Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019TJ0377

    Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 November 2020.
    Topcart GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
    EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TC CARL – Earlier national figurative mark CARL TOUCH – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001).
    Case T-377/19.

    ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2020:546

     Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 18 November 2020 –
    Topcart v EUIPO – Carl International (TC CARL)

    (Case T‑377/19)

    (EU trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for EU word mark TC CARL – Earlier national figurative mark CARL TOUCH – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

    1. 

    EU trade mark – Appeals procedure – Action before the EU judicature – Jurisdiction of the General Court – Review of the lawfulness of decisions of the Boards of Appeal – Re-examination of the facts in the light of evidence not previously submitted before EUIPO bodies – Precluded

    (European Parliament and Council Regulation 2017/1001, Art. 72)

    (see para. 23)

    2. 

    Acts of the institutions – Temporal application – Application of the substantive law in force at the time of the application for the registration of a trade mark

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see para. 27)

    3. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Criteria for assessment

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paras 28-31, 77, 83, 86)

    4. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Word mark TC CARL and figurative mark CARL TOUCH

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paras 43, 50, 53, 74, 80, 89, 95)

    5. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Similarity of the marks concerned – Criteria for assessment

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see paras 44-47, 59-62, 64)

    6. 

    EU trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the EU trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark – Weak distinctive character of the earlier mark – Effect

    (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b))

    (see para. 78)

    Re:

    Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 April 2019 (Case R 1826/2018-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Carl International and Topcart.

    Operative part

    The Court:

    1. 

    Dismisses the action;

    2. 

    Orders Topcart GmbH to pay the costs.

    Top