the Commission under Article 7(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2402; or
for transactions reported to a Eurosystem designated repository, the up-to-date relevant ECB loan-level data reporting template, published on the ECB's website.
In each case, the relevant template to be submitted depends on the type of asset backing the ABS, as defined in Article 73(1).
2a. Submission of loan-level data in accordance with paragraph 2(a) will commence at the beginning of the calendar month immediately following the date which is three months from the ESMA reporting activation date.
Submission of loan-level data in accordance with paragraph 2(b) is permitted until the end of the calendar month in which the date three years and three months from the ESMA reporting activation date falls.
2b. Notwithstanding the second subparagraph of paragraph 2a, loan-level data for an individual transaction must be submitted in accordance with paragraph 2(a) where both:
the relevant parties to a transaction are obliged pursuant to Article 7(1)(a) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 to report loan-level data on the individual transaction to an ESMA securitisation repository using the relevant templates specified in the implementing technical standards adopted by the Commission under Article 7(4) of that Regulation; and
submissions of loan-level data in accordance with paragraph 2(a) have commenced.
3. Loan-level data must be reported at least on a quarterly basis, but no later than one month following a due date for the payment of interest on the relevant ABSs. As regards the data submitted, the pool cut-off date may not be more than two months old, i.e. the ‘date of submission of report’ less the ‘pool cut-off date’ must be less than two months. The ‘pool cut-off date’ is defined as the date on which a snapshot of the performance of the underlying assets was captured for the respective report.
4. To ensure compliance with the requirements in paragraphs 2 and 3, the loan-level data repository conducts automated consistency and accuracy checks on reports of new and updated loan-level data for each transaction.
II. LEVEL OF REQUIRED DETAIL
1. After the date of application of loan-level data reporting requirements for the specific class of cash-flow generating assets backing the ABSs as specified on the European Central Bank's (ECB's) website, detailed loan-by-loan level information must be provided for ABSs to become or remain eligible.
2. The ABSs for which the ECB’s loan-level data reporting template is used must achieve a compulsory minimum compliance level of A1 data score, assessed by reference to the availability of information, in particular the data fields of the loan-level data reporting template, calculated in accordance with the methodology set out in Section III of this Annex. Notwithstanding the required scoring values set out in Section III in respect of loan-level data, the Eurosystem may accept as collateral ABSs for which the ECB’s loan-level data reporting templates are used with a score lower than the required scoring value (A1), on a case-by-case basis and subject to the provision of adequate explanations for the failure to achieve the required score. For each adequate explanation, the Eurosystem will specify a maximum tolerance level and a tolerance horizon, as further specified on the ECB’s website. The tolerance horizon will indicate the time period within which the data quality for the ABSs must improve.
3. To capture non-available fields, a set of six ‘no data’ (ND) options are included in ►M9 the ECB’s loan-level data reporting templates ◄ and must be filled in whenever particular data cannot be submitted in accordance with the loan-level data reporting template.
Table 1
Explanation of the ND options
‘no data’ options |
Explanation |
ND1 |
Data not collected as not required by the underwriting criteria |
ND2 |
Data collected on application but not loaded into the reporting system on completion |
ND3 |
Data collected on application but loaded it on a separate system from the reporting one |
ND4 |
Data collected but will only be available from MM-YYYY |
ND5 |
Not relevant |
ND6 |
Not applicable for the jurisdiction |
III. ►M9 ECB DATA SCORE METHODOLOGY ◄
▼M7 —————
2. The loan-level data repository generates and assigns a score to each ABS transaction upon submission and processing of loan-level data.
3. This score reflects the number of mandatory fields that contain ND1 and the number of mandatory fields that contain ND2, ND3 or ND4, compared in each case against the total number of mandatory fields. In this regard, the options ►M6 ND5 and ND6 ◄ may only be used if the relevant data fields in the relevant loan-level data reporting template so permit. Combining the two threshold references produces the following range of loan-level data scores.
Table 2
Loan-level data scores
Scoring value matrix |
ND1 fields |
||||
0 |
≤ 10 % |
≤ 30 % |
> 30 % |
||
ND2 or ND3 or ND4 |
0 |
A1 |
B1 |
C1 |
D1 |
≤ 20 % |
A2 |
B2 |
C2 |
D2 |
|
≤ 40 % |
A3 |
B3 |
C3 |
D3 |
|
> 40 % |
A4 |
B4 |
C4 |
D4 |
▼M7 —————
IV. ►M9 EUROSYSTEM DESIGNATION OF LOAN-LEVEL DATA REPOSITORIES ◄
I. Requirements for designation
In order to be designated by the Eurosystem, loan-level data repositories must comply with the applicable Eurosystem requirements, including open access, non-discrimination, coverage, appropriate governance structure and transparency.
In relation to the requirements of open access and non-discrimination, a loan-level data repository:
may not unfairly discriminate between data users when providing access to loan-level data;
must apply criteria for access to loan-level data which are objective, non-discriminatory and publicly available;
may only restrict access to the least possible extent so as to meet the requirement of proportionality;
must establish fair procedures for instances where it denies access to data users or data providers;
must have the necessary technical capabilities to provide access to both data users and data providers in all reasonable circumstances, including data backup procedures, data security safeguards, and disaster recovery arrangements;
may not impose costs for data users for the supply or extraction of loan-level data which are discriminatory or give rise to undue restrictions on access to loan-level data.
In relation to the requirement of coverage, a loan-level data repository:
must establish and maintain robust technology systems and operational controls to enable it to process loan-level data in a manner that supports the Eurosystem's requirements for submission of and access to loan-level data in relation to eligible assets subject to loan-level data disclosure requirements, as specified both in Article 78 and in this Annex.
In particular, the loan-level data repository's technology system must allow data users to extract loan-level data, loan-level data scores and the timestamp of data submissions, through both manual and automatic processes that cover all loan-level data submissions of all ABS transactions which have been submitted through that loan-level data repository and an extraction of multiple loan-level data files if required in one download request;
must credibly demonstrate to the Eurosystem that its technical and operational capacity would permit it to achieve substantial coverage should it obtain designated loan-level data repository status.
In relation to the requirements of an appropriate governance structure and transparency, a loan-level data repository:
must establish governance arrangements that serve the interests of stakeholders in the ABS market in fostering transparency;
must establish clearly documented governance arrangements, respect appropriate governance standards and ensure the maintenance and operation of an adequate organisational structure to ensure continuity and orderly functioning; and
must grant the Eurosystem sufficient access to documents and supporting information in order to monitor, on an ongoing basis, the continued appropriateness of the loan-level data repository's governance structure.
II. Procedures for designation and withdrawal of designation
An application for designation by the Eurosystem as a loan-level data repository must be submitted to the ECB's Directorate Risk Management. The application must provide appropriate reasoning and complete supporting documentation demonstrating the applicant's compliance with the requirements for loan-level data repositories set out in this Guideline. The application, reasoning and supporting documentation must be provided in writing and, wherever possible, in electronic format. No application for designation will be accepted after 13 May 2019. Any application received prior to that date will be processed in accordance with this Annex.
Within 25 working days of receipt of the application, the ECB will assess whether the application is complete. If the application is not complete, the ECB will set a deadline by which the loan-level data repository is to provide additional information.
After assessing an application as complete, the ECB will notify the loan-level data repository accordingly.
The Eurosystem will, within a reasonable time frame (aiming for 60 working days of the notification referred to in paragraph 3), examine an application for designation made by a loan-level data repository based on the compliance of the loan-level data repository with the requirements set out in this Guideline. As part of its examination, the Eurosystem may require the loan-level data repository to conduct one or more live interactive demonstrations with Eurosystem staff, to illustrate the loan-level data repository's technical capabilities in relation to the requirements set out in Section IV.I, paragraphs 2 and 3 of this Annex. If such a demonstration is required, it shall be considered a mandatory requirement of the application process. The demonstration may also include the use of test files.
The Eurosystem may extend the period of examination by 20 working days, in cases where additional clarification is deemed necessary by the Eurosystem or where a demonstration has been required in accordance with paragraph 4.
The Eurosystem will aim to adopt a reasoned decision to designate or to refuse designation within 60 working days of the notification referred to in paragraph 3, or within 80 working days thereof where paragraph 5 applies.
Within five working days of the adoption of a decision under paragraph 6, the Eurosystem will notify its decision to the loan-level data repository concerned. Where the Eurosystem refuses to designate the loan-level data repository or withdraws the designation of the loan-level data repository, it will provide reasons for its decision in the notification.
The decision adopted by the Eurosystem pursuant to paragraph 6 will take effect on the fifth working day following its notification pursuant to paragraph 7.
A designated loan-level data repository must, without undue delay, notify the Eurosystem of any material changes to its compliance with the requirements for designation.
The Eurosystem will withdraw the designation of a loan-level data repository where the loan-level data repository:
obtained the designation by making false statements or by any other irregular means; or
no longer fulfils the requirements under which it was designated.
A decision to withdraw the designation of a loan-level data repository will take effect immediately. ABSs in relation to which loan-level data was made available through a loan-level data repository whose designation was withdrawn in accordance with paragraph 10 may remain eligible as collateral for Eurosystem credit operations, providing all other requirements are fulfilled, for a period
until the next required loan-level data reporting date specified in Section I.4 of Annex VIII; or
if the period permitted under (a) is technically infeasible for the party submitting loan-level data and a written explanation has been provided to the NCB assessing eligibility by the next required loan-level data reporting date specified in Section I.4 of Annex VIII, three months following the decision under paragraph 10.
After the expiry of this period the loan-level data for such ABSs must be made available through a designated loan-level data repository in accordance with all applicable Eurosystem requirements.
The Eurosystem will publish on the ECB's website a list of loan-level data repositories designated in accordance with this Guideline. That list will be updated within five working days following the adoption of a decision under paragraph 6 or paragraph 10.
IIa. Minimum information required for an application for designation to be deemed complete
As regards the Eurosystem requirements of open access, non-discrimination, and transparency, applicants must provide information on the following:
detailed access criteria and any access restrictions to loan-level data for data users, and details of and reasons for any variations in such access criteria and access restrictions for data users;
policy statements or other written description of the process and criteria applied for granting a data user access to a specific loan-level data file, as well as further details, whether in such policy statements or other written description, of any technical or procedural safeguards that exist to ensure non-discrimination.
As regards the Eurosystem requirement of coverage, applicants must provide information on the following.
The number of staff employed by the applicant in the area of loan-level data repository services, the technical background of the staff employed in and/or other resources dedicated to this area, and how the applicant manages and retains the technical know-how of such staff and/or other resources to ensure technical and operational continuity on a daily basis despite any changes to staff or resources.
Up-to-date coverage statistics, including how many outstanding ABSs eligible for Eurosystem collateral operations are currently hosted by the applicant, including a breakdown of such ABSs based on geographical location of the debtors of the cash-flow generating assets and the type of cash-flow generating asset classes specified in Article 73(1). In the event that any asset class is not currently hosted by the applicant, information must be provided on the applicant's plans and the technical feasibility to cover such asset class in the future.
The technical operation of the applicant's loan-level data repository system, including a written description of:
the user guide to its user interface, explaining how to access, extract and submit loan-level data, from both a data user perspective and a data provider perspective;
the current technical and operational capacity of the applicant's repository system, such as how many ABS transactions can be stored in the system (and whether the system can easily be upscaled), how loan-level data regarding historical ABS transactions are stored and accessed by data users and data providers and any maximum limits for the number of loans that can be uploaded by a data provider in one ABS transaction;
the applicant's current technical and operational capabilities regarding the submission of data by data providers, i.e. the technical process by which the data provider can submit loan-level data and whether this is a manual or automatic process; and
the applicant's current technical and operational capabilities regarding the extraction of data by data users, i.e. the technical process by which the data user can extract loan-level data, whether this is a manual or automatic process.
