This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62020TA0186
Case T-186/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — Chatwal v EUIPO — Timehouse Capital (THE TIME) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark THE TIME — Earlier EU word mark TIMEHOUSE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-186/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — Chatwal v EUIPO — Timehouse Capital (THE TIME) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark THE TIME — Earlier EU word mark TIMEHOUSE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-186/20: Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — Chatwal v EUIPO — Timehouse Capital (THE TIME) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark THE TIME — Earlier EU word mark TIMEHOUSE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
OJ C 206, 31.5.2021, p. 23–23
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
- Date of document:
- 17/03/2021
- Date lodged:
- 03/04/2020
- Author:
- General Court
- Form:
- Judicial information
- Authentic language:
- English
- Type of procedure:
- Action for annulment - unfounded
- Defendant:
- European Union Intellectual Property Office
- Link
- Select all documents mentioning this document
- Case affecting:
-
- Related EU case-law document 62020TJ0186
- Instruments cited in case law:
- Link
|
31.5.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 206/23 |
Judgment of the General Court of 17 March 2021 — Chatwal v EUIPO — Timehouse Capital (THE TIME)
(Case T-186/20) (1)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark THE TIME - Earlier EU word mark TIMEHOUSE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2021/C 206/29)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Chatwal Hotels & Resorts LLC (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: N. Hine, solicitor)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Timehouse Capital GmbH (Grasbrunn, Germany) (represented by: T. Farkas, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 January 2020 (Case R 2264/2018-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Timehouse Capital and Chatwal Hotels & Resorts.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Chatwal Hotels & Resorts LLC to pay the costs. |
