This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TO0751
Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 December 2022.
EMS Electro Medical Systems GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Action for annulment – EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark AIRFLOW – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Case T-751/21.
Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 December 2022.
EMS Electro Medical Systems GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Action for annulment – EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark AIRFLOW – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Case T-751/21.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:856
Order of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 16 December 2022 –
EMS v EUIPO (AIRFLOW)
(Case T‑751/21) ( 1 )
(Action for annulment – EU trade mark – International registration designating the European Union – Word mark AIRFLOW – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
1. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service – Definition (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paragraphs 21, 23, 28, 34, 37, 65) |
2. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service – Assessment of the descriptive nature of a sign – Criteria (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paragraph 22) |
3. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service – Word mark AIRFLOW (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(c)) (see paragraphs 31, 35, 36, 38) |
4. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Overlap of the scope of the grounds set out in Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(b) and (c)) (see paragraphs 43, 44) |
5. |
EU trade mark – Procedural provisions – Statement of reasons for decisions – First sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Scope identical to that of Article 296 TFEU – Recourse by the Board of Appeal to implicit reasoning – Whether permissible – Conditions (Art. 296 TFEU; Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 41(2); European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 94(1), first sentence) (see paragraphs 49-51) |
Operative part
1. |
The action is dismissed. |
2. |
EMS Electro Medical Systems GmbH shall pay the costs. |
( 1 ) OJ C 64, 7.2.2022.