A technical description of:
the file formats submitted by data providers and accepted by the applicant for the submission of loan-level data (Excel template file, XML schemas, etc.), including an electronic soft copy of each such file format, and an indication of whether the applicant provides tools for data providers to convert loan-level data into the file formats accepted by the applicant;
the applicant's current technical and operational capabilities regarding the testing and validation documentation for the applicant's system, including the calculation of the loan-level data compliance score;
the frequency of updates and new releases of its system, and the maintenance policy and testing policy;
the applicant's technical and operational capabilities to adapt to future Eurosystem loan-level data template updates, such as changes in current fields, and the addition or deletion of fields;
the applicant's technical capabilities regarding disaster recovery and business continuity, specifically with regard to the degree of redundancy of individual storage and backup solutions in its data centre and server architecture;
a description of the applicant's current technical capabilities regarding its internal control architecture in relation to loan-level data, including information system controls and data integrity.
As regards the Eurosystem requirement of an appropriate governance structure, applicants must provide the following:
details of its corporate status, i.e. its statute or articles of association, and its shareholder structure;
information on the applicant's internal audit procedures (if any), including the identity of those responsible for conducting such audits, whether audits are externally verified and, if audits are conducted internally, what arrangements are taken to prevent or manage any conflicts of interest;
information on how the applicant's governance arrangements serve the interests of ABS market stakeholders, in particular whether its pricing policy is considered in the context of this requirement;
written confirmation that the Eurosystem will have access, on an ongoing basis, to the documentation necessary for it to monitor the continued appropriateness of the applicant's governance structure and compliance with the governance requirements in paragraph 4 of Section IV.I.
The applicant must provide a description of the following:
how the applicant calculates the data quality score, and how the score is published in the applicant's repository system and thereby made available to data users;
the data quality checks carried out by the applicant, including the process, the number of checks and the list of fields checked;
the applicant's current capabilities regarding the reporting of consistency and accuracy checks, i.e. how existing reports are produced by the applicant for data providers and data users, the ability of the applicant's platform to build automated and custom reports according to data users' requests, and the ability of the applicant's platform to automatically send notifications to data users and data providers (for example, notifications of loan-level data having been uploaded for a particular transaction).
ANNEX IX
EUROSYSTEM CREDIT ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK PERFORMANCE MONITORING PROCESS
1. For each credit assessment system, the Eurosystem credit assessment framework (ECAF) performance monitoring process consists of an annual ex post comparison of:
the observed default rates for all eligible entities and debt instruments rated by the credit assessment system, whereby these entities and instruments are grouped into static pools based on certain characteristics, e.g. credit rating, asset class, industry sector, credit quality assessment model; and
the maximum probability of default associated with the respective credit quality step of the Eurosystem's harmonised rating scale.
2. The first element of the process is the annual compilation by the credit assessment system provider of the list of entities and debt instruments with credit quality assessments that satisfy the Eurosystem credit quality requirements at the beginning of the monitoring period. This list must then be submitted by the credit assessment system provider to the Eurosystem, using the template provided by the Eurosystem, which includes identification, classification and credit quality assessment-related fields.
3. The second element of the process takes place at the end of the 12-month monitoring period. The credit assessment system provider updates the performance data for the entities and debt instruments on the list. The Eurosystem reserves the right to request any additional information required in order to conduct performance monitoring.
4. The observed default rate of the static pools of a credit assessment system recorded over a one-year horizon is input to the ECAF performance monitoring process, which comprises an annual rule and a multi-period assessment.
5. In the event of a significant deviation between the observed default rate of the static pools and the maximum probability of default of the relevant credit quality step over an annual and/or a multi-annual period, the Eurosystem will consult the credit assessment system provider to analyse the reasons for that deviation.
ANNEX IXa
Minimum coverage requirements for external credit assessment institutions in the Eurosystem credit assessment framework
This Annex applies to the acceptance of a credit rating agency (CRA) as an ECAI in the Eurosystem credit assessment framework, as specified in Article 120(2).
1. COVERAGE REQUIREMENTS
►M6 Concerning current coverage, in each of at least three out of the four asset classes (a) unsecured bank bonds, (b) corporate bonds, (c) covered bonds and (d) ABS, the CRA must provide a minimum coverage of: ◄
10 % in the eligible universe of euro area assets, computed in terms of rated assets and rated issuers, except for the ABS asset class, for which coverage in terms of rated assets only will apply;
20 % in the eligible universe of euro area assets, computed in terms of nominal amounts outstanding;
in at least 2/3 of the euro area countries with eligible assets in the respective asset classes, the CRA must provide the required coverage of rated assets, rated issuers or rated nominal amounts as referred to in points (i) and (ii).
The CRA must provide sovereign ratings for, at a minimum, all euro area issuer residence countries where assets in one of the four asset classes mentioned in paragraph 1 are rated by this CRA, with the exception of assets for which the Eurosystem considers the respective country risk assessment to be irrelevant for the credit rating provided by the CRA for the issue, issuer or guarantor.
Concerning historical coverage, the CRA must meet at least 80 % of the minimum coverage requirements outlined in paragraphs 1 and 2 in each of the last three years prior to the application for ECAF acceptance, and must meet 100 % of those requirements at the time of application and during the entire period of ECAF acceptance.
2. CALCULATION OF COVERAGE
Coverage is calculated on the basis of credit ratings issued or endorsed by the CRA in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 and meeting all other requirements for ECAF purposes. For historical coverage, only the Eurosystem collateral eligibility requirements that were in force at the relevant point in time and only ratings that had been issued or endorsed in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 at the relevant point in time will be considered.
The coverage of a given CRA is based on credit ratings of eligible assets for Eurosystem monetary policy operations, and is computed in line with the priority rules under Article 84 by considering only that CRA's ratings.
In the calculation of the minimum coverage of a CRA not yet accepted for ECAF purposes, the Eurosystem also includes relevant credit ratings provided for assets that are not eligible because of the lack of a rating from ECAF-accepted external credit assessment institutions (ECAI).
3. REVIEW OF COMPLIANCE
The compliance of ECAIs accepted with these coverage requirements will be reviewed annually.
Non-compliance with the coverage requirements may be sanctioned in accordance with ECAF rules and procedures.
ANNEX IXb
Minimum requirements in the Eurosystem credit assessment framework for new issue and surveillance reports on covered bond programmes
1. INTRODUCTION
For the purposes of the Eurosystem credit assessment framework (ECAF), external credit assessment institutions (ECAIs), in respect of the Article 120(2), must comply with specific operational criteria in relation to covered bonds, with effect from 1 July 2017. In particular, ECAIs shall:
explain newly rated covered bond programmes in a publicly available credit rating report; and
make surveillance reports on covered bond programmes available on a quarterly basis.
This Annex sets out these minimum requirements in detail.
The requirements apply to issue ratings as referred to in Article 83 and therefore encompass all asset and programme ratings for eligible covered bonds. ECAIs' compliance with these requirements will be regularly reviewed. If the criteria are not fulfilled for a particular covered bond programme, the Eurosystem may deem the public credit rating(s) related to the relevant covered bond programme not to meet the high credit standards of the ECAF. Thus, the relevant ECAI's public credit rating may not be used to establish the credit quality requirements for marketable assets issued under the specific covered bond programme.
2. MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS
The publicly available credit rating reports (new issue report) referred to in paragraph 1(a) must include a comprehensive analysis of the structural and legal aspects of the programme, a detailed collateral pool assessment, an analysis of the refinancing and market risk, an analysis of the transaction participants, ECAI proprietary assumptions and metrics, and an analysis of any other relevant details of the transaction.
The surveillance reports referred to in paragraph 1(b) must be published by the ECAI no later than eight weeks after the end of each quarter. The surveillance reports must contain the following information.
Any ECAI proprietary metrics, including the latest available dynamic proprietary metrics used in the determination of the rating. If the date to which the proprietary metrics refer differs from the publication date of the report, the date to which the proprietary metrics refer should be specified.
A programme overview, to include, at a minimum, the outstanding assets and liabilities, the issuer and other key transaction parties, the main collateral asset type, the legal framework to which the programme is subject, and the rating of the programme and the issuer.
Overcollateralisation levels, including current and committed overcollateralisation.
The asset-liability profile, including the maturity type of the covered bonds, e.g. hard bullet, soft bullet, or pass through, the weighted average life of the covered bonds and of the cover pool and information on interest rate and currency mismatches.
Interest rate and currency swap arrangements existing at the time of the publication of the report, including the swap counterparty names and, where available, their legal entity identifiers.
The distribution of currencies, including a breakdown in terms of value at the level of both the cover pool and the individual bonds and including the percentage of euro-denominated assets and the percentage of euro-denominated bonds.
Cover pool assets, including the asset balance, asset types, number and average size of loans, seasoning, maturity, loan-to-valuation ratios, regional distribution and arrears distribution. As regards regional distributions, if the cover pool assets consist of loans originated in different countries, the surveillance report must, as a minimum, present the distribution across countries and the regional distribution for the main country of origin.
Cover pool substitute assets, including the asset balance.
The list of all rated securities in the programme, identified by their international securities identification number (ISIN). This disclosure can also be made via a separate, downloadable file published on the ECAI's website.
A list of data definitions and data sources used in the production of the surveillance report. This disclosure can also be made via a separate file published on the ECAI's website.
Surveillance reports for multi-cédulas must contain all the information required under points (i) to (x). In addition, these reports must include the list of the relevant originators and their respective shares in the multi-cédula. Asset-specific information must be reported either directly in the multi-cédula's surveillance report or by reference to the surveillance reports for each individual cédula rated by the ECAI.
ANNEX IXc
ECAI ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA AND APPLICATION PROCESS
This Annex sets out in detail the acceptance criteria for external credit assessment institutions (ECAIs) and the process for a credit rating agency (CRA) to apply to become accepted as an ECAI under the Eurosystem credit assessment framework (ECAF), as provided for in Article 120 of this Guideline.
I. APPLICATION PROCESS FOR ACCEPTANCE AS AN ECAI UNDER THE ECAF
1. An application by a CRA for acceptance as an ECAI under the ECAF must be submitted to the ECB’s Directorate Risk Management (DRMSecretariat@ecb.europa.eu). The application must provide appropriate reasoning and supporting documentation as set out in Section II, demonstrating the applicant’s compliance with the requirements for ECAIs set out in this Guideline. The application, reasoning and supporting documentation must be provided in writing in English, using any applicable templates and in electronic format.
2. In the first stage of the application process, the CRA must demonstrate its compliance with the relevant coverage requirements set out in Article 120 of and Annex IXa to this Guideline, as well as in this Annex, and, if the CRA’s application to be accepted under the ECAF was previously rejected by the Eurosystem, how it has addressed its previous non-compliance. The individual steps in this first stage are as follows.
The CRA must provide to the ECB the documentation and information set out in Section II.1 below. The CRA may also provide any other information it considers relevant to demonstrate its compliance with the relevant coverage requirements and, if applicable, how the CRA has remedied its previous non-compliance.
The ECB will assess whether the documentation and information provided under Section II.1 is complete. If the information is not complete, the ECB will request the CRA to provide additional information.
In accordance with Section II.2, the ECB may request any supplemental information necessary to commence its assessment of the CRA’s compliance with the relevant coverage requirements and, if applicable, how the CRA has remedied its previous non-compliance.
After the ECB has assessed an application as complete and after having requested and received any supplemental information, if necessary, the ECB will notify the CRA accordingly.
The ECB will assess whether the CRA complies with the relevant coverage requirements set out in Article 120 of and Annex IXa to this Guideline, as well as in this Annex, based on the information provided pursuant to Section II.1 and 2, taking both a quantitative and qualitative perspective of the concept of coverage as further specified in Section III.2.
As part of its assessment of the CRA’s compliance with relevant coverage requirements, the ECB may require the CRA to grant access to rating reports to illustrate the compliance of ratings with the ECAF requirements.
The ECB may request additional clarifications or information from the CRA at any time during its assessment of the relevant coverage requirements and, if applicable, how the CRA has remedied its previous non-compliance.
The Eurosystem will adopt a reasoned decision on the CRA’s compliance with the relevant coverage requirements and, if applicable, how the CRA has remedied its previous non-compliance. It will notify its decision to the CRA concerned. Where the Eurosystem decides that the CRA does not meet the relevant coverage requirements and/or, if applicable, has not remedied its previous non-compliance, it will provide reasons for its decision in the notification.
