Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62022TJ0434

    Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 26 July 2023.
    Topas GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
    EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark VEGE STORY – Earlier EU word mark végé’ – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
    Case T-434/22.

    Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:426

     Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 26 July 2023 –
    Topas v EUIPO – Tarczyński (VEGE STORY)

    (Case T‑434/22) ( 1 )

    (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark VEGE STORY – Earlier EU word mark végé’ – Relative ground for refusal – No likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    1. 

    EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Re-evaluation of the facts in the light of evidence produced for the first time before it – Not included

    (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 188; European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 72(2) and 95)

    (see paragraphs 15, 16)

    2. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Enhanced distinctiveness of the earlier mark – Effect

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 21, 51-53)

    3. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Earlier trade mark constituted by an EU trade mark – Refusal to register where there is a relative ground for refusal, even if limited to part of the Union

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paragraph 22)

    4. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Similarity of the marks concerned – Assessment of the distinctive character of an element of which a trade mark is composed

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 25, 30)

    5. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an identical or similar earlier mark registered in respect of identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Word marks VEGE STORY and végé’

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 38, 42, 46, 47, 49, 50, 60, 62)

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the action;

    2. 

    Orders Topas GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Tarczyński S.A.;

    3. 

    Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 326, 29.8.2022.

    Top