This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TA0122
Case T-122/21: Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2022 — QI v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Evaluation report — 2018 and 2019 evaluation exercises — Unsatisfactory evaluation of managerial performance — General implementing provisions of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations — Validation procedure — Principle of impartiality — Manifest error of assessment)
Case T-122/21: Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2022 — QI v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Evaluation report — 2018 and 2019 evaluation exercises — Unsatisfactory evaluation of managerial performance — General implementing provisions of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations — Validation procedure — Principle of impartiality — Manifest error of assessment)
Case T-122/21: Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2022 — QI v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Evaluation report — 2018 and 2019 evaluation exercises — Unsatisfactory evaluation of managerial performance — General implementing provisions of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations — Validation procedure — Principle of impartiality — Manifest error of assessment)
OJ C 303, 8.8.2022, p. 41–41
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
8.8.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 303/41 |
Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2022 — QI v Commission
(Case T-122/21) (1)
(Civil service - Officials - Evaluation report - 2018 and 2019 evaluation exercises - Unsatisfactory evaluation of managerial performance - General implementing provisions of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations - Validation procedure - Principle of impartiality - Manifest error of assessment)
(2022/C 303/50)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: QI (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and L. Hohenecker, acting as Agents)
Re:
By her action under Article 270 TFEU, lodged at the Court Registry on 25 February 2022, the applicant seeks annulment of her evaluation reports drawn up for the 2018 and 2019 evaluation exercises and of the decision of 16 November 2020 rejecting her complaint against those reports.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Annuls QI’s evaluation report drawn up for the 2019 evaluation exercise; |
2. |
Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
3. |
Orders the parties to bear their own costs. |