Simultaneously with any decision notified to the CRA under point (h), the Eurosystem will notify the CRA of whether or not it exercises its reserved right to decide not to initiate an ECAF acceptance procedure pursuant to Article 120(2) of this Guideline, that is, not to permit a CRA to proceed to the second stage of the application process. The Eurosystem will provide reasons for its decision in the notification. To support such a decision, the Eurosystem may take into account, among other things, whether information provided by the CRA or derived from other sources raise material concerns that the CRA’s acceptance in the ECAF would prevent the efficient implementation of the ECAF or would not be in accordance with the principles of the risk control function of the ECAF for the Eurosystem’s collateral framework.
3. If the ECB decides that the CRA complies with the relevant coverage requirements and, where applicable, has remedied its previous non-compliance and the ECB decides to initiate an ECAF acceptance procedure, the CRA may proceed to the second stage of the application process. In the second stage, the CRA must demonstrate its compliance with all other relevant requirements set out in this Guideline. The individual steps in the second stage are as follows.
The CRA must provide to the ECB the documentation and information set out in Section II.3. The CRA may also provide any other information it considers relevant to demonstrate its compliance with the requirements set out in this Guideline.
The ECB will assess whether the documentation and information provided in relation to Section II.3 is complete. If the information is not complete, the ECB will request the CRA to provide additional information.
In accordance with Section II.4, the ECB may request any supplemental information necessary to commence its assessment of the CRA’s compliance with the requirements set out in this Guideline.
After the ECB has assessed an application as complete and after having requested and received any supplemental information, if necessary, in relation to coverage, the ECB will notify the CRA accordingly.
The Eurosystem will assess whether the CRA complies with the requirements set out in this Guideline based on the documentation and information provided pursuant to Section II.3 and 4 and any other relevant information available from other sources, including the CRA’s website. It will conduct its assessment with a view to ensuring the efficient implementation of the ECAF, maintaining the Eurosystem’s requirement for high credit standards for eligible assets and safeguarding the risk control function of the ECAF for the Eurosystem’s collateral framework.
As part of its assessment of the CRA’s capacity to fulfil the criteria and rules of the ECAF performance monitoring process, the Eurosystem will apply the ECAF performance monitoring process described in Article 126 of this Guideline to the CRA’s ratings covering at least three years and preferably five years prior to the application, in accordance with Section II.3 and Section III. The Eurosystem may also assess the actual ratings of the CRA against other credit assessment systems, based on its experience and knowledge gained under the ECAF.
As part of its assessment, the Eurosystem may require the CRA to arrange for one or more on-site visits of Eurosystem staff at the CRA’s premises and/or live meetings of the relevant CRA staff with Eurosystem staff at the ECB’s premises. If such a visit or meeting is required, it shall be considered a mandatory requirement of the application process.
As part of its assessment, the Eurosystem may require the CRA to grant access to rating reports to illustrate the compliance of asset ratings with the disclosure requirements set out in Annex IXb and the availability of information requirements in Article 120 and further specified in Section III.3.
The Eurosystem may request additional clarifications or information from the CRA at any time during its assessment.
The Eurosystem will adopt a reasoned decision on the CRA’s compliance with the requirements set out in this Guideline and its acceptance as an ECAI in the ECAF. It will notify its decision to the CRA concerned. Where the ECB decides that the CRA does not meet the requirements set out in this Guideline and is not to be accepted as an ECAI in the ECAF, it will provide reasons for its decision in the notification.
If the Eurosystem decides to accept the CRA as an ECAI in the ECAF, the ECB will also notify the CRA of the next steps required to integrate the CRA as an ECAI in the ECAF on an operational level.
II. INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR AN APPLICATION FOR ECAF ACCEPTANCE TO BE DEEMED COMPLETE
1. As regards the first stage of the application process, a CRA must provide the following information.
The CRA’s own estimates of its rating coverage.
A statement certified by the CRA attesting to its compliance with all ECAF requirements contained in this Guideline for which it can assess its own compliance.
Disaggregated ratings data on a granular rating level to permit the ECB to confirm the compliance of the CRA with the relevant coverage requirements. The ratings data must be submitted in the applicable ECB templates available provided by the ECB and which contain instructions regarding the presentation of the data. The data must cover all asset, issuer and guarantor ratings that are eligible for ECAF purposes in accordance with this Guideline as well as static information on the related assets, issuers and guarantors as provided for in the templates.
Ratings data demonstrating the required rating coverage at the time of the application and in each of the three year’s prior to the application, that is, 36 months prior to the application date. The ratings data must show the required coverage with data snapshots measured at every six month interval in the relevant 36 months preceding the application.
If the CRA’s application to be accepted under the ECAF was previously rejected by the Eurosystem, supporting documentation demonstrating how it has addressed its previous non-compliance.
2. The ECB may request supplemental information, for example, to demonstrate the stability of a CRA’s coverage over time, the CRA’s rating issuance practices and the quality of the CRA’s ratings during the relevant coverage period.
3. As regards the second stage of the application process, a CRA must provide the following documentation and information:
A description of the CRA’s organisation, including its corporate and ownership structure, its business strategy, in particular regarding its strategy to maintain relevant coverage for ECAF purposes, and its rating process, in particular how rating committees are composed and their decision-making processes.
All documents relevant to its rating methodologies, rating scale(s) and default definitions.
New issue, rating and surveillance reports related to ratings selected by the ECB.
The historical record of the CRA’s default events covering at least three years and preferably five years as well as the definition of default used by the CRA, in order for the Eurosystem to perform an ex post performance monitoring of the CRA in accordance with the performance monitoring framework. This will also form the basis for mapping the ratings to the Eurosystem’s harmonised rating scale. The submission must include:
global disaggregated data on all ratings, including those that are not ECAF-eligible, for example due to geographic or other restrictions;
corresponding rating transition tables and default statistics.
The disaggregated ratings data must be submitted in the applicable ECB templates available on the ECB’s website and which contain instructions regarding the presentation of the data. The data must cover all asset, issuer and guarantor ratings that are eligible for ECAF purposes in accordance with this Guideline as well as static information on the related assets, issuers and guarantors as provided for in the templates.
Information on the operational aspects of how the Eurosystem would be able to access and use the CRA’s ratings, including the CRA’s data feed, fees and necessary contractual arrangements to access ratings.
4. The ECB may request relevant supplemental information from the CRA, such as in relation to the CRA’s ratings of assets, issuers and guarantors which are not eligible under the ECAF, for example, due to geographical restrictions.
III. ECAF ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
1. In order to be accepted in the ECAF, a CRA must comply with the applicable requirements in this Guideline, including relevant coverage so as to ensure the efficient implementation of the ECAF, operational criteria, the availability of information on ECAI credit assessments and for the purposes of the performance monitoring processes and the capacity to fulfil the criteria and rules of the ECAF performance monitoring process.
2. In relation to the requirement of relevant coverage:
a CRA must comply with the coverage requirements specified in Annex IXa to this Guideline;
only ratings that were actually issued or endorsed by the CRA in accordance with Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 at the relevant point in time in the three years prior to the data of the application are considered by the Eurosystem, retrospective ratings are not accepted;
the Eurosystem will take the stability of the relevant coverage over time into account, including the pace of any increases or decreases in such coverage.
3. In relation to the availability of information on ECAI credit assessments and for the purposes of the performance monitoring processes:
a CRA must ensure high levels of transparency in documents relevant to its rating methodologies and actual rating actions. The CRA must ensure that all information necessary to understand an ECAI credit assessment, such as rating or surveillance reports or other publications on its website, are readily accessible and comprehensible. If a specific asset rating does not comply with applicable disclosure requirements, this renders it ineligible for ECAF purposes but it may be considered in the Eurosystem’s assessment of the transparency of the CRA’s general rating processes;
a CRA must ensure transparency in relation to its rating process and how it maintains sound rating issuance practices. All methodological documents shall demonstrate a thorough expertise and the methodologies should take into account all relevant information for the purpose of issuing credit assessments. In this regard, the Eurosystem may analyse, among other things, the number of ratings issued per analyst, the size, composition and expertise of members of the rating committee, the degree of independence of the rating committee from rating analysts, the frequency of rating reviews and the reasons for large issuances of ratings. The Eurosystem may take into account any current and past supervisory measures against a CRA by ESMA pursuant to Article 24(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 in its assessment of the reliability and quality of a CRA’s rating processes and practices;
a CRA must apply its methodologies consistently to its credit ratings.
4. In relation to a CRA’s capacity to fulfil the criteria and rules of the ECAF performance monitoring process, the performance of the CRA’s ratings and its default assignments must be consistent over time to (a) ensure the appropriate mapping of the credit assessment information provided by the credit assessment system to the Eurosystem’s harmonised rating scale; and (b) to maintain the comparability of the results from the CRA’s credit assessments across the ECAF’s systems and sources. The CRA’s observed rating transition tables and default statistics should be in line with the expected values based on the CRA’s own rating scales, because, as set out in Annex IX to this Guideline, deviations between observed default rates and assigned probability of default can call into question the quality of credit assessments, thus hampering the efficient implementation of the ECAF.
5. In relation to the operational criteria:
a CRA must provide daily rating information to all Eurosystem central banks in accordance with the format and distribution method required by the Eurosystem;
a CRA must ensure prompt access to relevant rating information for the Eurosystem that is necessary for ECAF eligibility and on-going monitoring requirements, including press releases, new issue reports, surveillance reports, information regarding rating coverage, in a resource- and cost-efficient manner;
a CRA must be willing to enter into contractual arrangements with the Eurosystem in the event of its acceptance in the ECAF with sufficient data access and reasonable access fees.
6. All ECAF acceptance criteria must be fulfilled in order for a CRA to be accepted in the ECAF. As the application to be accepted in the ECAF requires a highly technical qualitative and quantitative assessment, the Eurosystem may assess further relevant factors related to the requirements of this Guideline on the ECAF, if necessary.
IV. ECAF ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA FOR ECAIS AND COMPLIANCE OVER TIME
1. The acceptance criteria for ECAIs must be fulfilled by CRAs at the time of their application for acceptance and at all times after their acceptance under the ECAF.
2. The Eurosystem may apply measures pursuant to Article 126 of this Guideline to a CRA that:
was accepted in the ECAF after making false statements or by any other irregular means; or
no longer fulfils the acceptance criteria for the ECAF.
When notifying the CRA of its decision to apply measures pursuant Article 126, the Eurosystem will provide reasons for its decision.
▼M3 —————
ANNEX XI
SECURITY FORMS
On 13 June 2006 the European Central Bank (ECB) announced the new global notes (NGN) criteria for international global bearer form securities that would be eligible as collateral for Eurosystem credit operations from 1 January 2007. On 22 October 2008 the ECB announced that international debt securities in global registered form issued after 30 September 2010, would only be eligible as collateral for Eurosystem credit operations when the new safekeeping structure for international debt securities (NSS) is used.
The following table summarises the eligibility rules for the different forms of securities with the introduction of the NGN and NSS criteria.
Table 1
Eligibility rules for different security forms
Global/individual |
Bearer/registered |
NGN/classic global note (CGN)/NSS |
Is the common safekeeper (CSK) an ICSD (*1)? |
Eligible? |
Global |
Bearer |
NGN |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
No |
|||
Global |
Bearer |
CGN |
N/A |
No, but those securities issued before 1 January 2007 will be grandfathered until maturity, plus any tap issues from 1 January 2007 when the ISINs are fungible. |
Global |
Registered |
CGN |
N/A |
Bonds issued under this structure after 30 September 2010 are no longer eligible. |
Global |
Registered |
NSS |
Yes |
Yes |
Individual |
Bearer |
N/A |
N/A |
Bonds issued under this structure after 30 September 2010 are no longer eligible. Individual bearer notes issued on or before 30 September 2010 are grandfathered until maturity. |
(*1)
Or, should it become applicable, in a positively assessed central securities depository |
ANNEX XII
EXAMPLES OF EUROSYSTEM MONETARY POLICY OPERATIONS AND PROCEDURES
List of examples |
|
Example 1 |
Liquidity-providing reverse transaction by fixed rate tender |
Example 2 |
Liquidity-providing reverse transaction by variable rate tender |
Example 3 |
Issuance of European Central Bank (ECB) debt certificates by variable rate tender |
Example 4 |
Liquidity-absorbing foreign exchange swap by variable rate tender |
Example 5 |
Liquidity-providing foreign exchange swap by variable rate tender |
Example 6 |
Risk control measures |
I. EXAMPLE 1: LIQUIDITY-PROVIDING REVERSE TRANSACTION BY FIXED RATE TENDER
1. The ECB decides to provide liquidity to the market by means of a reverse transaction organised with a fixed rate tender procedure.
