This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019CO0867
Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 13 February 2020.
Conféderation nationale du Crédit Mutuel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.
Case C-867/19 P.
Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 13 February 2020.
Conféderation nationale du Crédit Mutuel v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed.
Case C-867/19 P.
Court reports – general – 'Information on unpublished decisions' section
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:C:2020:103
Order of the Court (Chamber determining whether appeals may proceed) of 13 February 2020 — Conféderation nationale du Crédit Mutuel v Credit Mutuel Arkéa
(Case C‑867/19 P)
(Appeal — EU trade mark — Determination as to whether appeals should be allowed to proceed — Article 170 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Request failing to demonstrate a significant issue with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Appeal not allowed to proceed)
|
1. |
Appeal — Preliminary admission scheme — Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Burden of proof (Statue of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170) (see para. 10) |
|
2. |
Appeal — Preliminary admission scheme — Request that an appeal be allowed to proceed — Formal requirements — Scope (Statue of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170a and 170) (see paras 11-13) |
|
3. |
Appeal — Preliminary admission scheme — Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Question not having been subject to examination by the Court — Request for the appeal to be allowed to proceed not demonstrating that the issue is significant — Appeal not allowed to proceed (Statue of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170a and 170) (see paras 14, 15) |
|
4. |
Appeal — Preliminary admission scheme — Issue that is significant with respect to the unity, consistency or development of EU law — Contrary to the Court’s case-law — Request for the appeal to be allowed to proceed not demonstrating that the issue is significant — Appeal not allowed to proceed (Statue of the Court of Justice, Art. 58a; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 170a and 170) (see paras 16-19) |
Operative part
|
1. |
The appeal is not allowed to proceed. |
|
2. |
Confédération nationale du Crédit Mutuel shall bear its own costs. |