This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TJ0607
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.
Blueroots Technology GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark SKILLTREE STUDIOS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of descriptive character – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-607/21.
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 September 2022.
Blueroots Technology GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark SKILLTREE STUDIOS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of descriptive character – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
Case T-607/21.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:553
Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 14 September 2022 –
Blueroots Technology v EUIPO – Rezk-Salama and Breitlauch (SKILLTREE STUDIOS)
(Case T‑607/21) ( 1 )
(EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark SKILLTREE STUDIOS – Absolute grounds for refusal – Lack of descriptive character – Distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
1. |
Judicial proceedings – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Identification of the subject matter of the dispute – Summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based – Application not sufficiently clear and precise – Inadmissibility (Statute of the Court of Justice, Arts 21, first para., and 53, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Arts 76(d) and 177(1)(d) and (e)) (see paragraphs 18, 19) |
2. |
EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Review of the lawfulness of decisions of the Boards of Appeal – Re-examination of the facts in the light of evidence not previously submitted before EUIPO bodies – Precluded (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 72) (see paragraphs 34, 35) |
3. |
EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service – Assessment of the descriptive nature of a sign – Criteria (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 7(1)(c) and 52(1)(a)) (see paragraph 54) |
4. |
EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service – Concept of characteristic (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 7(1)(c) and 52(1)(a)) (see paragraphs 55, 56) |
5. |
EU trade mark – Procedural provisions – Examination of the facts of EUIPO’s own motion – Invalidity proceedings concerning absolute grounds for refusal – Examination restricted to the facts, evidence and arguments provided (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 7(1), 52, 55 and 76(1)) (see paragraph 62) |
6. |
EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Absolute grounds for invalidity – Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service – Word mark SKILLTREE STUDIOS (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Arts 7(1)(c) and 52(1)(a)) (see paragraphs 72, 73, 78, 81, 82, 87) |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Blueroots Technology GmbH to pay the costs. |
( 1 ) OJ C 462, 15.11.2021.