Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62020TJ0219

    Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 October 2021.
    JK v European Commission.
    Civil service – Officials – Commission staff working for the EEAS – Request for assistance – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Implied decision rejecting the request – Decision rejecting the complaint – Article 90 of the Staff Regulations – Competent Appointing Authority – Principle of sound administration.
    Case T-219/20.

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2021:690

     Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 13 October 2021 –
    JK v Commission

    (Case T‑219/20)

    (Civil service – Officials – Commission staff working for the EEAS – Request for assistance – Article 24 of the Staff Regulations – Implied decision rejecting the request – Decision rejecting the complaint – Article 90 of the Staff Regulations – Competent Appointing Authority – Principle of sound administration)

    1. 

    Actions brought by officials – Prior administrative complaint – Nature of the procedure – Purpose – Decision to reject – Response by the administration concerning a decision other than that disputed in the complaint – Not permissible

    (Staff Regulations of Officials, Art. 90(1))

    (see paras 55-60)

    2. 

    Officials – Obligation of administration to provide assistance – Implementation in the case of psychological harassment – Bringing of a request for assistance – Implied decision to reject – Purpose – Decision taking effect without awareness from the administration as to the nature of the request – Not permissible – Infringement of the principle of sound administration – Consequences

    (Staff Regulations of Officials, Arts 24 and 90(1))

    (see paras 62-67)

    Re:

    Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s implied decision of 5 June 2019 rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance brought under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and of its decision of 6 January 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint.

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1.

    Annuls the implied decision of the European Commission of 5 June 2019 rejecting JK’s request for assistance brought under Article 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and its decision of 6 January 2020 rejecting the applicant’s complaint;

    2.

    Orders the Commission to bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by JK.

    Top