2. Three counterparties submit the following bids:
Counterparty |
Bid (EUR million) |
Bank 1 |
30 |
Bank 2 |
40 |
Bank 3 |
70 |
Total |
140 |
3. The ECB decides to allot a total of EUR 105 million.
4. The percentage of allotment is:
5. The allotment to the counterparties is:
Counterparty |
Bid (EUR million) |
Allotment (EUR million) |
Bank 1 |
30 |
22,5 |
Bank 2 |
40 |
30,0 |
Bank 3 |
70 |
52,5 |
Total |
140 |
105,0 |
II. EXAMPLE 2: LIQUIDITY-PROVIDING REVERSE TRANSACTION BY VARIABLE RATE TENDER
1. The ECB decides to provide liquidity to the market by means of a reverse transaction organised with a variable rate tender procedure.
2. Three counterparties submit the following bids:
|
Amount (EUR million) |
||||
Interest rate (%) |
Bank 1 |
Bank 2 |
Bank 3 |
Total bids |
Cumulative bids |
3,15 |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
3,10 |
|
5 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
3,09 |
|
5 |
5 |
10 |
20 |
3,08 |
|
5 |
5 |
10 |
30 |
3,07 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
20 |
50 |
3,06 |
5 |
10 |
15 |
30 |
80 |
3,05 |
10 |
10 |
15 |
35 |
115 |
3,04 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
15 |
130 |
3,03 |
5 |
|
10 |
15 |
145 |
Total |
30 |
45 |
70 |
145 |
|
3. The ECB decides to allot EUR 94 million, implying a marginal interest rate of 3,05 %.
4. All bids above 3,05 % (for a cumulative amount of EUR 80 million) are fully satisfied. At 3,05 % the percentage of allotment is:
5. The allotment to Bank 1 at the marginal interest rate is, for example:
0,4 × 10 = 4
6. The total allotment to Bank 1 is:
5 + 5 + 4 = 14
7. The allotment results can be summarised as follows:
|
Amount (EUR million) |
|||
Counterparties |
Bank 1 |
Bank 2 |
Bank 3 |
Total |
Total bids |
30,0 |
45,0 |
70,0 |
145 |
Total allotment |
14,0 |
34,0 |
46,0 |
94 |
8. If the allotment procedure follows a single rate (Dutch) auction, the interest rate applied to the amounts allotted to the counterparties is 3,05 %.
9. If the allotment procedure follows a multiple rate (American) auction, no single interest rate is applied to the amounts allotted to the counterparties; for example, Bank 1 receives EUR 5 million at 3,07 %, EUR 5 million at 3,06 % and EUR 4 million at 3,05 %.
III. EXAMPLE 3: ISSUANCE OF ECB DEBT CERTIFICATES BY VARIABLE RATE TENDER
1. The ECB decides to absorb liquidity from the market by issuing debt certificates using a variable rate tender procedure.
2. Three counterparties submit the following bids:
|
Amount (EUR million) |
||||
Interest rate (%) |
Bank 1 |
Bank 2 |
Bank 3 |
Total |
Cumulative bids |
3,00 |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
3,01 |
5 |
|
5 |
10 |
10 |
3,02 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
15 |
25 |
3,03 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
15 |
40 |
3,04 |
10 |
5 |
10 |
25 |
65 |
3,05 |
20 |
40 |
10 |
70 |
135 |
3,06 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
25 |
160 |
3,08 |
5 |
|
10 |
15 |
175 |
3,10 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
180 |
Total |
55 |
70 |
55 |
180 |
|
3. The ECB decides to allot a nominal amount of EUR 124,5 million, implying a marginal interest rate of 3,05 %.
4. All bids below 3,05 % (for a cumulative amount of EUR 65 million) are fully satisfied. At 3,05 % the percentage of allotment is:
5. The allotment to Bank 1 at the marginal interest rate is, for example:
0,85 × 20 = 17
6. The total allotment to Bank 1 is:
5 + 5 + 5 + 10 + 17 = 42
7. The allotment results can be summarised as follows:
|
Amount (EUR million) |
|||
Counterparties |
Bank 1 |
Bank 2 |
Bank 3 |
Total |
Total bids |
55,0 |
70,0 |
55,0 |
180,0 |
Total allotment |
42,0 |
49,0 |
33,5 |
124,5 |
IV. EXAMPLE 4: LIQUIDITY-ABSORBING FOREIGN EXCHANGE SWAP BY VARIABLE RATE TENDER
1. The ECB decides to absorb liquidity from the market by executing a foreign exchange swap on the EUR/USD rate by means of a variable rate tender procedure. (Note: The euro is traded at a premium in this example.)
2. Three counterparties submit the following bids:
|
Amount (EUR million) |
||||
Swap points (× 10 000 ) |
Bank 1 |
Bank 2 |
Bank 3 |
Total |
Cumulative bids |
6,84 |
|
|
|
0 |
0 |
6,80 |
5 |
|
5 |
10 |
10 |
6,76 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
15 |
25 |
6,71 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
15 |
40 |
6,67 |
10 |
10 |
5 |
25 |
65 |
6,63 |
25 |
35 |
40 |
100 |
165 |
6,58 |
10 |
20 |
10 |
40 |
205 |
6,54 |
5 |
10 |
10 |
25 |
230 |
6,49 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
235 |
Total |
65 |
90 |
80 |
235 |
|
3. The ECB decides to allot EUR 158 million, implying 6,63 marginal swap points. All bids above 6,63 (for a cumulative amount of EUR 65 million) are fully satisfied. At 6,63 the percentage of allotment is:
4. The allotment to Bank 1 at the marginal swap points is, for example:
0,93 × 25 = 23,25
5. The total allotment to Bank 1 is:
5 + 5 + 5 + 10 + 23,25 = 48,25
6. The allotment results can be summarised as follows:
|
Amount (EUR million) |
|||
Counterparties |
Bank 1 |
Bank 2 |
Bank 3 |
Total |
Total bids |
65,0 |
90,0 |
80,0 |
235,0 |
Total allotment |
48,25 |
52,55 |
57,20 |
158,0 |
7. The ECB fixes the spot EUR/USD exchange rate for the operation at 1,1300.
8. If the allotment procedure follows a single rate (Dutch) auction, at the start date of the operation the Eurosystem buys EUR 158 000 000 and sells USD 178 540 000 . At the maturity date of the operation, the Eurosystem sells EUR 158 000 000 and buys USD 178 644 754 (the forward exchange rate is 1,130663 = 1,1300 + 0,000663).
9. If the allotment procedure follows a multiple rate (American) auction, the Eurosystem exchanges the amounts of euro and US dollars shown in the following table:
Spot transaction |
Forward transaction |
||||
Exchange rate |
Buy EUR |
Sell USD |
Exchange rate |
Sell EUR |
Buy USD |
1,1300 |
|
|
1,130684 |
|
|
1,1300 |
10 000 000 |
11 300 000 |
1,130680 |
10 000 000 |
11 306 800 |
1,1300 |
15 000 000 |
16 950 000 |
1,130676 |
15 000 000 |
16 960 140 |
1,1300 |
15 000 000 |
16 950 000 |
1,130671 |
15 000 000 |
16 960 065 |
1,1300 |
25 000 000 |
28 250 000 |
1,130667 |
25 000 000 |
28 266 675 |
1,1300 |
93 000 000 |
105 090 000 |
1,130663 |
93 000 000 |
105 151 659 |
1,1300 |
|
|
1,130658 |
|
|
1,1300 |
|
|
1,130654 |
|
|
1,1300 |
|
|
1,130649 |
|
|
Total |
158 000 000 |
178 540 000 |
|
158 000 000 |
178 645 339 |
V. EXAMPLE 5: LIQUIDITY-PROVIDING FOREIGN EXCHANGE SWAP BY VARIABLE RATE TENDER
1. The ECB decides to provide liquidity to the market by executing a foreign exchange swap on the EUR/USD rate by means of a variable rate tender procedure. (Note: The euro is traded at a premium in this example.)
2. Three counterparties submit the following bids:
|
Amount (EUR million) |
||||
Swap points (× 10 000 ) |
Bank 1 |
Bank 2 |
Bank 3 |
Total |
Cumulative bids |
6,23 |
|
|
|
|
|
6,27 |
5 |
|
5 |
10 |
10 |
6,32 |
5 |
|
5 |
10 |
20 |
6,36 |
10 |
5 |
5 |
20 |
40 |
6,41 |
10 |
10 |
20 |
40 |
80 |
6,45 |
20 |
40 |
20 |
80 |
160 |
6,49 |
5 |
20 |
10 |
35 |
195 |
6,54 |
5 |
5 |
10 |
20 |
215 |
6,58 |
|
5 |
|
5 |
220 |
Total |
60 |
85 |
75 |
220 |
|
3. The ECB decides to allot EUR 197 million, implying 6,54 marginal swap points. All bids below 6,54 (for a cumulative amount of EUR 195 million) are fully satisfied. At 6,54 the percentage of allotment is:
4. The allotment to Bank 1 at the marginal swap points is, for example:
0,10 × 5 = 0,5
5. The total allotment to Bank 1 is:
5 + 5 + 10 + 10 + 20 + 5 + 0,5 = 55,5
6. The allotment results can be summarised as follows:
|
Amount (EUR million) |
|||
Counterparties |
Bank 1 |
Bank 2 |
Bank 3 |
Total |
Total bids |
60,0 |
85,0 |
75,0 |
220 |
Total allotment |
55,5 |
75,5 |
66,0 |
197 |
6. The ECB fixes the spot EUR/USD exchange rate for the operation at 1,1300.
7. If the allotment procedure follows a single rate (Dutch) auction, at the start date of the operation the Eurosystem sells EUR 197 000 000 and buys USD 222 610 000 . At the maturity date of the operation, the Eurosystem buys EUR 197 000 000 and sells USD 222 738 838 (the forward exchange rate is 1,130654 = 1,1300 + 0,000654).
8. If the allotment procedure follows a multiple rate (American) auction, the Eurosystem exchanges the amounts of euro and US dollars shown in the following table:
Spot transaction |
Forward transaction* |
||||
Exchange rate |
Sell EUR |
Buy USD |
Exchange rate |
Buy EUR |
Sell USD |
1,1300 |
|
|
1,130623 |
|
|
1,1300 |
10 000 000 |
11 300 000 |
1,130627 |
10 000 000 |
11 306 270 |
1,1300 |
10 000 000 |
11 300 000 |
1,130632 |
10 000 000 |
11 306 320 |
1,1300 |
20 000 000 |
22 600 000 |
1,130636 |
20 000 000 |
22 612 720 |
1,1300 |
40 000 000 |
45 200 000 |
1,130641 |
40 000 000 |
45 225 640 |
1,1300 |
80 000 000 |
90 400 000 |
1,130645 |
80 000 000 |
90 451 600 |
1,1300 |
35 000 000 |
39 550 000 |
1,130649 |
35 000 000 |
39 572 715 |
1,1300 |
2 000 000 |
2 260 000 |
1,130654 |
2 000 000 |
2 261 308 |
1,1300 |
|
|
1,130658 |
|
|
Total |
197 000 000 |
222 610 000 |
|
197 000 000 |
222 736 573 |
VI. EXAMPLE 6: RISK CONTROL MEASURES
1. This example illustrates the risk control framework applied to assets mobilised as collateral in the Eurosystem credit operations. It is based on the assumption that, in the calculation of the need for a margin call, accrued interest on the liquidity provided is taken into account and a trigger point of 0,5 % of the liquidity provided is applied. The example is based on the assumption that a counterparty participates in the following Eurosystem monetary policy operations:
a main refinancing operation starting on 30 July 2014 and ending on 6 August 2014 where the counterparty is allotted EUR 50 million at an interest rate of 0,15 %;
a longer-term refinancing operation starting on 31 July 2014 and ending on 23 October 2014 where the counterparty is allotted EUR 45 million at an interest rate of 0,15 %;
a main refinancing operation starting on 6 August 2014 and ending on 13 August 2014 where the counterparty is allotted EUR 35 million at an interest rate of 0,15 %.
