Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62020TJ0739

    Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 June 2022.
    Unite the Union v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
    EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark WATERFORD – Action for annulment – Article 63(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility – Trade mark liable to mislead the public – Article 51(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001).
    Case T-739/20.

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:381

     Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 22 June 2022 –
    Unite the Union v EUIPO – WWRD Ireland (WATERFORD)

    (Case T‑739/20) ( 1 )

    (EU trade mark – Revocation proceedings – EU word mark WATERFORD – Action for annulment – Article 63(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Admissibility – Trade mark liable to mislead the public – Article 51(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001))

    1. 

    Fundamental rights – Right to effective judicial protection – Right to an effective remedy – Scope

    (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 47, first para.)

    (see para. 27)

    2. 

    EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Review of the legality of decisions of the Boards of Appeal – Annulment or variation for reasons appearing after judgment was delivered – Precluded

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 72(2) and 95)

    (see para. 33)

    3. 

    EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Review of the legality of decisions of the Boards of Appeal – Re-examination of the facts in the light of evidence not previously submitted before EUIPO bodies – Precluded

    (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 188; European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Arts 72 and 95)

    (see para. 34)

    4. 

    EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Causes of revocation – Trade mark liable to mislead the public – Conditions

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 51(1)(c))

    (see paras 47, 50, 51)

    5. 

    EU trade mark – Procedural provisions – Probative value of the evidence – Opinion poll

    (see paras 56, 57)

    6. 

    EU trade mark – Surrender, revocation and invalidity – Causes of revocation – Mark liable to mislead the public – Word mark WATERFORD

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 51(1)(c))

    (see paras 49, 52, 65, 66)

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the action;

    2. 

    Orders Unite the Union to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by WWRD Ireland IPCO LLC;

    3. 

    Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.


    ( 1 ) OJ C 62, 22.2.2021.

    Top