This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TJ0738
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 June 2022.
Deutschtec GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark HOLUX – Earlier international registration in respect of the word mark HOLUX – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8 (1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-738/20.
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 June 2022.
Deutschtec GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark HOLUX – Earlier international registration in respect of the word mark HOLUX – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8 (1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001.
Case T-738/20.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2022:343
Judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 8 June 2022 –
Deutschtec v EUIPO – Group A (HOLUX)
(Case T‑738/20) ( 1 )
( EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for the EU word mark HOLUX – Earlier international registration in respect of the word mark HOLUX – Relative grounds for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 )
1. |
Judicial proceedings – Application initiating proceedings – Formal requirements – Summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based (Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 21, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 177(1)(d)) (see para. 15) |
2. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Criteria for assessment (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 19-21) |
3. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Similarity between the goods or services in question – Criteria for assessment – Complementary nature of the goods or services (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 34, 37, 48, 49, 62) |
4. |
EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Word marks HOLUX (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 35, 38, 57, 63-65, 72, 78-83) |
Operative part
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Deutschtec GmbH to pay the costs. |
( 1 ) OJ C 53, 15.2.2021.