2. The characteristics of the marketable assets mobilised by the counterparty to cover these operations are specified in Table 1.
Table 1
Marketable assets mobilised in the transactions
Characteristics
Name |
Asset class |
Maturity date |
Coupon definition |
Coupon frequency |
Residual maturity |
Haircut |
Asset A |
►M9 Jumbo covered bond ◄ |
30.8.2018 |
Fixed rate |
6 months |
4 years |
2,50 % |
Asset B |
Central government bond |
19.11.2018 |
Variable rate |
12 months |
4 years |
0,50 % |
Asset C |
Corporate bond |
12.5.2025 |
Zero coupon rate |
|
> 10 years |
13,00 % |
Prices in percentages (including accrued interest) (*1)
30.7.2014 |
31.7.2014 |
1.8.2014 |
4.8.2014 |
5.8.2014 |
6.8.2014 |
7.8.2014 |
101,61 |
101,21 |
99,50 |
99,97 |
99,73 |
100,01 |
100,12 |
|
98,12 |
97,95 |
98,15 |
98,56 |
98,59 |
98,57 |
|
|
|
|
|
53,71 |
53,62 |
(*1)
The prices shown for a specific valuation date correspond to the most representative price on the business day preceding this valuation date. |
EARMARKING SYSTEM
First, it is assumed that the transactions are carried out with a national central bank (NCB) using a system where underlying assets are earmarked for each transaction. The valuation of assets mobilised as collateral is carried out on a daily basis. The risk control framework can then be described as follows (see also Table 2 below):
On 30 July 2014, the counterparty enters into a repurchase transaction with the NCB, which purchases EUR 50,6 million of Asset A. Asset A is a ►M9 jumbo covered bond ◄ with a fixed coupon maturing on 30 August 2018 and allocated to credit quality step 1-2. It thus has a residual maturity of four years, therefore requiring a valuation haircut of 2,5 %. The market price of Asset A on its reference market on that day is 101,61 %, which includes the accrued interest on the coupon. The counterparty is required to provide an amount of Asset A, which, after deduction of the 2,5 % valuation haircut, exceeds the allotted amount of EUR 50 million. The counterparty therefore delivers Asset A for a nominal amount of EUR 50,6 million, the adjusted market value of which is EUR 50 129 294 on that day.
On 31 July 2014, the counterparty enters into a repurchase transaction with the NCB, which purchases EUR 21 million of Asset A (market price 101,21 %, valuation haircut 2,5 %) and EUR 25 million of Asset B (market price 98,02 %). Asset B is a central government bond with variable rate coupon payments and allocated to credit quality step 1-2, to which a 0,5 % valuation haircut is applied. The adjusted market value of Asset A and Asset B on that day is EUR 45 130 098 , thus exceeding the required amount of EUR 45 000 000 .
On 31 July 2014, the assets underlying the main refinancing operation initiated on 30 July 2014 are revalued. With a market price of 101,21 %, the haircut-adjusted market value of Asset A is still within the lower and upper trigger amounts. The collateral that was mobilised initially is consequently considered to cater for both the initial amount of liquidity provided and the accrued interest amounting to EUR 208.
On 1 August 2014, the underlying assets are revalued: the market price of Asset A is 99,50 % and the market price of Asset B is 97,95 %. Accrued interest amounts to EUR 417 on the main refinancing operation initiated on 30 July 2014 and EUR 188 on the longer-term refinancing operation initiated on 31 July 2014. As a result, the adjusted market value of Asset A in the first transaction falls below the transaction's amount to be covered, i.e. the liquidity provided plus the accrued interest, by EUR 912 092 , but also below the lower trigger level of EUR 49 750 415 . The counterparty delivers EUR 950 000 of Asset A in nominal value terms, which, after deducting a 2,5 % haircut from the market value based on a price of 99,50 %, restores sufficient collateral coverage. NCBs may perform margin calls in cash rather than securities.
A margin call is also needed on the second transaction since the adjusted market value of the underlying assets used in this transaction (EUR 44 737 688 ) is below the lower trigger level (EUR 44 775 187 ). The counterparty therefore provides EUR 270 000 of Asset B with an adjusted market value of EUR 263 143 .
On 4 and 5 August 2014, the underlying assets are revalued, without resulting in any margin call for the transactions entered into on 30 and 31 July 2014.
On 6 August 2014, the counterparty repays the liquidity provided under the main refinancing operation initiated on 30 July 2014, including the accrued interest of EUR 1 458 . The NCB returns EUR 51 550 000 of Asset A in nominal value.
On the same day the counterparty enters into a new repurchase transaction with the NCB, which purchases EUR 75 million of Asset C in nominal value terms. Since Asset C is a zero coupon corporate bond with a residual maturity of more than 10 years and allocated to credit quality step 1-2, requiring a valuation haircut of 13 %, the corresponding haircut-adjusted market value on that day is of EUR 35 045 775 . The revaluation of assets underlying the long-term refinancing operation initiated on 31 July 2014 reveals that the adjusted market value of the assets provided exceeds the upper trigger level and leads to the NCB returning EUR 262 000 of Asset B in nominal value to the counterparty. If a margin had to be paid to the counterparty by the NCB in relation to the second transaction, such a margin could, in certain cases, be netted out with the margin paid to the NCB by the counterparty in relation to the first transaction. As a result, there would only be one margin settlement.
POOLING SYSTEM
Second, it is assumed that the transactions are carried out with an NCB using a pooling system where assets included in the pool of assets used by the counterparty are not earmarked for specific transactions:
The same sequence of transactions is used in this example as in the above example illustrating an earmarking system. The main difference is that, on the revaluation dates, the adjusted market value of all the assets in the pool has to cover the total amount of all of the counterparty's outstanding operations with the NCB. The margin call of EUR 1 174 592 occurring on 1 August 2014 is identical in this example to the one required in the earmarking system case. The counterparty delivers EUR 1 300 000 of Asset A in nominal value terms, which, after deducting a 2,5 % haircut from the market value based on a price of 99,50 %, restores sufficient collateral coverage.
Moreover, on 6 August 2014, when the main refinancing operation entered into on 30 July 2014 matures, the counterparty may keep the assets on its pool account. An asset can also be exchanged for another asset as shown in the example, where EUR 51,9 million of Asset A in nominal value are replaced with EUR 75,5 million of Asset C in nominal value to cover the liquidity provided and the accrued interest under all refinancing operations.
The risk control framework in the pooling system is described in Table 3.
Table 2
Earmarking System
Date |
Outstanding transactions |
Start date |
End date |
Interest rate |
Liquidity provided |
Accrued interest |
Total amount to be covered |
Lower trigger amount |
Upper trigger amount |
Adjusted market value |
Margin call |
30.7.2014 |
Main refinancing |
30.7.2014 |
6.8.2014 |
0,15 |
50 000 000 |
— |
50 000 000 |
49 750 000 |
50 250 000 |
50 129 294 |
— |
31.7.2014 |
Main refinancing |
30.7.2014 |
6.8.2014 |
0,15 |
50 000 000 |
208 |
50 000 208 |
49 750 207 |
50 250 209 |
49 931 954 |
— |
|
Longer-term refinancing |
31.7.2014 |
29.10.2014 |
0,15 |
45 000 000 |
— |
45 000 000 |
44 775 000 |
45 225 000 |
45 130 098 |
— |
1.8.2014 |
Main refinancing |
30.7.2014 |
6.8.2014 |
0,15 |
50 000 000 |
417 |
50 000 417 |
49 750 415 |
50 250 419 |
49 088 325 |
– 912 092 |
|
Longer-term refinancing |
31.7.2014 |
29.10.2014 |
0,15 |
45 000 000 |
188 |
45 000 188 |
44 775 187 |
45 225 188 |
44 737 688 |
– 262 500 |
4.8.2014 |
Main refinancing |
30.7.2014 |
6.8.2014 |
0,15 |
50 000 000 |
1 042 |
50 001 042 |
49 751 036 |
50 251 047 |
50 246 172 |
— |
|
Longer-term refinancing |
31.7.2014 |
29.10.2014 |
0,15 |
45 000 000 |
750 |
45 000 750 |
44 775 746 |
45 225 754 |
45 147 350 |
— |
5.8.2014 |
Main refinancing |
30.7.2014 |
6.8.2014 |
0,15 |
50 000 000 |
1 250 |
50 001 250 |
49 751 244 |
50 251 256 |
50 125 545 |
— |
|
Longer-term refinancing |
31.7.2014 |
29.10.2014 |
0,15 |
45 000 000 |
938 |
45 000 938 |
44 775 933 |
45 225 942 |
45 201 299 |
— |
6.8.2014 |
Main refinancing |
6.8.2014 |
13.8.2014 |
0,15 |
35 000 000 |
— |
35 000 000 |
34 825 000 |
35 175 000 |
35 045 775 |
— |
|
Longer-term refinancing |
31.7.2014 |
29.10.2014 |
0,15 |
45 000 000 |
1 125 |
45 001 125 |
44 776 119 |
45 226 131 |
45 266 172 |
265 047 |
7.8.2014 |
Main refinancing |
6.8.2014 |
13.8.2014 |
0,15 |
35 000 000 |
146 |
35 000 146 |
34 825 145 |
35 175 147 |
34 987 050 |
— |
|
Longer-term refinancing |
31.7.2014 |
29.10.2014 |
0,15 |
45 000 000 |
1 313 |
45 001 313 |
44 776 306 |
45 226 319 |
45 026 704 |
— |
Table 3
Pooling System
Date |
Outstanding transactions |
Start date |
End date |
Interest rate |
Liquidity provided |
Accrued interest |
Total amount to be covered |
Lower trigger amount (*1) |
Upper trigger amount (*2) |
Adjusted market value |
Margin call |
30.7.2014 |
Main refinancing |
30.7.2014 |
6.8.2014 |
0,15 |
50 000 000 |
— |
50 000 000 |
49 750 000 |
Not applicable |
50 129 294 |
— |
31.7.2014 |
Main refinancing |
30.7.2014 |
6.8.2014 |
0,15 |
50 000 000 |
208 |
95 000 208 |
94 525 207 |
Not applicable |
95 062 051 |
— |
|
Longer-term refinancing |
31.7.2014 |
29.10.2014 |
0,15 |
45 000 000 |
— |
|
|
|
|
|
1.8.2014 |
Main refinancing |
30.7.2014 |
6.8.2014 |
0,15 |
50 000 000 |
417 |
95 000 604 |
94 525 601 |
Not applicable |
93 826 013 |
– 1 174 592 |
|
Longer-term refinancing |
31.7.2014 |
29.10.2014 |
0,15 |
45 000 000 |
188 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.8.2014 |
Main refinancing |
30.7.2014 |
6.8.2014 |
0,15 |
50 000 000 |
1 042 |
95 001 792 |
94 526 783 |
Not applicable |
95 470 989 |
— |
|
Longer-term refinancing |
31.7.2014 |
29.10.2014 |
0,15 |
45 000 000 |
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.8.2014 |
Main refinancing |
30.7.2014 |
6.8.2014 |
0,15 |
50 000 000 |
1 250 |
95 002 188 |
94 527 177 |
Not applicable |
95 402 391 |
— |
|
Longer-term refinancing |
31.7.2014 |
29.10.2014 |
0,15 |
45 000 000 |
938 |
|
|
|
|
|
6.8.2014 |
Main refinancing |
6.8.2014 |
13.8.2014 |
0,15 |
35 000 000 |
— |
80 001 125 |
79 601 119 |
Not applicable |
80 280 724 |
— |
|
Longer-term refinancing |
31.7.2014 |
29.10.2014 |
0,15 |
45 000 000 |
1 125 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.8.2014 |
Main refinancing |
6.8.2014 |
13.8.2014 |
0,15 |
35 000 000 |
146 |
80 001 458 |
79 601 451 |
Not applicable |
80 239 155 |
— |
30.7.2014 |
Longer-term refinancing |
31.7.2014 |
29.10.2014 |
0,15 |
45 000 000 |
1 313 |
|
|
|
|
|
(*1)
In a pooling system, the lower trigger amount is the lowest threshold for margin calls. In practice most NCBs require additional collateral whenever the haircut adjusted market value of the collateral pool falls below the total amount to be covered.
