This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TB0083
Case T-83/20: Order of the General Court of 16 June 2022 — bonnanwalt v EUIPO — Bayerischer Rundfunk and Others (tagesschau) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark tagesschau — Partial revocation — Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant — Inadmissibility)
Case T-83/20: Order of the General Court of 16 June 2022 — bonnanwalt v EUIPO — Bayerischer Rundfunk and Others (tagesschau) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark tagesschau — Partial revocation — Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant — Inadmissibility)
Case T-83/20: Order of the General Court of 16 June 2022 — bonnanwalt v EUIPO — Bayerischer Rundfunk and Others (tagesschau) (EU trade mark — Revocation proceedings — EU word mark tagesschau — Partial revocation — Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant — Inadmissibility)
OJ C 303, 8.8.2022, p. 44–45
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 16/06/2022
- Date lodged:
- 12/02/2020
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- German
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - inadmissible
- Defendant:
- European Union Intellectual Property Office
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62020TO0083
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
- EUROVOC descriptor:
|
8.8.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 303/44 |
Order of the General Court of 16 June 2022 — bonnanwalt v EUIPO — Bayerischer Rundfunk and Others (tagesschau)
(Case T-83/20) (1)
(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark tagesschau - Partial revocation - Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant - Inadmissibility)
(2022/C 303/56)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: T. Wendt, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)
Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Bayerischer Rundfunk (Munich, Germany) and the eight other interveners whose names are set out in the annex to the order (represented by: B. Krause, lawyer)
Re:
By its action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 December 2019 (Case R 1487/2019-2).
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
|
2. |
bonnanwalt Vermögens- und Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH shall pay the costs. |
