Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62020TA0226

    Case T-226/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — Steinel v EUIPO (MobileHeat) (EU trade mark — Application for the EU word mark MobileHeat — Relative ground for refusal — Descriptive nature — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    OJ C 206, 31.5.2021, p. 24–24 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    31.5.2021   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 206/24


    Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — Steinel v EUIPO (MobileHeat)

    (Case T-226/20) (1)

    (EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark MobileHeat - Relative ground for refusal - Descriptive nature - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

    (2021/C 206/30)

    Language of the case: German

    Parties

    Applicant: Steinel GmbH (Herzebrock-Clarholz, Germany) (represented by: M. Breuer and K. Freudenstein, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 February 2020 (Case R 2472/2019-2) concerning an application for registration of the word sign MobileHeat as an EU trade mark.

    Operative part of the judgment

    The Court:

    1.

    Dismisses the action;

    2.

    Orders Steinel GmbH to pay the costs.


    (1)  OJ C 201, 15.6.2020.


    Top