(*2)
In a pooling system, the notion of upper trigger amount is not relevant, since the counterparty will constantly target an excess amount of collateral provided in order to minimise operational transactions. |
ANNEX XIIa
An entity that is considered an agency as defined in point (2) of Article 2 of this Guideline must fulfil the following quantitative criteria in order for its eligible marketable assets to be allocated to haircut category II as set out in Table 1 of the Annex to Guideline (EU) 2016/65 (ECB/2015/35):
the average of the sum of the nominal values outstanding of all eligible marketable assets issued by the agency is at least EUR 10 billion over the reference period; and
the average of the sum of the nominal values of all eligible marketable assets with a nominal value outstanding of at least EUR 500 million issued by the agency over the reference period results in a share equal to 50 % or more of the average of the sum of nominal value outstanding of all eligible marketable assets issued by that agency over the reference period.
Compliance with these quantitative criteria is assessed on an annual basis by calculating, in each given year, the relevant average over a one-year reference period starting on 1 August of the previous year and ending on 31 July of the current year.
ANNEX XIII
CORRELATION TABLE
This Guideline |
Guideline ECB/2011/14 |
Decision ECB/2013/6 |
Decision ECB/2013/35 |
Decision ECB/2014/23 |
Article 1(1) |
|
|
|
|
Article 1(2) |
Article 1 |
|
|
|
Article 1(3) |
Introduction |
|
|
|
Article 1(4) |
Section 1.6 |
|
|
|
Article 1(5) |
|
|
Article 2 |
|
Article 2(1) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(2) |
Section 6.4.2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(3) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(4) |
Section 5.2.1, Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(5) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(6) |
Annex II, Section II |
|
|
|
Article 2(7) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(8) |
Section 3.1.1.2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(9) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(10) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(11) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(12) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(13) |
Section 6.2.2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 2(14) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(15) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(16) |
Section 6.6 |
|
|
|
Article 2(17) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(18) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(19) |
Annex II, Point 20 |
|
|
|
Article 2(20) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(21) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(22) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(23) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(24) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(25) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(26) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(27) |
|
|
Article 3(2)(b)(ii)(d) |
|
Article 2(28) |
|
|
Article 10 |
|
Article 2(29) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(30) |
Section 4.1.3, Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(31) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(32) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(33) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(34) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(35) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(36) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(37) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(38) |
Section 5.1.1.3, Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(39) |
Section 6.4.2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(40) |
Section 3.4.1, 3.4.2, Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(41) |
Section 6.6.1 |
|
|
|
Article 2(42) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(43) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(44) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(45) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(46) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(47) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(48) |
Section 6.4.2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(49) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(50) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(51) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(52) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(53) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(54) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(55) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(56) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(57) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(58) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(59) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(60) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(61) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(62) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(63) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(64) |
Section 5.1.5.4, Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(65) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(66) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(67) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(68) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(69) |
Section 6.2.1.3 |
|
|
|
Article 2(70) |
Section 6.2.2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(71) |
Section 6.4.2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(72) |
Section 3.2.1, 3.2.2, Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(73) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(74) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(75) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(76) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(77) |
Section 3.1.1.2, Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(78) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(79) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(80) |
Section 3.1.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 2(81) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(82) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(83) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(84) |
Section 5.1.5.4, Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(85) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(86) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(87) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(88) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(89) |
Section 3.4.3 |
|
|
|
Article 2(90) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(91) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(92) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(93) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(94) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(95) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(96) |
|
|
|
|
Article 2(97) |
Box 7, Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(98) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(99) |
Section 5.1.1.3, Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 2(100) |
|
|
|
|
Article 3(1) |
Section 1.3 |
|
|
|
Article 3(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 4 |
|
|
|
|
Article 5(1) |
Preamble of Chapter 3 |
|
|
|
Article 5(2) |
Preamble of Chapter 3 |
|
|
|
Article 5(3) |
Preamble of Chapter 3, Section 1.3.3 |
|
|
|
Article 5(4) |
Preamble of Chapter 3, Section 1.3.3, Section 3.1.5 |
|
|
|
Article 5(5) |
Section 1.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 6(1) |
Section 3.1.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 6(2) |
Section 3.1.2 |
|
|
|
Article 6(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 6(4) |
|
|
|
|
Article 6(5) |
|
|
|
|
Article 6(6) |
|
|
|
|
Article 7(1) |
Section 3.1.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 7(2) |
Section 3.1.3 |
|
|
|
Article 7(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 7(4) |
|
|
|
|
Article 7(5) |
|
|
|
|
Article 7(6) |
Section 3.1.3 |
|
|
|
Article 8(1) |
Section 3.1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 8(2) |
Section 3.1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 8(3) |
Section 5.1.2.3, 5.2.5 |
|
|
|
Article 8(4) |
Section 3.1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 9(1) |
Section 3.1.5 |
|
|
|
Article 9(2) |
Section 3.1.5 |
|
|
|
Article 9(3) |
Section 3.1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 10(1) |
|
|
|
|
Article 10(2) |
Annex II |
|
|
|
Article 10(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 10(4) |
|
|
|
|
Article 10(5) |
Section 6.1 |
|
|
|
Article 11(1) |
Section 3.4.1 |
|
|
|
Article 11(2) |
Annex II |
|
|
|
Article 11(3) |
Section 3.4.3 |
|
|
|
Article 11(4) |
Section 3.4.3 |
|
|
|
Article 11(5) |
Section 3.4.4 |
|
|
|
Article 11(6) |
|
|
|
|
Article 12(1) |
Section 3.5.1 |
|
|
|
Article 12(2) |
Section 3.5.2 |
|
|
|
Article 12(3) |
|
|
|
Article 1 |
Article 12(4) |
Section 3.5.3 |
|
|
|
Article 12(5) |
Section 3.1.3 |
|
|
|
Article 12(6) |
Section 3.5 |
|
|
|
Article 12(7) |
|
|
|
|
Article 13(1) |
Section 3.3.2 |
|
|
|
Article 13(2) |
Section 3.3.2 |
|
|
|
Article 13(3) |
Section 3.3.2 |
|
|
|
Article 13(4) |
Section 3.3.3 |
|
|
|
Article 13(5) |
Section 3.3.4 |
|
|
|
Article 13(6) |
|
|
|
|
Article 14(1) |
Section 3.2.2 |
|
|
|
Article 14(2) |
Section 3.2.3 |
|
|
|
Article 14(3) |
Section 3.2.4 |
|
|
|
Article 14(4) |
|
|
|
|
Article 15(1) |
Section 3.2, Section 5.1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 15(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 15(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 16(1) |
Section 2.3 |
|
|
|
Article 16(2) |
Section 2.3 |
|
|
|
Article 17(1) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 17(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 17(3) |
Section 4.1.1, Section 4.2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 17(4) |
Section 4.1.5, Section 4.2.5 |
|
|
|
Article 17(5) |
Section 4.1.5 |
|
|
|
Article 17(6) |
Section 4.1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 17(7) |
|
|
|
|
Article 18(1) |
Section 4.1.1, Section 4.1.2 |
|
|
|
Article 18(2) |
Section 4.1.2 |
|
|
|
Article 18(3) |
Section 4.1.3 |
|
|
|
Article 18(4) |
Section 4.1.3 |
|
|
|
Article 19(1) |
Section 4.1.3 |
|
|
|
Article 19(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 19(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 19(4) |
|
|
|
|
Article 19(5) |
Section 4.1.3 |
|
|
|
Article 19(6) |
Section 4.1.3 |
|
|
|
Article 20(1) |
Section 4.1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 20(2) |
Section 4.1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 20(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 21(1) |
Section 4.2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 21(2) |
|
|
|
Article 1 |
Article 21(3) |
Section 4.2.2 |
|
|
|
Article 21(4) |
Section 4.2.3 |
|
|
|
Article 22(1) |
Section 4.2.3 |
|
|
|
Article 22(2) |
Section 4.2.3 |
|
|
|
Article 22(3) |
Section 4.2.3 |
|
|
|
Article 23(1) |
Section 4.2.4 |
|
|
|
Article 23(2) |
Section 4.2.4 |
|
|
|
Article 23(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 24 |
|
|
|
|
Article 25(1) |
Section 5.1.1, Section 5.1.1.3 |
|
|
|
Article 25(2) |
Section 5.1.1, Section 5.1.2.3 |
|
|
|
Article 25(3) |
Section 5.1.1.3 |
|
|
|
Article 26(1) |
Section 5.1.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 26(2) |
Section 5.1.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 26(3) |
Section 5.1.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 26(4) |
Section 5.1.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 27(1) |
Section 5.1.1.2 |
|
|
|
Article 27(2) |
Section 5.1.1.2 |
|
|
|
Article 27(3) |
Section 5.1.1.2 |
|
|
|
Article 27(4) |
Section 5.1.1.2 |
|
|
|
Article 28(1) |
Section 5.1.2 |
|
|
|
Article 28(2) |
Section 5.1.2 |
|
|
|
Article 28(3) |
Section 5.1.2, Section 5.1.2.3 |
|
|
|
Article 29(1) |
Section 5.1.2.2-5.1.2.3 |
|
|
|
Article 29(2) |
Section 5.1.2.2-5.1.2.3 |
|
|
|
Article 30(1) |
Section 5.1.3. |
|
|
|
Article 30(2) |
Section 5.1.3. |
|
|
|
Article 30(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 30(4) |
Section 5.1.3. |
|
|
|
Article 30(5) |
Section 5.1.3. |
|
|
|
Article 31(1) |
Section 5.1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 31(2) |
Section 5.1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 32(1) |
Section 5.1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 32(2) |
Section 5.1.1.3 |
|
|
|
Article 32(3) |
Section 5.1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 32(4) |
