This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TA0226
Case T-226/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — Steinel v EUIPO (MobileHeat) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark MobileHeat — Relative ground for refusal — Descriptive nature — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-226/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — Steinel v EUIPO (MobileHeat) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark MobileHeat — Relative ground for refusal — Descriptive nature — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-226/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — Steinel v EUIPO (MobileHeat) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark MobileHeat — Relative ground for refusal — Descriptive nature — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
OJ C 206, 31.5.2021, p. 24–24
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
31.5.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 206/24 |
Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — Steinel v EUIPO (MobileHeat)
(Case T-226/20) (1)
(EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark MobileHeat - Relative ground for refusal - Descriptive nature - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2021/C 206/30)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Steinel GmbH (Herzebrock-Clarholz, Germany) (represented by: M. Breuer and K. Freudenstein, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 February 2020 (Case R 2472/2019-2) concerning an application for registration of the word sign MobileHeat as an EU trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Steinel GmbH to pay the costs. |