Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021TJ0300

    Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 January 2022.
    CNH Industrial NV v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
    EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark SOILXPLORER – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
    Case T-300/21.

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:21

     Judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 January 2022 –
    CNH Industrial v EUIPO (SOILXPLORER)

    (Case T‑300/21)

    (EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark SOILXPLORER – Absolute ground for refusal – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    1. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service – Concept

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(c))

    (see para. 14)

    2. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Absolute grounds for refusal – Marks composed exclusively of signs or indications capable of designating the characteristics of a product or service – Word mark SOILXPLORER

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 7(1)(c))

    (see paras 21, 22, 27, 38)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 March 2021 (Case R 386/2021-5), relating to an application for registration of the word sign SOILXPLORER as an EU trade mark.

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the action;

    2. 

    Orders CNH Industrial NV to pay the costs.

    Top