This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021CO0221
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2022.
Správa železnic, státní organizace v České dráhy a.s. v České dráhy a.s. and Others and České dráhy a.s.v Univerzita Pardubice and Others.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Decisions of the regulatory body – Article 56(10) – Judicial review – National law providing for the jurisdiction of civil courts – Detailed procedural rules governing the appeal – Compatibility with Directive 2012/34 – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.
Joined Cases C-221/21 and C-222/21.
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2022.
Správa železnic, státní organizace v České dráhy a.s. v České dráhy a.s. and Others and České dráhy a.s.v Univerzita Pardubice and Others.
Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Decisions of the regulatory body – Article 56(10) – Judicial review – National law providing for the jurisdiction of civil courts – Detailed procedural rules governing the appeal – Compatibility with Directive 2012/34 – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling.
Joined Cases C-221/21 and C-222/21.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2022:342
Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 May 2022 – Správa železnic
(Joined Cases C‑221/21 and C‑222/21) ( 1 )
(Reference for a preliminary ruling – Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice – Rail transport – Directive 2012/34/EU – Decisions of the regulatory body – Article 56(10) – Judicial review – National law providing for the jurisdiction of civil courts – Detailed procedural rules governing the appeal – Compatibility with Directive 2012/34 – Manifest inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)
Questions referred for a preliminary ruling – Admissibility – Questions referred lacking sufficient information regarding the legislative context – Lack of information necessary to understand the applicable national legislation – Manifest inadmissibility
(Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94(b))
(see paras 31-34, 36-40, operative part)
Operative part
The requests for a preliminary ruling made by the Obvodní soud pro Prahu 1 (District Court, Prague 1, Czech Republic) by decisions of 22 September 2020 and of 1 October 2020 are manifestly inadmissible.
( 1 ) OJ C 242, 21.6.2021.