This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TJ0576
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 September 2023.
Bora Creations, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark TRUE SKIN – Earlier EU figurative mark TRUE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-576/22.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 September 2023.
Bora Creations, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark TRUE SKIN – Earlier EU figurative mark TRUE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-576/22.
Court reports – general
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:509
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 September 2023 –
Bora Creations v EUIPO – True Skincare (TRUE SKIN)
(Case T‑576/22) ( 1 )
(EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark TRUE SKIN – Earlier EU figurative mark TRUE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
1. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Criteria for assessment (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paragraphs 15, 69) |
2. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Refusal to register where there is a relative ground for refusal, even if limited to part of the European Union (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paragraphs 16, 23) |
3. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Assessment of the likelihood of confusion – Determination of the relevant public – Level of attention of the public (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paragraph 18) |
4. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Word mark TRUE SKIN and figurative mark TRUE (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paragraphs 25, 37, 51, 68, 72, 73) |
5. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Similarity between the marks concerned – Criteria for assessment – Composite mark – Assessment of the distinctive character of an element of a trade mark (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paragraphs 26, 27, 34, 38, 39, 49, 57, 62) |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Bora Creations, SL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by True Skincare Ltd; |
3. |
Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs. |
( 1 ) OJ C 424, 7.11.2022.