This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TJ0400
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.
ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Civil service – Officials – Vacancy notice – Application for interinstitutional transfer – First paragraph of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations – Transfer refusal – Priority order – Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Duty of care – Corrigendum.
Case T-400/21.
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 March 2023.
ZR v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Civil service – Officials – Vacancy notice – Application for interinstitutional transfer – First paragraph of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations – Transfer refusal – Priority order – Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Duty of care – Corrigendum.
Case T-400/21.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:169
Judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) of 29 March 2023 –
ZR v EUIPO
(Case T‑400/21) ( 1 )
(Civil service – Officials – Vacancy notice – Application for interinstitutional transfer – First paragraph of Article 8 of the Staff Regulations – Transfer refusal – Priority order – Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations – Equal treatment – Obligation to state reasons – Manifest error of assessment – Duty of care – Corrigendum)
1. |
Judicial proceedings – Application initiating proceedings – Lodging submissions supplementing the originating application – Whether permissible – Conditions (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Arts 84 and 85) (see paragraphs 17-21) |
2. |
Officials – Inter-institutional transfer – Transfer application – Meaning – Application of an official, seconded to an agency as a temporary agent, referring to a vacancy notice internal to the agency and asking to be transferred to that agency – Included (Staff Regulations of Officials, Art. 8, first para.) (see paragraphs 41-48) |
3. |
Officials – Inter-institutional transfer – Right to a transfer – None – Duty of the host institution to balance the interests involved – Scope (Staff Regulations of Officials, Art. 8, first para.) (see paragraphs 50, 54, 86, 87, 119) |
4. |
Officials – Vacancy notice – Call for expressions of interest aimed at appointing as officials of an agency temporary and contract agents seconded to it – Examination of the applications – Obligation to give priority to officials seconded to the agency – None – Breach of the principle of equal treatment – Absence (Staff Regulations of Officials, Arts 4, 8 and 29(1)(b)) (see paragraphs 60-64, 78, 79, 82, 83) |
5. |
Officials – Inter-institutional transfer – Decision to reject – Obligation to state reasons – Scope (Staff Regulations of Officials, Art. 25(2)) (see paragraphs 94-97) |
6. |
Officials – Inter-institutional transfer – Transfer application – Discretion of the host institution regarding the action to be taken – Judicial review – Limits – Manifest error of assessment – Meaning – Burden of proof (Staff Regulations of Officials, Art. 8) (see paragraphs 106, 107) |
7. |
Officials – Acts of the administration – Presumption of validity – Challenge – Burden of proof – Obligation to put forward evidence capable of challenging the lawfulness of the act (see paragraph 115) |
8. |
Officials – Inter-institutional transfer – Transfer application – Discretion of the host institution regarding the action to be taken – Limits – Respect of the duty of care – Reconciliation with the interests of the service (see paragraphs 125-127) |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders ZR to pay the costs. |
( 1 ) OJ C 368, 13.9.2021.