Dit document is overgenomen van EUR-Lex
Document 62021TJ0443
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 January 2023.
YAplus DBA Yoga Alliance v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark YOGA ALLIANCE INDIA INTERNATIONAL – Earlier EU figurative mark yoga ALLIANCE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.
Case T-443/21.
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 January 2023.
YAplus DBA Yoga Alliance v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark YOGA ALLIANCE INDIA INTERNATIONAL – Earlier EU figurative mark yoga ALLIANCE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.
Case T-443/21.
ECLI-code: ECLI:EU:T:2023:7
Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 18 January 2023 –
YAplus DBA Yoga Alliance v EUIPO – Vidyanand (YOGA ALLIANCE INDIA INTERNATIONAL)
(Case T‑443/21) ( 1 )
(EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – International registration designating the European Union – Figurative mark YOGA ALLIANCE INDIA INTERNATIONAL – Earlier EU figurative mark yoga ALLIANCE – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)
1. |
EU trade mark – Procedural provisions – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Opposition proceedings – Examination restricted to the facts, evidence and arguments provided – Well-known facts taken into account (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 95(1)) (see paragraphs 19, 25) |
2. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Weak distinctive character of the earlier mark – Effect (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paragraphs 32, 34, 108-110, 119, 121) |
3. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Refusal to register where there is a relative ground for refusal, even if limited to part of the Union (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paragraph 33) |
4. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Assessment of the likelihood of confusion – Determination of the relevant public – Attention level of the public (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paragraph 40) |
5. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Figurative marks YOGA ALLIANCE INDIA INTERNATIONAL and yoga ALLIANCE (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paragraphs 48-50, 76, 88, 94, 103, 113, 122, 123) |
6. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Similarity of the marks concerned – Criteria for assessment – Composite mark – Assessment of the distinctive character of an element of which a trade mark is composed (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paragraphs 58, 59, 68-71) |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders YAplus DBA Yoga Alliance to pay the costs. |
( 1 ) OJ C 368, 13.9.2021.