This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TO0613
Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 October 2021.
Oriol Junqueras i Vies v European Parliament.
Action for annulment – Acknowledgement by the Parliament of the election of a Member of the European Parliament as a result of another parliamentary seat becoming vacant – Locus standi – Concept of ‘addressee’ of a decision – Lack of direct concern – No regulatory act of general application – Inadmissibility.
Case T-613/20.
Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 October 2021.
Oriol Junqueras i Vies v European Parliament.
Action for annulment – Acknowledgement by the Parliament of the election of a Member of the European Parliament as a result of another parliamentary seat becoming vacant – Locus standi – Concept of ‘addressee’ of a decision – Lack of direct concern – No regulatory act of general application – Inadmissibility.
Case T-613/20.
Court reports – general
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2021:682
Order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) of 5 October 2021 –
Junqueras i Vies v Parliament
(Case T‑613/20)
(Action for annulment – Acknowledgement by the Parliament of the election of a Member of the European Parliament as a result of another parliamentary seat becoming vacant – Locus standi – Concept of ‘addressee’ of a decision – Lack of direct concern – No regulatory act of general application – Inadmissibility)
|
1. |
Action for annulment – Application brought by the natural or legal person to whom the contested measure is addressed – Notion of addressee – Mere reference to the person’s name in that decision – Precluded (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU) (see paras 26, 28) |
|
2. |
Action for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them – Whether directly concerned – Criteria – Acknowledgement by the Parliament of the election of a Member of the European Parliament as a result of another parliamentary seat becoming vacant – No direct effect on the applicant’s legal position – Lack of individual concern – Inadmissibility (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU) (see paras 33-35) |
|
3. |
Action for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Regulatory acts – Acts not entailing implementing measures and concerning the applicant directly – Conditions cumulative in nature – Act not directly affecting the applicant – Inadmissibility (Art. 263, fourth para., TFEU) (see para. 63) |
Operative part
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
2. |
There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene made by the Kingdom of Spain. |
|
3. |
Mr Oriol Junqueras i Vies shall pay the costs. |
|
4. |
The Kingdom of Spain shall bear the costs relating to its application for leave to intervene. |