Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62021CJ0442

    Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 November 2022.
    ITD, Brancheorganisation for den danske vejgodstransport A/S and Danske Fragtmænd A/S v European Commission.
    Appeal – State aid – Postal sector – Compensation for the discharge of a universal service obligation – Calculation – Net avoided cost methodology – Taking into account the intangible benefits of the universal service – Use of funds granted as compensation – Guarantee covering the redundancy costs of a certain category of employee in the event of insolvency of the universal service provider – Accounting allocation of common costs between universal service activities and non-universal service activities – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market.
    Case C-442/21 P.

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2022:872

     Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 November 2022 –
    ITD and Danske Fragtmænd v Commission

    (Case C‑442/21 P) ( 1 )

    (Appeal – State aid – Postal sector – Compensation for the discharge of a universal service obligation – Calculation – Net avoided cost methodology – Taking into account the intangible benefits of the universal service – Use of funds granted as compensation – Guarantee covering the redundancy costs of a certain category of employee in the event of insolvency of the universal service provider – Accounting allocation of common costs between universal service activities and non-universal service activities – Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market)

    1. 

    Appeal – Grounds – Incorrect assessment of the facts and evidence – Inadmissibility – Review by the Court of the assessment of the facts and evidence – Possible only where the facts or evidence have been distorted – Ground of appeal alleging distortion of the clear sense of the evidence – Need to indicate precisely the evidence alleged to have been distorted and show the errors of appraisal which led to that distortion

    (Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the Court, Art. 168(1)(d))

    (see paragraphs 73-78, 84, 137)

    2. 

    State aid – Prohibition – Exceptions – Undertakings entrusted with the operation of services of general economic interest – Compensation for the costs generated by the public service mission – Guarantee covering the redundancy costs of a certain category of employee in the event of insolvency of the universal service provider – Whether permissible

    (Art. 106(2)TFEU; Commission communication 2012/C 8/03, point 21)

    (see paragraphs 97-105)

    3. 

    State aid – Definition – Grant of an advantage to the beneficiaries – State guarantee granted to an undertaking without any consideration in return and covering redundancy payments to former civil servants in the event of the bankruptcy of the undertaking – Included – Conditions – Improvement in the company’s financial situation – None

    (Art. 107(1), TFEU)

    (see paragraphs 113-115)

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the appeal;

    2. 

    Orders ITD, Brancheorganisation for den danske vejgodstransport A/S and Danske Fragtmænd A/S to bear, in addition to their own costs, those incurred by the European Commission;

    3. 

    Declares that the Kingdom of Denmark and Post Danmark are to bear their own costs.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 382, 20.9.2021.

    Top