This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TJ0658
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 September 2023.
Allegro sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark SMART! – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-658/22.
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 September 2023.
Allegro sp. z o.o. v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark SMART! – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-658/22.
Court reports – general
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:517
Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 September 2023 –
Allegro v EUIPO (SMART!)
(Case T‑658/22) ( 1 )
(EU trade mark – Application for the EU word mark SMART! – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
1. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks devoid of distinctive character – Definition – Criteria for assessment (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paragraphs 13, 14) |
2. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks devoid of distinctive character – Marks consisting of advertising slogans – Distinctive character – Application of specific criteria for assessment – Not permissible (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paragraphs 15, 16) |
3. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks devoid of distinctive character – Marks consisting of advertising slogans – Distinctive character – Criteria for assessment (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paragraphs 17, 18) |
4. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks devoid of distinctive character – Trade mark made up of several elements – Possible for the competent authority to examine each of the elements making up the trade mark – Need to take account of the overall perception of the combination by the relevant public (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paragraph 24) |
5. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks devoid of distinctive character – Word mark SMART! (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(b)) (see paragraphs 25-30, 32, 39, 40) |
6. |
EU trade mark – Decisions of EUIPO – Principle of equal treatment –Principle of sound administration – EUIPO’s previous decision-making practice – Principle of legality – Need for a stringent and full examination in each individual case (European Parliament and Council Regulation No 2017/1001) (see paragraphs 46-48) |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
( 1 ) OJ C 482, 19.12.2022.