Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62022TJ0277

    Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 6 September 2023.
    Groz-Beckert KG v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
    EU trade mark – Application for the EU trade mark consisting in the application of the colours red and white to cuboid packaging – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001.
    Case T-277/22.

    Court reports – general

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:498

     Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 6 September 2023 –
    Groz-Beckert v EUIPO (Position of the colours red and white on cuboid packaging)

    (Case T‑277/22) ( 1 )

    (EU trade mark – Application for the EU trade mark consisting in the application of the colours red and white to cuboid packaging – Absolute ground for refusal – No distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001)

    1. 

    EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Re-evaluation of the facts in the light of evidence produced for the first time before it – Precluded

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 72)

    (see paragraph 10)

    2. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks devoid of distinctive character – Concept – Criteria for assessment

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 17, 23, 36, 53)

    3. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Signs of which a trade mark may consist – Colours or combinations of colours – Condition – Distinctive character – Account to be taken of the public interest in not unduly restricting the availability of colours

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 18-22)

    4. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks devoid of distinctive character – Marks constituted by a colour or combination of colours

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(b))

    (see paragraph 26)

    5. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks devoid of distinctive character – Mark consisting in the application of the colours red and white to cuboid packaging

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 27-34)

    6. 

    EU trade mark – Decisions of EUIPO – Principle of equal treatment – Principle of sound administration – EUIPO’s previous decision-making practice – Principle of legality – Need for a stringent and full examination in each individual case

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001)

    (see paragraphs 42, 43)

    7. 

    EU trade mark – Procedural provisions – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Registration of a new trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Burden of proof

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(b))

    (see paragraphs 48, 49, 51)

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the action;

    2. 

    Orders Groz-Beckert KG to pay the costs.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 257, 4.7.2022.

    Top