EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TA0787
Case T-787/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 February 2023 — UniSkin v EUIPO — Unicskin (UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild — Earlier national figurative mark UNICSKIN YOUR EFFECTIVE SOLUTION — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods and services — Distinctive character of the earlier mark — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-787/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 February 2023 — UniSkin v EUIPO — Unicskin (UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild — Earlier national figurative mark UNICSKIN YOUR EFFECTIVE SOLUTION — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods and services — Distinctive character of the earlier mark — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-787/21: Judgment of the General Court of 8 February 2023 — UniSkin v EUIPO — Unicskin (UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild — Earlier national figurative mark UNICSKIN YOUR EFFECTIVE SOLUTION — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods and services — Distinctive character of the earlier mark — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
OJ C 112, 27.3.2023, p. 32–33
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 08/02/2023
- Date lodged:
- 21/12/2021
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- English
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment
- Defendant:
- European Union Intellectual Property Office
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62021TJ0787
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
27.3.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 112/32 |
Judgment of the General Court of 8 February 2023 — UniSkin v EUIPO — Unicskin (UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild)
(Case T-787/21) (1)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark UNISKIN by Dr. Søren Frankild - Earlier national figurative mark UNICSKIN YOUR EFFECTIVE SOLUTION - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the goods and services - Distinctive character of the earlier mark - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2023/C 112/41)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: UniSkin ApS (Silkeborg, Denmark) (represented by: M. Hoffgaard Rasmussen, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Śliwińska and T. Frydendahl, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Unicskin, SL (Madrid, Spain)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 20 October 2021 (Case R 771/2021-4).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders UniSkin ApS to pay the costs. |
