This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021CA0655
Case C-655/21, G. ST. T. (Proportionality of the penalty for trade mark infringement): Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad — Nesebar — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against G. ST. T. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Enforcement of intellectual property rights — Directive 2004/48/EC — Article 13 — Criminal procedure — Scope — Harm suffered by the trade mark proprietor as a constituent element of the offence — Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) — Article 61 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 51(1) — Implementation of EU law — Powers — Article 49(1) and (3) — Legality and proportionality of penalties)
Case C-655/21, G. ST. T. (Proportionality of the penalty for trade mark infringement): Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad — Nesebar — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against G. ST. T. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Enforcement of intellectual property rights — Directive 2004/48/EC — Article 13 — Criminal procedure — Scope — Harm suffered by the trade mark proprietor as a constituent element of the offence — Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) — Article 61 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 51(1) — Implementation of EU law — Powers — Article 49(1) and (3) — Legality and proportionality of penalties)
Case C-655/21, G. ST. T. (Proportionality of the penalty for trade mark infringement): Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad — Nesebar — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against G. ST. T. (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Enforcement of intellectual property rights — Directive 2004/48/EC — Article 13 — Criminal procedure — Scope — Harm suffered by the trade mark proprietor as a constituent element of the offence — Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) — Article 61 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 51(1) — Implementation of EU law — Powers — Article 49(1) and (3) — Legality and proportionality of penalties)
OJ C, C/2023/1102, 4.12.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1102/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 19/10/2023
- Date lodged:
- 27/10/2021
- Author:
- Court of Justice
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- Bulgarian
- Type of procedure:
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62021CJ0655
- Instruments cited in case law:
|
Official Journal |
EN Series C |
|
C/2023/1102 |
4.12.2023 |
Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 October 2023 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rayonen sad — Nesebar — Bulgaria) — Criminal proceedings against G. ST. T.
(Case C-655/21, (1) G. ST. T. (Proportionality of the penalty for trade mark infringement))
(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Enforcement of intellectual property rights - Directive 2004/48/EC - Article 13 - Criminal procedure - Scope - Harm suffered by the trade mark proprietor as a constituent element of the offence - Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) - Article 61 - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 51(1) - Implementation of EU law - Powers - Article 49(1) and (3) - Legality and proportionality of penalties)
(C/2023/1102)
Language of the case: Bulgarian
Referring court
Rayonen sad — Nesebar
Parties in the main proceedings
G. ST. T.
Interested party: Rayonna prokuratura Burgas, TO Nesebar
Operative part of the judgment
|
1. |
Article 49(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union must be interpreted as meaning that the principle of the legality of criminal offences and penalties does not preclude national legislation which provides, where a trade mark is used in the course of trade without the consent of the holder of the exclusive right, that the same conduct may be categorised both as an administrative offence and as a criminal offence, without that legislation including criteria allowing a distinction to be drawn between, on the one hand, the administrative offence and, on the other, the criminal offence, the offence being described in similar, or identical, terms, in the criminal law and the law on trade marks. |
|
2. |
Article 49(3) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union must be interpreted as precluding a national legal provision that provides for a custodial sentence of a minimum of five years where a trade mark is used, repeatedly or with significant harmful effects, in the course of trade without the consent of the holder of the exclusive right. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/1102/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)