Section 5.1.1.3 |
|
|
|
Article 32(5) |
Section 5.1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 32(6) |
Section 5.1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 33(1) |
Section 5.1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 33(2) |
Section 5.1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 33(3) |
Section 5.1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 33(4) |
Section 5.1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 34(1) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 34(2) |
Appendix 2 |
|
|
|
Article 35(1) |
Section 5.1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 35(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 35(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 36(1) |
Section 5.1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 36(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 36(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 37(1) |
Section 5.1.5.1 |
|
|
|
Article 37(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 38(1) |
Section 5.1.5.2 |
|
|
|
Article 38(2) |
Section 5.1.5.2 |
|
|
|
Article 39(1) |
Section 5.1.5.2 |
|
|
|
Article 39(2) |
Section 5.1.5.2 |
|
|
|
Article 40(1) |
Section 5.1.5.3 |
|
|
|
Article 40(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 41(1) |
Section 5.1.5.3 |
|
|
|
Article 41(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 42 |
Section 5.1.5.4 |
|
|
|
Article 43(1) |
Section 5.1.6 |
|
|
|
Article 43(2) |
Section 5.1.6 |
|
|
|
Article 43(3) |
Section 5.1.6 |
|
|
|
Article 43(4) |
|
|
|
|
Article 44(1) |
Section 5.2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 44(2) |
Section 5.2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 45(1) |
Section 5.2.2 |
|
|
|
Article 45(2) |
Section 5.2.2 |
|
|
|
Article 45(3) |
Section 5.2.2 |
|
|
|
Article 46(1) |
Section 5.2.3 |
|
|
|
Article 46(2) |
Section 5.2.3 |
|
|
|
Article 46(3) |
Section 5.2.3 |
|
|
|
Article 47(1) |
Section 5.2.4 |
|
|
|
Article 47(2) |
Section 5.2.4 |
|
|
|
Article 48(1) |
Section 5.2.5 |
|
|
|
Article 48(2) |
Section 5.2.5 |
|
|
|
Article 49(1) |
Section 5.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 49(2) |
Section 5.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 50(1) |
Section 5.3.2 |
|
|
|
Article 50(2) |
Section 5.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 51(1) |
Section 5.3.2 |
|
|
|
Article 51(2) |
Section 5.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 51(3) |
Section 5.3.2 |
|
|
|
Article 52(1) |
Section 5.3.2 |
|
|
|
Article 52(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 53(1) |
Section 5.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 53(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 54(1) |
Section 7.4.2 |
|
|
|
Article 54(2) |
|
|
|
Article 2 |
Article 55 |
Section 2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 56(1) |
Section 2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 56(2) |
Section 2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 56(3) |
Section 2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 56(4) |
Section 2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 57(1) |
|
|
|
|
Article 57(2) |
Section 2.2 |
|
|
|
Article 57(3) |
Section 2.2, Appendix 3 |
|
|
|
Article 57(4) |
Section 2.2, Section 5.2.2 |
|
|
|
Article 57(5) |
|
|
|
|
Article 58(1) |
Section 1.5 |
|
|
|
Article 58(2) |
Section 1.5, Section 6.1 |
|
|
|
Article 58(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 58(4) |
Section 6.4.2 |
|
|
|
Article 58(5) |
Section 6.1 |
|
|
|
Article 58(6) |
Section 6.2 |
|
|
|
Article 59(1) |
Section 6.2.1.2 |
|
|
|
Article 59(2) |
Section 6.1, Section 6.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 59(3) |
Section 6.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 59(4) |
|
|
|
|
Article 59(5) |
Section 6.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 59(6) |
Section 6.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 59(7) |
Section 6.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 60 |
|
|
|
|
Article 61(1) |
Section 6.2 |
|
|
|
Article 61(2) |
Section 6.3.2, Annex to ECB/2014/10 |
|
|
|
Article 62(1) |
Section 6.2.1.1 |
|
Article 3(2) |
|
Article 62(2) |
|
|
Article 3(2) |
|
Article 62(3) |
|
|
Article 3(2) |
|
Article 63(1) |
|
|
Article 3(2) |
|
Article 63(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 63(3) |
Section 6.2.1.1 |
|
Article 3(3) |
|
Article 63(4) |
|
|
Article 3(4) |
|
Article 63(5) |
|
|
Article 3(5) |
|
Article 64 |
Section 6.2.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 65 |
Section 6.2.1.8 |
|
|
|
Article 66(1) |
Section 6.2.1.3, ECB/2014/10 |
|
|
|
Article 66(2) |
Section 6.2.1.3 |
|
|
|
Article 66(3) |
Section 6.2.1.3 |
|
|
|
Article 67(1) |
Section 6.2.1.4, ECB/2014/10 |
|
|
|
Article 67(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 68(1) |
Section 6.2.1.5, Annex to ECB/2014/10 |
|
|
|
Article 68(2) |
Section 6.2.1.5 |
|
|
|
Article 68(3) |
Section 6.2.1.5, Annex to ECB/2014/10 |
|
|
|
Article 69(1) |
Section 6.2.1.6 |
|
|
|
Article 69(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 70(1) |
Section 6.2.1.7 |
|
|
|
Article 70(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 70(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 70(4) |
|
|
|
|
Article 70(5) |
|
|
|
|
Article 70(6) |
|
|
|
|
Article 71 |
|
|
|
|
Article 72 |
Section 6.2.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 73(1) |
Section 6.2.1.1, ECB/2014/10 |
|
|
|
Article 73(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 73(3) |
Section 6.2.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 73(4) |
Section 6.2.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 73(5) |
Section 6.2.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 73(6) |
|
|
Article 4 |
|
Article 73(7) |
|
|
|
|
Article 74(1) |
Section 6.2.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 74(2) |
Section 6.2.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 74(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 74(4) |
Section 6.2.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 75(1) |
Section 6.2.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 75(2) |
Section 6.2.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 76(1) |
Section 6.2.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 76(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 77(1) |
Section 6.2.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 77(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 78(1) |
Section 6.2.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 78(2) |
|
|
Article 11 |
|
Article 79 |
Section 6.2.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 80(1) |
Section 6.2.1.1 |
|
|
|
Article 80(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 80(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 80(4) |
|
|
|
|
Article 80(5) |
|
|
Article 5(2) |
|
Article 81(1) |
Section 6.2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 81(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 82(1) |
Section 6.3.1 |
|
Article 6(2) |
|
Article 82(2) |
Section 6.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 83 |
|
|
Article 1 |
|
Article 84 |
|
|
Article 1 |
|
Article 85 |
|
|
|
|
Article 86 |
|
|
|
|
Article 87(1) |
Section 6.3.2 |
|
|
|
Article 87(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 87(3) |
Section 6.3.2 |
|
|
|
Article 88(1) |
Section 6.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 88(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 89(1) |
Section 6.2.2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 89(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 89(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 89(4) |
|
|
|
|
Article 89(5) |
|
|
|
|
Article 90 |
Section 6.2.2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 91 |
Section 6.2.2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 92 |
Section 6.2.2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 93 |
Section 6.2.2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 94 |
Section 6.2.2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 95(1) |
Section 6.2.2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 95(2) |
Section 6.2.2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 96(1) |
Section 6.2.2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 96(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 96(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 97 |
Section 6.2.2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 98 |
Section 6.2.2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 99(1) |
Section 6.2.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 99(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 100 |
Appendix 7 |
|
|
|
Article 101(1) |
Appendix 7 |
|
|
|
Article 101(2) |
Appendix 7 |
|
|
|
Article 102 |
Appendix 7 |
|
|
|
Article 103(1) |
Appendix 7 |
|
|
|
Article 103(2) |
Appendix 7 |
|
|
|
Article 103(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 104(1) |
Appendix 7 |
|
|
|
Article 104(2) |
Appendix 7 |
|
|
|
Article 104(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 104(4) |
|
|
|
|
Article 105 |
|
|
|
|
Article 106 |
Section 6.2.2 |
|
|
|
Article 107(1) |
Section 6.2.2.2 |
|
|
|
Article 107(2) |
Section 6.2.2.2 |
|
|
|
Article 107(3) |
Section 6.2.2.2 |
|
|
|
Article 107(4) |
Section 6.2.2.2 |
|
|
|
Article 107(5) |
Section 6.2.2.2 |
|
|
|
Article 107(6) |
Section 6.2.2.2 |
|
|
|
Article 107(7) |
Section 6.2.2.2 |
|
|
|
Article 108 |
Section 6.3.1, Section 6.2.2.1, Section 6.3.3.2 |
|
|
|
Article 109(1) |
Section 6.3.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 109(2) |
Section 6.3.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 109(3) |
Section 6.3.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 110(1) |
Section 6.3.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 110(2) |
Section 6.3.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 110(3) |
Section 6.3.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 110(4) |
Section 6.3.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 110(5) |
|
|
|
|
Article 110(6) |
|
|
|
|
Article 110(7) |
Section 6.3.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 111(1) |
Section 6.3.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 111(2) |
Section 6.3.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 112 |
Section 6.3.3.2 |
|
|
|
Article 113(1) |
Section 6.3.2 |
|
|
|
Article 113(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 113(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 114(1) |
Section 6.3.2, section 6.3.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 114(2) |
Section 6.3.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 114(3) |
Section 6.3.2, section 6.3.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 114(4) |
Sections 6.3.2, section 6.3.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 114(5) |
Section 6.3.2, section 6.3.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 115 |
Section 6.3.2, section 6.3.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 116 |
Section 6.2.1.2, section 6.2.2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 117 |
Section 6.2.1.6, section 6.2.2.1 |
|
|
|
Article 118(1) |
|
|
|
|
Article 119(1) |
Section 6.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 119(2) |
Section 6.3.4.1, Section 6.3.4 |
|
|
|
Article 119(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 119(4) |
Section 6.3.4 |
|
|
|
Article 119(5) |
Section 6.3.5 |
|
|
|
Article 120(1) |
|
|
|
|
Article 120(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 120(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 121(1) |
Section 6.3.4.2 |
|
|
|
Article 121(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 121(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 121(4) |
|
|
|
|
Article 122(1) |
Section 6.3.4.3 |
|
|
|
Article 122(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 122(3) |
Section 6.3.4.3 |
|
|
|
Article 122(4) |
|
|
|
|
Article 122(5) |
|
|
|
|
Article 123(1) |
|
|
|
|
Article 123(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 123(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 123(4) |
|
|
|
|
Article 124(1) |
Section 6.3.4.4 |
|
|
|
Article 124(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 124(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 124(4) |
Section 6.3.4.4 |
|
|
|
Article 124(5) |
Section 6.3.4.4 |
|
|
|
Article 125 |
|
|
|
|
Article 126(1) |
Section 6.3.5 |
|
|
|
Article 126(2) |
Section 6.3.5 |
|
|
|
Article 126(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 126(4) |
|
|
|
|
Article 126(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Article 127(1) |
Section 6.4.1 |
|
|
|
Article 127(2) |
Section 6.4.1 |
|
|
|
Article 127(3) |
Section 6.4.1 |
|
|
|
Article 128(1) |
Section 6.4.1 |
|
|
|
