Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62022TJ0576

    Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 September 2023.
    Bora Creations, SL v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
    EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark TRUE SKIN – Earlier EU figurative mark TRUE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
    Case T-576/22.

    Court reports – general

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:509

     Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 6 September 2023 –
    Bora Creations v EUIPO – True Skincare (TRUE SKIN)

    (Case T‑576/22) ( 1 )

    (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark TRUE SKIN – Earlier EU figurative mark TRUE – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    1. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Criteria for assessment

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 15, 69)

    2. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Refusal to register where there is a relative ground for refusal, even if limited to part of the European Union

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 16, 23)

    3. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Assessment of the likelihood of confusion – Determination of the relevant public – Level of attention of the public

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paragraph 18)

    4. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Word mark TRUE SKIN and figurative mark TRUE

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 25, 37, 51, 68, 72, 73)

    5. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Similarity between the marks concerned – Criteria for assessment – Composite mark – Assessment of the distinctive character of an element of a trade mark

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 26, 27, 34, 38, 39, 49, 57, 62)

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the action;

    2. 

    Orders Bora Creations, SL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by True Skincare Ltd;

    3. 

    Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 424, 7.11.2022.

    Top