EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TO0603
Order of the President of the General Court of 23 February 2022.
WO v European Public Prosecutor’s Office.
Application for interim measures – Law governing the institutions – Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Appointment of the European Delegated Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Appointment of one of the candidates nominated by Lithuania – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility.
Case T-603/21 R.
Order of the President of the General Court of 23 February 2022.
WO v European Public Prosecutor’s Office.
Application for interim measures – Law governing the institutions – Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Appointment of the European Delegated Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Appointment of one of the candidates nominated by Lithuania – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility.
Case T-603/21 R.
Court reports – general
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:92
Order of the President of the General Court of 23 February 2022 –
WO v European Public Prosecutor’s Office
(Case T‑603/21 R)
(Application for interim measures – Law governing the institutions – Enhanced cooperation on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Regulation (EU) 2017/1939 – Appointment of the European Delegated Prosecutors of the European Public Prosecutor’s Office – Appointment of one of the candidates nominated by Lithuania – Application for suspension of operation of a measure – Failure to comply with procedural requirements – Inadmissibility)
|
1. |
Interim relief – Suspension of operation of a measure – Interim measures – Conditions for granting – Prima facie case – Urgency – Serious and irreparable harm – Cumulative nature – Balancing of all the interests involved (Arts 278 and 279 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 156(4)) (see para. 8) |
|
2. |
Interim relief – Formal requirements – Submission of applications – Summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based – Factual and legal grounds not set out in the application and pleadings – General reference to other documents – Inadmissibility (Arts 278 and 279 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Arts 76(1)(d) and 156(4) and (5); Practical provisions for implementing the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, para. 223) (see paras 10, 11, 17) |
|
3. |
Judicial proceedings – Absolute bar to proceeding – Non-compliance with the Rules of Procedure – To be considered of the Court’s own motion (Arts 256(1), 278 and 279 TFEU; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 156) (see para. 12) |
Operative part
|
1. |
The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
|
2. |
The costs are reserved. |