Article 128(2) |
Section 6.4.1 |
|
|
|
Article 129(1) |
Section 6.4.2 |
|
Article 8(1) |
|
Article 129(2) |
Section 6.4.2 |
|
|
|
Article 130(1) |
Section 6.4.2 |
|
Article 8(2) |
|
Article 130(2) |
|
|
Article 8(3) |
|
Article 130(3) |
Section 6.4.2 |
|
|
|
Article 130(4) |
|
|
Article 8(4) |
|
Article 130(5) |
Section 6.4.2 |
|
|
|
Article 130(6) |
Section 6.4.2 |
|
|
|
Article 130(7) |
Section 6.4.2 |
|
|
|
Article 130(8) |
Section 6.4.2 |
|
|
|
Article 131(1) |
Section 6.4.3.1 |
|
Article 8(5) |
|
Article 131(2) |
Section 6.4.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 131(3) |
Section 6.4.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 132 |
|
|
Article 8(6) |
|
Article 133 |
Section 6.4.3.3 |
|
|
|
Article 134 |
Section 6.5, Section 6.5.1 |
|
|
|
Article 135 |
Section 6.5.2 |
|
|
|
Article 136(1) |
Section 6.4.2 |
|
|
|
Article 136(2) |
Section 6.4.2 |
|
|
|
Article 136(3) |
Section 6.4.2 |
|
|
|
Article 136(4) |
|
|
|
|
Article 137(1) |
Section 6.7 |
|
|
|
Article 137(2) |
Section 6.7 |
|
|
|
Article 137(3) |
Section 6.7 |
|
|
|
Article 138(1) |
Section 6.2.3.2 |
|
|
|
Article 138(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 138(3) |
Section 6.2.3.2 |
|
|
|
Article 139(1) |
|
Article 1(1) |
|
|
Article 139(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 140 |
Section 6.3.2.3 |
|
|
|
Article 141(1) |
Section 6.4.2 |
|
|
|
Article 141(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 141(3) |
Section 6.2.3.2 |
|
|
|
Article 142(1) |
|
|
|
|
Article 142(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 142(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 142(4) |
|
|
|
|
Article 143(1) |
|
|
|
|
Article 143(2) |
Section 6.2.3.2 |
|
|
|
Article 143(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 144 |
Section 6.2.3 |
|
|
|
Article 145(1) |
Section 6.2.3.2 |
|
|
|
Article 145(2) |
Section 6.2.3.2 |
|
|
|
Article 145(3) |
Section 6.2.3.2 |
|
|
|
Article 145(4) |
Appendix 6 |
|
|
|
Article 146 |
|
|
|
|
Article 147 |
Section 6.2.3.2 |
|
|
|
Article 148(1) |
Section 6.6 |
|
|
|
Article 148(2) |
Section 6.6 |
|
|
|
Article 148(3) |
Section 6.6.1 |
|
|
|
Article 148(4) |
|
|
|
|
Article 148(5) |
|
|
|
|
Article 148(6) |
|
|
|
|
Article 149(1) |
Section 6.6 |
|
|
|
Article 149(2) |
Section 6.6, Section 6.6.2 |
|
|
|
Article 150(1) |
Section 6.6.2 |
|
|
|
Article 150(2) |
Section 6.2.1.4, Section 6.6.2, ECB/2014/10 |
|
|
|
Article 150(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 150(4) |
Section 6.6.2 |
|
|
|
Article 150(5) |
Section 6.6.2 |
|
|
|
Article 150(6) |
|
|
|
|
Article 151(1) |
ECB/2014/10 |
|
|
|
Article 151(2) |
ECB/2014/10 |
|
|
|
Article 151(3) |
ECB/2014/10 |
|
|
|
Article 151(4) |
ECB/2014/10 |
|
|
|
Article 152(1) |
Annex to ECB/2014/10 |
|
|
|
Article 152(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 152(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 153(1) |
Section 2.3 |
|
|
|
Article 153(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 154(1) |
Section 2.3 |
|
|
|
Article 154(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 155 |
Appendix 6 |
|
|
|
Article 156(1) |
Appendix 6 |
|
|
|
Article 156(2) |
Appendix 6 |
|
|
|
Article 156(3) |
Appendix 6 |
|
|
|
Article 156(4) |
Appendix 6 |
|
|
|
Article 156(5) |
Appendix 6, Section 2.3 |
|
|
|
Article 156(6) |
Appendix 6 |
|
|
|
Article 157 |
Section 2.3 |
|
|
|
Article 158(1) |
Section 2.4.1, Section 6.3.1 |
|
Article 9(2) |
|
Article 158(2) |
Section 6.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 158(3) |
Section 2.4.2 |
|
|
|
Article 158(4) |
Section 2.4.3 |
|
|
|
Article 159(1) |
Section 6.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 159(2) |
Section 6.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 159(3) |
Section 6.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 159(4) |
Section 6.3.1 |
|
|
|
Article 160 |
|
|
|
|
Article 161(1) |
Annex II, Section I |
|
|
|
Article 161(2) |
Annex II, Section I |
|
|
|
Article 162 |
Annex II, Section I |
|
|
|
Article 163 |
Annex II, Section I |
|
|
|
Article 164 |
Annex II, Section I |
|
|
|
Article 165(1) |
Annex II, Section I |
|
|
|
Article 165(2) |
Annex II, Section I |
|
|
|
Article 166(1) |
|
|
Article 9(2) |
|
Article 166(2) |
|
|
Article 9(3) |
|
Article 166(3) |
|
|
Article 9(4) |
|
Article 166(4) |
|
|
Article 9(5) |
|
Article 166(5) |
|
|
Article 9(6) |
|
Article 167 |
Annex II, Section I |
|
|
|
Article 168(1) |
Annex II, Section I |
|
|
|
Article 168(2) |
Annex II, Section I |
|
|
|
Article 169(1) |
Annex II, Section I |
|
|
|
Article 169(2) |
Annex II, Section I |
|
|
|
Article 170 |
Annex II, Section I |
|
|
|
Article 171 |
Annex II, Section I |
|
|
|
Article 172 |
Annex II, Section II |
|
|
|
Article 173 |
Annex II, Section II |
|
|
|
Article 174(1) |
Section 3.1.1.3 |
|
|
|
Article 174(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 174(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 175 |
Annex II, Section II |
|
|
|
Article 176(1) |
Annex II, Section II |
|
|
|
Article 176(2) |
Annex II, Section II |
|
|
|
Article 176(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 177(1) |
Annex II, Section II |
|
|
|
Article 177(2) |
Annex II, Section II |
|
|
|
Article 177(3) |
Annex II, Section II |
|
|
|
Article 178 |
Annex II, Section II |
|
|
|
Article 179 |
Annex II, Section II |
|
|
|
Article 180 |
Section 3.1.1.2 |
|
|
|
Article 181(1) |
Section 4.1.2 |
|
|
|
Article 181(2) |
Annex II, Section II |
|
|
|
Article 181(3) |
Annex II, Section II |
|
|
|
Article 182 |
Annex II, Section II |
|
|
|
Article 183 |
Annex II, Section III |
|
|
|
Article 184 |
Annex II, Section III |
|
|
|
Article 185 |
Annex II, Section III |
|
|
|
Article 186(1) |
Annex II, Section III |
|
|
|
Article 186(2) |
Annex II, Section III |
|
|
|
Article 187 |
Section 3.4.2 |
|
|
|
Article 188 |
|
|
|
|
Article 189 |
Section 1.4 |
|
|
|
Article 190(1) |
|
|
|
|
Article 190(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 191(1) |
|
|
|
|
Article 191(2) |
|
|
|
|
Article 191(3) |
|
|
|
|
Article 192 |
|
|
|
|
Annex I Introduction |
Section 7.1 |
|
|
|
Annex I 1 |
Section 7.1 |
|
|
|
Annex I 2 |
Section 7.1 |
|
|
|
Annex I 3 |
Section 1.3.3, Section 7.2 |
|
|
|
Annex I 4 |
|
|
|
|
Annex I 5 |
|
|
|
|
Annex I 6 |
Section 7.2 |
|
|
|
Annex I 7 |
|
|
|
|
Annex I 8 |
Section 1.3.3, Section 7.3.1 |
|
|
|
Annex I 9 |
Section 7.3.1 |
|
|
|
Annex I 10 |
|
|
|
|
Annex I 11 |
|
|
|
|
Annex I 12 |
Section 1.3.3, Section 7.4.3 |
|
|
|
Annex I 13 |
Section 7.6 |
|
|
|
Annex II |
Section 5.1.3 |
|
|
|
Annex III |
Section 5.1.5.1 |
|
|
|
Annex IV |
Section 5.1.6 |
|
|
|
Annex V |
Annex I, Appendix 3 |
|
|
|
Annex VI I.1 |
Section 6.6.1 |
|
|
|
Annex VI I.2 |
|
|
|
|
Annex VI I.(3) |
|
|
|
|
Annex VI I.4 |
Section 6.6.1 |
|
|
|
Annex VI I.5 |
Section 6.6.1 |
|
|
|
Annex VI II.1 |
Section 6.6.2 |
|
|
|
Annex VI II.2 |
Section 6.6.2 |
|
|
|
Annex VI III |
ECB/2014/10 |
|
|
|
Annex VI IV |
ECB/2014/10 |
|
|
|
Annex VII I.1 |
Section 2.3, Appendix 6, Section 1 |
|
|
|
Annex VII I.2 |
Appendix 6, Section 1 |
|
|
|
Annex VII I.3 |
Appendix 6, Section 1 |
|
|
|
Annex VII I.4 |
|
|
|
|
Annex VII I.5 |
|
|
|
|
Annex VII I.6 |
|
|
|
|
Annex VII I.7 |
Appendix 6, Section 1 |
|
|
|
Annex VII I.8 |
Appendix 6, Section 1 |
|
|
|
Annex VII II |
Appendix 6, Section 2.1 |
|
|
|
Annex VIII I.1 |
Annex I, Appendix 8 |
|
|
|
Annex VIII I.2 |
Annex I, Appendix 8 |
|
|
|
Annex VIII I.3 |
Annex I, Appendix 8 |
|
|
|
Annex VIII I.4 |
|
|
|
|
Annex VIII II.1 |
Appendix 8 |
|
|
|
Annex VIII II.2 |
|
|
|
|
Annex VIII II.3 |
Appendix 8 |
|
|
|
Annex VIII II.4 |
Appendix 8 |
|
|
|
Annex VIII III.1 |
Appendix 8 |
|
|
|
Annex VIII III.2 |
Appendix 8 |
|
|
|
Annex VIII III.3 |
Appendix 8 |
|
|
|
Annex VIII III.4 |
Appendix 8 |
|
|
|
Annex IX |
Section 6.3.5 |
|
|
|
Annex X |
|
|
Annex I, Annex II |
|
Annex XI |
|
|
|
|
Annex XII |
|
|
|
|
Annex XIII |
|
|
|
|
Annex XIV |
|
|
|
|
ANNEX XIV
REPEALED GUIDELINE WITH LIST OF ITS SUCCESSIVE AMENDMENTS
Guideline ECB/2011/14 (OJ L 331, 14.12.2011, p. 1).
Guideline ECB/2012/25 (OJ L 359, 29.12.2012, p. 74).
Guideline ECB/2014/10 (OJ L 166, 5.6.2014, p. 33).
Decision ECB/2013/6 (OJ L 95, 5.4.2013, p. 22).
Decision ECB/2013/35 (OJ L 301, 12.11.2013, p. 6).
Decision ECB/2014/23 (OJ L 168, 7.6.2014, p. 115).
( 1 ) Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central securities depositories and amending Directives 98/26/EC and 2014/65/EU and Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 (OJ L 257, 28.8.2014, p. 1).
( 2 ) Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (OJ L 287, 29.10.2013, p. 63).
( 3 ) Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 338).
( 4 ) Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ L 176, 27.6.2013, p. 1).
( 5 ) Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies (OJ L 302, 17.11.2009, p. 1).
( 6 ) Directive 2009/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 on the coordination of laws, regulation and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS) (OJ L 302, 17.11.2009, p. 32).
( 7 ) Regulation (EU) 2017/2402 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2017 laying down a general framework for securitisation and creating a specific framework for simple, transparent and standardised securitisation, and amending Directives 2009/65/EC, 2009/138/EC and 2011/61/EU and Regulations (EC) No 1060/2009 and (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ L 347, 28.12.2017, p. 35).
( 8 ) Regulation (EU) No 549/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on the European system of national and regional accounts in the European Union (ESA 2010) (OJ L 174, 26.6.2013, p. 1).
( 9 ) Guideline ECB/2012/27 of 5 December 2012 on a Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross settlement Express Transfer system (TARGET2) (OJ L 30, 30.1.2013, p. 1).
( 10 ) Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and the Council of 18 June 2020 on the establishment of a framework to facilitate sustainable investment, and amending Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 (OJ L 198, 22.6.2020, p. 13).
( 11 ) Contained in the ‘2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development’ adopted by the UN General Assembly on 25 September 2015.
( 12 ) Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 July 2014 establishing uniform rules and a uniform procedure for the resolution of credit institutions and certain investment firms in the framework of a Single Resolution Mechanism and a Single Resolution Fund and amending Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010 (OJ L 225, 30.7.2014, p. 1).
( 13 ) Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending Council Directive 82/891/EEC, and Directives 2001/24/EC, 2002/47/EC, 2004/25/EC, 2005/56/EC, 2007/36/EC, 2011/35/EU, 2012/30/EU and 2013/36/EU, and Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 648/2012, of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 190).
( 14 ) Decision (EU) 2019/1743 of the European Central Bank of 15 October 2019 on the remuneration of holdings of excess reserves and of certain deposits (ECB/2019/31) (OJ L 267, 21.10.2019, p. 12).
( 15 ) Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU (OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, p. 349).
( 16 ) Regulation (EU) 2016/867 of the European Central Bank of 18 May 2016 on the collection of granular credit and credit risk data (ECB/2016/13) (OJ L 144, 1.6.2016, p. 44).
( 17 ) Guideline (EU) 2016/65 of the European Central Bank of 18 November 2015 on the valuation haircuts applied in the implementation of the Eurosystem monetary policy framework (ECB/2015/35) (OJ L 14, 21.1.2016, p. 30).
( 18 ) Directive 2013/34/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the annual financial statements, consolidated financial statements and related reports of certain types of undertakings, amending Directive 2006/43/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directives 78/660/EEC and 83/349/EEC (OJ L 182, 29.6.2013, p. 19).
( 19 ) Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC (OJ L 145, 30.4.2004, p. 1).
( 20 ) Regulation (EU) No 909/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on improving securities settlement in the European Union and on central securities depositories and amending Directives 98/26/EC and 2014/65/EU and Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 (OJ L 257, 28.8.2014, p. 1).
( 21 ) Directive 98/26/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 1998 on settlement finality in payment and securities settlement systems (OJ L 166, 11.6.1998, p. 45).
( 22 ) Guideline ECB/2012/27 of 5 December 2012 on a Trans-European Automated Real-time Gross settlement Express Transfer system (TARGET2) (OJ L 30, 30.1.2013, p. 1).
( 23 ) CET takes account of the change to Central European Summer Time.